The role of fluorescence angiography in colonic interposition after esophagectomy.

J J Joosten, S S Gisbertz, D J Heineman, F Daams, W J Eshuis, M I van Berge Henegouwen
{"title":"The role of fluorescence angiography in colonic interposition after esophagectomy.","authors":"J J Joosten,&nbsp;S S Gisbertz,&nbsp;D J Heineman,&nbsp;F Daams,&nbsp;W J Eshuis,&nbsp;M I van Berge Henegouwen","doi":"10.1093/dote/doac076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colonic interposition is an alternative for gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurs in 15-25% of patients and may be attributed to reduced blood supply after vascular ligation. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) can visualize tissue perfusion. We aimed to give an overview of the first experiences of ICG-FA and AL rate in colonic interposition. This study included all consecutive patients who underwent a colonic interposition between January 2015 and December 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Surgery was performed for the following indications: inability to use the stomach because of previous surgery or extensive tumour involvement, cancer recurrence in the gastric conduit, or because of complications after initial esophagectomy. Since 2018 ICG-FA was performed before anastomotic reconstruction by administration of ICG injection (0.1 mg/kg/bolus), using the Spy-phi (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI). Twenty-eight patients (9 female, mean age 62.8), underwent colonic interposition of whom 15 (54%) underwent ICG-FA-guided surgery. Within the ICG-FA group, three (20%) AL occurred, whereas in the non-ICG-FA group, three AL and one graft necrosis (31%) occurred (P=0.67). There was a change of management due to the FA assessment in three patients in the FA group (20%) which led to the choice of a different bowel segment for the anastomosis. Mean operative times in the ICG-FA and non-ICG-FA groups were 372±99 and 399±113 minutes, respectively (P=0.85). ICG-FA is a safe, easy and feasible technique to assess perfusion of colonic interpositions. ICG-FA is of added value leading to a change in management in a considerable percentage of patients. Its role in prevention of AL remains to be elucidated.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colonic interposition is an alternative for gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurs in 15-25% of patients and may be attributed to reduced blood supply after vascular ligation. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) can visualize tissue perfusion. We aimed to give an overview of the first experiences of ICG-FA and AL rate in colonic interposition. This study included all consecutive patients who underwent a colonic interposition between January 2015 and December 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Surgery was performed for the following indications: inability to use the stomach because of previous surgery or extensive tumour involvement, cancer recurrence in the gastric conduit, or because of complications after initial esophagectomy. Since 2018 ICG-FA was performed before anastomotic reconstruction by administration of ICG injection (0.1 mg/kg/bolus), using the Spy-phi (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI). Twenty-eight patients (9 female, mean age 62.8), underwent colonic interposition of whom 15 (54%) underwent ICG-FA-guided surgery. Within the ICG-FA group, three (20%) AL occurred, whereas in the non-ICG-FA group, three AL and one graft necrosis (31%) occurred (P=0.67). There was a change of management due to the FA assessment in three patients in the FA group (20%) which led to the choice of a different bowel segment for the anastomosis. Mean operative times in the ICG-FA and non-ICG-FA groups were 372±99 and 399±113 minutes, respectively (P=0.85). ICG-FA is a safe, easy and feasible technique to assess perfusion of colonic interpositions. ICG-FA is of added value leading to a change in management in a considerable percentage of patients. Its role in prevention of AL remains to be elucidated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

荧光血管造影在食管切除术后结肠间置中的作用。
结肠介入是食管切除术后胃导管重建的一种选择。吻合口漏(AL)发生在15-25%的患者中,可能是由于血管结扎后血供减少。吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影(ICG-FA)可以显示组织灌注。我们的目的是概述ICG-FA和AL率在结肠介入中的首次经验。该研究纳入了2015年1月至2021年12月在三级转诊中心接受结肠介入治疗的所有连续患者。手术适用于以下适应症:因既往手术或广泛肿瘤累及而无法使用胃,胃管癌复发,或因初次食管切除术后的并发症。自2018年起,使用Spy-phi (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI)在吻合口重建前通过注射ICG (0.1 mg/kg/丸)进行ICG- fa。28例患者(9例女性,平均年龄62.8岁)行结肠介入手术,其中15例(54%)行icg - fa引导手术。ICG-FA组发生3例AL(20%),而非ICG-FA组发生3例AL和1例移植物坏死(31%)(P=0.67)。由于FA组中有3例(20%)患者的FA评估改变了处理方法,导致选择不同的肠段进行吻合。ICG-FA组和非ICG-FA组的平均手术时间分别为372±99分钟和399±113分钟(P=0.85)。ICG-FA是一种安全、简便、可行的结肠间置血流灌注评估技术。在相当比例的患者中,ICG-FA具有附加价值,导致管理改变。其在AL预防中的作用仍有待阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信