Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers.

Emma M Karlsson, Kenneth Hugdahl, Marco Hirnstein, David P Carey
{"title":"Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers.","authors":"Emma M Karlsson,&nbsp;Kenneth Hugdahl,&nbsp;Marco Hirnstein,&nbsp;David P Carey","doi":"10.1093/texcom/tgad009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>About 95% of right-handers and 70% of left-handers have a left-hemispheric specialization for language. Dichotic listening is often used as an indirect measure of this language asymmetry. However, while it reliably produces a right-ear advantage (REA), corresponding to the left-hemispheric specialization of language, it paradoxically often fails to obtain statistical evidence of mean differences between left- and right-handers. We hypothesized that non-normality of the underlying distributions might be in part responsible for the similarities in means. Here, we compare the mean ear advantage scores, and also contrast the distributions at multiple quantiles, in two large independent samples (Ns = 1,358 and 1,042) of right-handers and left-handers. Right-handers had an increased mean REA, and a larger proportion had an REA than in the left-handers. We also found that more left-handers are represented in the left-eared end of the distribution. These data suggest that subtle shifts in the distributions of DL scores for right- and left-handers may be at least partially responsible for the unreliability of significantly reduced mean REA in left-handers.</p>","PeriodicalId":72551,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex communications","volume":"4 2","pages":"tgad009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgad009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

About 95% of right-handers and 70% of left-handers have a left-hemispheric specialization for language. Dichotic listening is often used as an indirect measure of this language asymmetry. However, while it reliably produces a right-ear advantage (REA), corresponding to the left-hemispheric specialization of language, it paradoxically often fails to obtain statistical evidence of mean differences between left- and right-handers. We hypothesized that non-normality of the underlying distributions might be in part responsible for the similarities in means. Here, we compare the mean ear advantage scores, and also contrast the distributions at multiple quantiles, in two large independent samples (Ns = 1,358 and 1,042) of right-handers and left-handers. Right-handers had an increased mean REA, and a larger proportion had an REA than in the left-handers. We also found that more left-handers are represented in the left-eared end of the distribution. These data suggest that subtle shifts in the distributions of DL scores for right- and left-handers may be at least partially responsible for the unreliability of significantly reduced mean REA in left-handers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对分布的分析揭示了左撇子和右撇子在二元听力分数上的真正差异。
大约95%的右撇子和70%的左撇子都有一个专门负责语言的左半球。二分聆听常被用来间接衡量这种语言不对称。然而,虽然它确实产生了右耳优势(REA),与左半球语言专业化相对应,但矛盾的是,它往往无法获得左撇子和右撇子之间平均差异的统计证据。我们假设,潜在分布的非正态性可能是导致均值相似的部分原因。在这里,我们比较了右撇子和左撇子的平均耳朵优势分数,并在多个分位数上对比了两个大型独立样本(Ns = 1,358和1,042)的分布。右撇子的平均REA增加,并且比左撇子的REA比例更大。我们还发现,在分布的左耳端有更多的左撇子。这些数据表明,右撇子和左撇子的DL分数分布的微妙变化可能至少部分地导致了左撇子显著降低的平均REA的不可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信