Association between traffic-related air pollution exposure and fertility-assisted births.

Daphne Thampy, Verónica M Vieira
{"title":"Association between traffic-related air pollution exposure and fertility-assisted births.","authors":"Daphne Thampy,&nbsp;Verónica M Vieira","doi":"10.1088/2752-5309/accd10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have suggested that traffic-related air pollution is associated with adverse fertility outcomes, such as reduced fecundability and subfertility. The purpose of this research is to investigate if PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure prior to conception or traffic-related exposures (traffic density and distance to nearest major roadway) at birth address is associated with fertility-assisted births. We obtained all live and still births from the Massachusetts state birth registry with an estimated conception date between January 2002 through December 2008. All births requiring fertility drugs or assisted reproductive technology were identified as cases. We randomly selected 2000 infants conceived each year to serve as a common control group. PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was assessed using 4 km spatial satellite remote sensing, meteorological and land use spatiotemporal models at geocoded birth addresses for the year prior to conception. The mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> level was 9.81 <i>µ</i>g m<sup>-3</sup> (standard deviation = 1.70 <i>µ</i>g m<sup>-3</sup>), with a maximum of 14.27 <i>µ</i>g m<sup>-3</sup>. We calculated crude and adjusted fertility treatment odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) per interquartile range of 1.72 <i>µ</i>g m<sup>-3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. Our final analyses included 10 748 fertility-assisted births and 12 225 controls. After adjusting for parental age, marital status, race, maternal education, insurance status, parity, and year of birth, average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure during the year prior to conception was weakly associated with fertility treatment (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.05). Fertility-assisted births were inversely associated with traffic density (highest quartile compared to lowest quartile, OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.02) and positively associated with distance from major roadway (OR per 100 m: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.02) in adjusted analyses. We did not find strong evidence to support an adverse relationship between traffic-related air pollution exposure and fertility-assisted births.</p>","PeriodicalId":72938,"journal":{"name":"Environmental research, health : ERH","volume":"1 2","pages":"021005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental research, health : ERH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/accd10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that traffic-related air pollution is associated with adverse fertility outcomes, such as reduced fecundability and subfertility. The purpose of this research is to investigate if PM2.5 exposure prior to conception or traffic-related exposures (traffic density and distance to nearest major roadway) at birth address is associated with fertility-assisted births. We obtained all live and still births from the Massachusetts state birth registry with an estimated conception date between January 2002 through December 2008. All births requiring fertility drugs or assisted reproductive technology were identified as cases. We randomly selected 2000 infants conceived each year to serve as a common control group. PM2.5 exposure was assessed using 4 km spatial satellite remote sensing, meteorological and land use spatiotemporal models at geocoded birth addresses for the year prior to conception. The mean PM2.5 level was 9.81 µg m-3 (standard deviation = 1.70 µg m-3), with a maximum of 14.27 µg m-3. We calculated crude and adjusted fertility treatment odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) per interquartile range of 1.72 µg m-3 increase in PM2.5 exposure. Our final analyses included 10 748 fertility-assisted births and 12 225 controls. After adjusting for parental age, marital status, race, maternal education, insurance status, parity, and year of birth, average PM2.5 exposure during the year prior to conception was weakly associated with fertility treatment (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.05). Fertility-assisted births were inversely associated with traffic density (highest quartile compared to lowest quartile, OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.02) and positively associated with distance from major roadway (OR per 100 m: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.02) in adjusted analyses. We did not find strong evidence to support an adverse relationship between traffic-related air pollution exposure and fertility-assisted births.

与交通有关的空气污染暴露与辅助生育之间的关系。
先前的研究表明,与交通有关的空气污染与不利的生育结果有关,如生育能力降低和生育能力低下。本研究的目的是调查怀孕前的PM2.5暴露或出生地址的交通相关暴露(交通密度和到最近主要道路的距离)是否与辅助生育有关。我们从马萨诸塞州出生登记处获得了所有活产和死产,估计受孕日期在2002年1月至2008年12月之间。所有需要生育药物或辅助生殖技术的分娩都被确定为病例。我们每年随机选择2000名婴儿作为普通对照组。利用4公里空间卫星遥感、气象和土地利用时空模型,对怀孕前一年的地理编码出生地址进行了PM2.5暴露评估。PM2.5均值为9.81µg m-3(标准差为1.70µg m-3),最大值为14.27µg m-3。在PM2.5暴露增加1.72µg m-3的四分位数范围内,我们计算了粗生育治疗和调整生育治疗的优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CI)。我们的最终分析包括10748例辅助生育和12225例对照。在调整了父母年龄、婚姻状况、种族、母亲受教育程度、保险状况、胎次和出生年份等因素后,孕前一年PM2.5平均暴露量与生育治疗呈弱相关(OR: 1.01;95% ci: 0.97, 1.05)。辅助生育与交通密度呈负相关(最高四分位数比最低四分位数,OR: 0.92;95% CI: 0.83, 1.02),并与距离主干道的距离呈正相关(OR每100米:1.01;95% CI: 1.00, 1.02)。我们没有发现强有力的证据来支持交通相关的空气污染暴露与辅助生育之间的不利关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信