A systematic assessment of photon-counting CT for bone mineral density and microarchitecture quantifications.

Cindy McCabe, Thomas J Sauer, Mojtaba Zarei, W Paul Segars, Ehsan Samei, Ehsan Abadi
{"title":"A systematic assessment of photon-counting CT for bone mineral density and microarchitecture quantifications.","authors":"Cindy McCabe, Thomas J Sauer, Mojtaba Zarei, W Paul Segars, Ehsan Samei, Ehsan Abadi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photon-counting CT (PCCT) is an emerging imaging technology with potential improvements in quantification and rendition of micro-structures due to its smaller detector sizes. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a new PCCT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) in quantifying clinically relevant bone imaging biomarkers for characterization of common bone diseases. We evaluated the ability of PCCT in quantifying microarchitecture in bones compared to conventional energy-integrating CT. The quantifications were done through virtual imaging trials, using a 50 percentile BMI male virtual patient, with a detailed model of trabecular bone with varied bone densities in the lumbar spine. The virtual patient was imaged using a validated CT simulator (DukeSim) at CTDI<sub>vol</sub> of 20 and 40 mGy for three scan modes: ultra-high-resolution PCCT (UHR-PCCT), high-resolution PCCT (HR-PCCT), and a conventional energy-integrating CT (EICT) (FORCE, Siemens). Further, each scan mode was reconstructed with varying parameters to evaluate their effect on quantification. Bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular volume to total bone volume (BV/TV), and radiomics texture features were calculated in each vertebra. The most accurate BMD measurements relative to the ground truth were UHR-PCCT images (error: 3.3% ± 1.5%), compared to HR-PCCT (error: 5.3% ± 2.0%) and EICT (error: 7.1% ± 2.0%). UHR-PCCT images outperformed EICT and HR-PCCT. In BV/TV quantifications, UHR-PCCT (errors of 29.7% ± 11.8%) outperformed HR-PCCT (error: 80.6% ± 31.4%) and EICT (error: 67.3% ± 64.3). UHR-PCCT and HR-PCCT texture features were sensitive to anatomical changes using the sharpest kernel. Conversely, the texture radiomics showed no clear trend to reflect the progression of the disease in EICT. This study demonstrated the potential utility of PCCT technology in improved performance of bone quantifications leading to more accurate characterization of bone diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":74505,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering","volume":"12463 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10142096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photon-counting CT (PCCT) is an emerging imaging technology with potential improvements in quantification and rendition of micro-structures due to its smaller detector sizes. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a new PCCT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) in quantifying clinically relevant bone imaging biomarkers for characterization of common bone diseases. We evaluated the ability of PCCT in quantifying microarchitecture in bones compared to conventional energy-integrating CT. The quantifications were done through virtual imaging trials, using a 50 percentile BMI male virtual patient, with a detailed model of trabecular bone with varied bone densities in the lumbar spine. The virtual patient was imaged using a validated CT simulator (DukeSim) at CTDIvol of 20 and 40 mGy for three scan modes: ultra-high-resolution PCCT (UHR-PCCT), high-resolution PCCT (HR-PCCT), and a conventional energy-integrating CT (EICT) (FORCE, Siemens). Further, each scan mode was reconstructed with varying parameters to evaluate their effect on quantification. Bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular volume to total bone volume (BV/TV), and radiomics texture features were calculated in each vertebra. The most accurate BMD measurements relative to the ground truth were UHR-PCCT images (error: 3.3% ± 1.5%), compared to HR-PCCT (error: 5.3% ± 2.0%) and EICT (error: 7.1% ± 2.0%). UHR-PCCT images outperformed EICT and HR-PCCT. In BV/TV quantifications, UHR-PCCT (errors of 29.7% ± 11.8%) outperformed HR-PCCT (error: 80.6% ± 31.4%) and EICT (error: 67.3% ± 64.3). UHR-PCCT and HR-PCCT texture features were sensitive to anatomical changes using the sharpest kernel. Conversely, the texture radiomics showed no clear trend to reflect the progression of the disease in EICT. This study demonstrated the potential utility of PCCT technology in improved performance of bone quantifications leading to more accurate characterization of bone diseases.

光子计数 CT 用于骨矿物质密度和微结构量化的系统性评估。
光子计数 CT(PCCT)是一种新兴的成像技术,由于其探测器尺寸较小,在量化和呈现微观结构方面具有潜在的改进空间。本研究旨在评估新型 PCCT 扫描仪(NAEOTOM Alpha,西门子)在量化临床相关骨成像生物标志物以确定常见骨病特征方面的性能。与传统的能量积分 CT 相比,我们评估了 PCCT 在量化骨骼微结构方面的能力。量化是通过虚拟成像试验完成的,使用的是一位体重指数为 50% 的男性虚拟患者,他的腰椎骨有一个不同骨密度的详细骨小梁模型。虚拟病人使用经过验证的 CT 模拟器(DukeSim)进行成像,CTDIvol 为 20 和 40 mGy,有三种扫描模式:超高分辨率 PCCT(UHR-PCCT)、高分辨率 PCCT(HR-PCCT)和传统能量整合 CT(EICT)(FORCE,西门子)。此外,每种扫描模式都使用不同的参数进行重建,以评估其对量化的影响。计算了每个椎体的骨矿密度(BMD)、骨小梁体积与骨总量之比(BV/TV)以及放射组学纹理特征。相对于地面实况,UHR-PCCT 图像的骨密度测量结果最准确(误差:3.3% ± 1.5%),而 HR-PCCT 图像(误差:5.3% ± 2.0%)和 EICT 图像(误差:7.1% ± 2.0%)的测量结果最不准确。UHR-PCCT 图像的表现优于 EICT 和 HR-PCCT。在 BV/TV 定量方面,UHR-PCCT(误差为 29.7% ± 11.8%)优于 HR-PCCT(误差:80.6% ± 31.4%)和 EICT(误差:67.3% ± 64.3)。UHR-PCCT 和 HR-PCCT 纹理特征对使用最锐利内核的解剖变化很敏感。相反,纹理放射组学在反映 EICT 疾病进展方面没有明显的趋势。这项研究证明了 PCCT 技术在改善骨量化性能方面的潜在用途,从而能更准确地描述骨病的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信