Identification of Influential Variants in Significant Aggregate Rare Variant Tests.

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Human Heredity Pub Date : 2021-02-10 DOI:10.1159/000513290
Rachel Z Blumhagen, David A Schwartz, Carl D Langefeld, Tasha E Fingerlin
{"title":"Identification of Influential Variants in Significant Aggregate Rare Variant Tests.","authors":"Rachel Z Blumhagen, David A Schwartz, Carl D Langefeld, Tasha E Fingerlin","doi":"10.1159/000513290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies that examine the role of rare variants in both simple and complex disease are increasingly common. Though the usual approach of testing rare variants in aggregate sets is more powerful than testing individual variants, it is of interest to identify the variants that are plausible drivers of the association. We present a novel method for prioritization of rare variants after a significant aggregate test by quantifying the influence of the variant on the aggregate test of association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In addition to providing a measure used to rank variants, we use outlier detection methods to present the computationally efficient Rare Variant Influential Filtering Tool (RIFT) to identify a subset of variants that influence the disease association. We evaluated several outlier detection methods that vary based on the underlying variance measure: interquartile range (Tukey fences), median absolute deviation, and SD. We performed 1,000 simulations for 50 regions of size 3 kb and compared the true and false positive rates. We compared RIFT using the Inner Tukey to 2 existing methods: adaptive combination of p values (ADA) and a Bayesian hierarchical model (BeviMed). Finally, we applied this method to data from our targeted resequencing study in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All outlier detection methods observed higher sensitivity to detect uncommon variants (0.001 < minor allele frequency, MAF > 0.03) compared to very rare variants (MAF <0.001). For uncommon variants, RIFT had a lower median false positive rate compared to the ADA. ADA and RIFT had significantly higher true positive rates than that observed for BeviMed. When applied to 2 regions found previously associated with IPF including 100 rare variants, we identified 6 polymorphisms with the greatest evidence for influencing the association with IPF.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In summary, RIFT has a high true positive rate while maintaining a low false positive rate for identifying polymorphisms influencing rare variant association tests. This work provides an approach to obtain greater resolution of the rare variant signals within significant aggregate sets; this information can provide an objective measure to prioritize variants for follow-up experimental studies and insight into the biological pathways involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":13226,"journal":{"name":"Human Heredity","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353006/pdf/nihms-1658543.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Heredity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000513290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies that examine the role of rare variants in both simple and complex disease are increasingly common. Though the usual approach of testing rare variants in aggregate sets is more powerful than testing individual variants, it is of interest to identify the variants that are plausible drivers of the association. We present a novel method for prioritization of rare variants after a significant aggregate test by quantifying the influence of the variant on the aggregate test of association.

Methods: In addition to providing a measure used to rank variants, we use outlier detection methods to present the computationally efficient Rare Variant Influential Filtering Tool (RIFT) to identify a subset of variants that influence the disease association. We evaluated several outlier detection methods that vary based on the underlying variance measure: interquartile range (Tukey fences), median absolute deviation, and SD. We performed 1,000 simulations for 50 regions of size 3 kb and compared the true and false positive rates. We compared RIFT using the Inner Tukey to 2 existing methods: adaptive combination of p values (ADA) and a Bayesian hierarchical model (BeviMed). Finally, we applied this method to data from our targeted resequencing study in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

Results: All outlier detection methods observed higher sensitivity to detect uncommon variants (0.001 < minor allele frequency, MAF > 0.03) compared to very rare variants (MAF <0.001). For uncommon variants, RIFT had a lower median false positive rate compared to the ADA. ADA and RIFT had significantly higher true positive rates than that observed for BeviMed. When applied to 2 regions found previously associated with IPF including 100 rare variants, we identified 6 polymorphisms with the greatest evidence for influencing the association with IPF.

Discussion: In summary, RIFT has a high true positive rate while maintaining a low false positive rate for identifying polymorphisms influencing rare variant association tests. This work provides an approach to obtain greater resolution of the rare variant signals within significant aggregate sets; this information can provide an objective measure to prioritize variants for follow-up experimental studies and insight into the biological pathways involved.

在重要的总体罕见变异测试中识别有影响的变异。
导言:研究罕见变异在简单和复杂疾病中的作用越来越常见。尽管在集合中测试罕见变异的常规方法比测试单个变异更有效,但确定哪些变异可能是关联的驱动因素仍是令人感兴趣的。我们提出了一种新方法,通过量化变异对关联性综合测试的影响,在显著的综合测试后对罕见变异进行优先排序:除了提供用于对变异体进行排序的测量方法外,我们还利用离群点检测方法提出了计算效率高的罕见变异体影响过滤工具(RIFT),以确定影响疾病关联的变异体子集。我们评估了几种离群点检测方法,这些方法根据基础方差测量而有所不同:四分位数间距(Tukey 栅栏)、中位数绝对偏差和 SD。我们对 50 个大小为 3 kb 的区域进行了 1000 次模拟,并比较了真阳性率和假阳性率。我们将使用内Tukey的RIFT与现有的两种方法进行了比较:P值自适应组合(ADA)和贝叶斯分层模型(BeviMed)。最后,我们将该方法应用于特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的靶向重测序研究数据:结果:与非常罕见的变异(MAF 讨论)相比,所有离群点检测方法对检测不常见变异(0.001 < 小等位基因频率,MAF > 0.03)的灵敏度都更高:总之,RIFT 在识别影响罕见变异关联测试的多态性时具有较高的真阳性率,同时保持较低的假阳性率。这项工作提供了一种方法,可在重要的集合中获得更高的罕见变异信号分辨率;这一信息可提供一种客观的衡量标准,用于确定后续实验研究中变异的优先次序,并深入了解相关的生物通路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Heredity
Human Heredity 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gathering original research reports and short communications from all over the world, ''Human Heredity'' is devoted to methodological and applied research on the genetics of human populations, association and linkage analysis, genetic mechanisms of disease, and new methods for statistical genetics, for example, analysis of rare variants and results from next generation sequencing. The value of this information to many branches of medicine is shown by the number of citations the journal receives in fields ranging from immunology and hematology to epidemiology and public health planning, and the fact that at least 50% of all ''Human Heredity'' papers are still cited more than 8 years after publication (according to ISI Journal Citation Reports). Special issues on methodological topics (such as ‘Consanguinity and Genomics’ in 2014; ‘Analyzing Rare Variants in Complex Diseases’ in 2012) or reviews of advances in particular fields (‘Genetic Diversity in European Populations: Evolutionary Evidence and Medical Implications’ in 2014; ‘Genes and the Environment in Obesity’ in 2013) are published every year. Renowned experts in the field are invited to contribute to these special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信