Transcaval Coil Embolization of Type 2 Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Repair: An Institutional Review.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-09 DOI:10.1177/15385744231188803
Gerald A Cheadle, Amit J Dwivedi, Erik J Wayne, William G Cheadle, Abindra Sigdel
{"title":"Transcaval Coil Embolization of Type 2 Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Repair: An Institutional Review.","authors":"Gerald A Cheadle, Amit J Dwivedi, Erik J Wayne, William G Cheadle, Abindra Sigdel","doi":"10.1177/15385744231188803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Endovascular aortic repair may be complicated by type 2 endoleaks. Intervention is generally recommended when the native sac continues to grow more than 5 mm. Transcaval coil embolization (TCE) of the native aneurysm sac is an emerging technique for repair of type 2 endoleaks. The objective of this study is to report an institutional review of our experience with this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>11 patients underwent TCE during the study period. Data were gathered on demographics, size increase of native aneurysm sac, operative details, and outcomes. Technical success was defined as resolution of the endoleak during completion sac angiogram at end of the procedure. Clinical success was defined as no growth in the aneurysm sac at interval follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coils were the embolant of choice in all cases. Technical success was achieved in all cases except 1 resulting in a 91% technical success rate. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 3-33). Of the ten patients that had technically successful embolization, 8 patients had repeat computed tomography (CT) scans which showed no further expansion of the native sac resulting in a 80% clinical success rate. No complications were noted immediately post-op or at interval follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This institutional retrospective review demonstrates that TCE is an effective and safe option for type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in selected patients with favorable anatomy. Longer term follow-up, more patients, and comparison studies are needed to further define durability and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23530,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231188803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Endovascular aortic repair may be complicated by type 2 endoleaks. Intervention is generally recommended when the native sac continues to grow more than 5 mm. Transcaval coil embolization (TCE) of the native aneurysm sac is an emerging technique for repair of type 2 endoleaks. The objective of this study is to report an institutional review of our experience with this technique.

Methods: 11 patients underwent TCE during the study period. Data were gathered on demographics, size increase of native aneurysm sac, operative details, and outcomes. Technical success was defined as resolution of the endoleak during completion sac angiogram at end of the procedure. Clinical success was defined as no growth in the aneurysm sac at interval follow-up.

Results: Coils were the embolant of choice in all cases. Technical success was achieved in all cases except 1 resulting in a 91% technical success rate. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 3-33). Of the ten patients that had technically successful embolization, 8 patients had repeat computed tomography (CT) scans which showed no further expansion of the native sac resulting in a 80% clinical success rate. No complications were noted immediately post-op or at interval follow-up.

Conclusions: This institutional retrospective review demonstrates that TCE is an effective and safe option for type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in selected patients with favorable anatomy. Longer term follow-up, more patients, and comparison studies are needed to further define durability and efficacy.

经颅线圈栓塞治疗血管内主动脉修复后2型内漏:一项制度回顾。
目的:血管内主动脉修复可能并发2型内漏。当原囊继续生长超过5毫米时,一般建议进行干预。经颅线圈栓塞术(TCE)是修复2型动脉瘤囊的一种新兴技术。本研究的目的是报告我们使用该技术的经验的机构审查。方法:11例患者在研究期间接受了TCE。收集了人口统计学、动脉瘤囊大小增加、手术细节和结果的数据。技术上的成功被定义为在手术结束时完成囊血管造影时解决内漏。临床成功的定义是间隔随访时动脉瘤囊没有生长。结果:线圈是所有病例的首选栓塞剂。除1例导致91%的技术成功率外,在所有情况下都取得了技术成功。中位随访时间为25个月(范围3-33)。在技术上成功栓塞的10例患者中,8例患者进行了重复计算机断层扫描(CT),显示原生囊没有进一步扩张,临床成功率为80%。术后或间隔随访均未发现并发症。结论:本机构回顾性研究表明,对于解剖结构良好的2型血管内主动脉修复(EVAR)后的患者,TCE是一种有效且安全的选择。需要更长期的随访,更多的患者和比较研究来进一步确定持久性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery SURGERY-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (VES) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes information to guide vascular specialists in endovascular, surgical, and medical treatment of vascular disease. VES contains original scientific articles on vascular intervention, including new endovascular therapies for peripheral artery, aneurysm, carotid, and venous conditions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信