WAVES: A Novel Test to Evaluate Visuospatial Construction Ability in a School-aged Population.

Q3 Medicine
Innovations in clinical neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Franco di Cesare, Cristiana di Carlo, Leonardo di Cesare
{"title":"WAVES: A Novel Test to Evaluate Visuospatial Construction Ability in a School-aged Population.","authors":"Franco di Cesare,&nbsp;Cristiana di Carlo,&nbsp;Leonardo di Cesare","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The paucity of valid diagnostic tools is one of the challenges preventing the effective implementation of child cognitive health testing in Sub-Saharan developing countries. WAVES addresses the need for new psychometric tests to evaluate visuospatial construction ability in a school-aged population. WAVES involves the standardized administration of a copy design task that is sequentially repeated by four distinct reproduction modalities: copy design with open eyes (CDO), immediate reproduction from memory with open eyes (IRMO), immediate reproduction from memory with closed eyes (IRMC), and delayed reproduction from memory with closed eyes (DRMC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>WAVES reliability and validity were assessed in a field trial using Classical Test Theory or Item Response Theory (IRT) methods. A total of 445 children, aged 5 to 17 years old, were recruited at multiple Zambian clinical sites and schools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WAVES provides a visuographomotor construction processing (VGCP) index and three subscale inaccuracy of reproduction scores: perseveration, decreased spacing, and changing direction difficulty (CDD). WAVES scores depended on age and showed an age-related increase of reproduction accuracy. Altered visuospatial construction, as indicated by higher scores, was associated with poor health status (i.e., chronic neurologic or medical disease or prolonged exposure to psychosocial stress and deprivation). Reliability estimates, expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; 95% confidence interval [CI]), at test-retest (n=86) were: VGCP Index: 0.94 (0.91, 0.96); perseveration: 0.76 (0.62, 0.84); decreased spacing: 0.86 (0.79, 0.91); and CDD: 0.93 (0.89, 0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WAVES has potential for clinical utility in evaluating the effect of different health conditions on visuospatial construction ability. Study results warrant further research to validate its use in healthcare and clinical research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13635,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","volume":"20 1-3","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132270/pdf/icns_20_1-3_39.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The paucity of valid diagnostic tools is one of the challenges preventing the effective implementation of child cognitive health testing in Sub-Saharan developing countries. WAVES addresses the need for new psychometric tests to evaluate visuospatial construction ability in a school-aged population. WAVES involves the standardized administration of a copy design task that is sequentially repeated by four distinct reproduction modalities: copy design with open eyes (CDO), immediate reproduction from memory with open eyes (IRMO), immediate reproduction from memory with closed eyes (IRMC), and delayed reproduction from memory with closed eyes (DRMC).

Design: WAVES reliability and validity were assessed in a field trial using Classical Test Theory or Item Response Theory (IRT) methods. A total of 445 children, aged 5 to 17 years old, were recruited at multiple Zambian clinical sites and schools.

Results: WAVES provides a visuographomotor construction processing (VGCP) index and three subscale inaccuracy of reproduction scores: perseveration, decreased spacing, and changing direction difficulty (CDD). WAVES scores depended on age and showed an age-related increase of reproduction accuracy. Altered visuospatial construction, as indicated by higher scores, was associated with poor health status (i.e., chronic neurologic or medical disease or prolonged exposure to psychosocial stress and deprivation). Reliability estimates, expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; 95% confidence interval [CI]), at test-retest (n=86) were: VGCP Index: 0.94 (0.91, 0.96); perseveration: 0.76 (0.62, 0.84); decreased spacing: 0.86 (0.79, 0.91); and CDD: 0.93 (0.89, 0.95).

Conclusion: WAVES has potential for clinical utility in evaluating the effect of different health conditions on visuospatial construction ability. Study results warrant further research to validate its use in healthcare and clinical research settings.

WAVES:一种评估学龄人群视觉空间构建能力的新测试。
目标:缺乏有效的诊断工具是阻碍撒哈拉以南发展中国家有效实施儿童认知健康测试的挑战之一。WAVES解决了对新的心理测量测试的需求,以评估学龄人群的视觉空间构建能力。WAVES涉及复制设计任务的标准化管理,该任务由四种不同的复制模式依次重复:睁开眼睛的复制设计(CDO)、睁开眼睛的记忆即时复制(IRMO)、闭着眼睛的记忆立即复制(IRMC)和闭眼的记忆延迟复制(DRMC)。设计:使用经典测试理论或项目反应理论(IRT)方法在现场试验中评估WAVES的信度和有效性。赞比亚多个诊所和学校共招募了445名5至17岁的儿童。结果:WAVES提供了视觉描记器构造处理(VGCP)指数和再现得分的三个分量表不准确性:持续性、间距减小和改变方向难度(CDD)。WAVES评分取决于年龄,并显示出与年龄相关的繁殖准确性增加。更高的分数表明,视觉空间结构的改变与健康状况不佳(即慢性神经或医学疾病或长期暴露于心理社会压力和剥夺)有关。在重新测试时(n=86),以组内相关系数(ICC;95%置信区间[CI])表示的可靠性估计值为:VGCP指数:0.94(0.91,0.96);持久性:0.76(0.62,0.84);间距减小:0.86(0.79,0.91);CDD:0.93(0.89,0.95)。结论:WAVES在评估不同健康状况对视觉空间构建能力的影响方面具有潜在的临床应用价值。研究结果值得进一步研究,以验证其在医疗保健和临床研究环境中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovations in clinical neuroscience
Innovations in clinical neuroscience Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信