p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Martin Köbel, Eun-Young Kang, Ashley Weir, Peter F Rambau, Cheng-Han Lee, Gregg S Nelson, Prafull Ghatage, Nicola S Meagher, Marjorie J Riggan, Jennifer Alsop, Michael S Anglesio, Matthias W Beckmann, Christiani Bisinotto, Michelle Boisen, Jessica Boros, Alison H Brand, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Michael E Carney, Penny Coulson, Madeleine Courtney-Brooks, Kara L Cushing-Haugen, Cezary Cybulski, Suha Deen, Mona A El-Bahrawy, Esther Elishaev, Ramona Erber, Sian Fereday, AOCS Group, Anna Fischer, Simon A Gayther, Arantzazu Barquin-Garcia, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, C Blake Gilks, Helena Gronwald, Marcel Grube, Paul R Harnett, Holly R Harris, Andreas D Hartkopf, Arndt Hartmann, Alexander Hein, Joy Hendley, Brenda Y Hernandez, Yajue Huang, Anna Jakubowska, Mercedes Jimenez-Linan, Michael E Jones, Catherine J Kennedy, Tomasz Kluz, Jennifer M Koziak, Jaime Lesnock, Jenny Lester, Jan Lubiński, Teri A Longacre, Maria Lycke, Constantina Mateoiu, Bryan M McCauley, Valerie McGuire, Britta Ney, Alexander Olawaiye, Sandra Orsulic, Ana Osorio, Luis Paz-Ares, Teresa Ramón y Cajal, Joseph H Rothstein, Matthias Ruebner, Minouk J Schoemaker, Mitul Shah, Raghwa Sharma, Mark E Sherman, Yurii B Shvetsov, Naveena Singh, Helen Steed, Sarah J Storr, Aline Talhouk, Nadia Traficante, Chen Wang, Alice S Whittemore, Martin Widschwendter, Lynne R Wilkens, Stacey J Winham, Javier Benitez, Andrew Berchuck, David D Bowtell, Francisco J Candido dos Reis, Ian Campbell, Linda S Cook, Anna DeFazio, Jennifer A Doherty, Peter A Fasching, Renée T Fortner, María J García, Marc T Goodman, Ellen L Goode, Jacek Gronwald, David G Huntsman, Beth Y Karlan, Linda E Kelemen, Stefan Kommoss, Nhu D Le, Stewart G Martin, Usha Menon, Francesmary Modugno, Paul DP Pharoah, Joellen M Schildkraut, Weiva Sieh, Annette Staebler, Karin Sundfeldt, Anthony J Swerdlow, Susan J Ramus, James D Brenton
{"title":"p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study","authors":"Martin Köbel,&nbsp;Eun-Young Kang,&nbsp;Ashley Weir,&nbsp;Peter F Rambau,&nbsp;Cheng-Han Lee,&nbsp;Gregg S Nelson,&nbsp;Prafull Ghatage,&nbsp;Nicola S Meagher,&nbsp;Marjorie J Riggan,&nbsp;Jennifer Alsop,&nbsp;Michael S Anglesio,&nbsp;Matthias W Beckmann,&nbsp;Christiani Bisinotto,&nbsp;Michelle Boisen,&nbsp;Jessica Boros,&nbsp;Alison H Brand,&nbsp;Angela Brooks-Wilson,&nbsp;Michael E Carney,&nbsp;Penny Coulson,&nbsp;Madeleine Courtney-Brooks,&nbsp;Kara L Cushing-Haugen,&nbsp;Cezary Cybulski,&nbsp;Suha Deen,&nbsp;Mona A El-Bahrawy,&nbsp;Esther Elishaev,&nbsp;Ramona Erber,&nbsp;Sian Fereday,&nbsp;AOCS Group,&nbsp;Anna Fischer,&nbsp;Simon A Gayther,&nbsp;Arantzazu Barquin-Garcia,&nbsp;Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj,&nbsp;C Blake Gilks,&nbsp;Helena Gronwald,&nbsp;Marcel Grube,&nbsp;Paul R Harnett,&nbsp;Holly R Harris,&nbsp;Andreas D Hartkopf,&nbsp;Arndt Hartmann,&nbsp;Alexander Hein,&nbsp;Joy Hendley,&nbsp;Brenda Y Hernandez,&nbsp;Yajue Huang,&nbsp;Anna Jakubowska,&nbsp;Mercedes Jimenez-Linan,&nbsp;Michael E Jones,&nbsp;Catherine J Kennedy,&nbsp;Tomasz Kluz,&nbsp;Jennifer M Koziak,&nbsp;Jaime Lesnock,&nbsp;Jenny Lester,&nbsp;Jan Lubiński,&nbsp;Teri A Longacre,&nbsp;Maria Lycke,&nbsp;Constantina Mateoiu,&nbsp;Bryan M McCauley,&nbsp;Valerie McGuire,&nbsp;Britta Ney,&nbsp;Alexander Olawaiye,&nbsp;Sandra Orsulic,&nbsp;Ana Osorio,&nbsp;Luis Paz-Ares,&nbsp;Teresa Ramón y Cajal,&nbsp;Joseph H Rothstein,&nbsp;Matthias Ruebner,&nbsp;Minouk J Schoemaker,&nbsp;Mitul Shah,&nbsp;Raghwa Sharma,&nbsp;Mark E Sherman,&nbsp;Yurii B Shvetsov,&nbsp;Naveena Singh,&nbsp;Helen Steed,&nbsp;Sarah J Storr,&nbsp;Aline Talhouk,&nbsp;Nadia Traficante,&nbsp;Chen Wang,&nbsp;Alice S Whittemore,&nbsp;Martin Widschwendter,&nbsp;Lynne R Wilkens,&nbsp;Stacey J Winham,&nbsp;Javier Benitez,&nbsp;Andrew Berchuck,&nbsp;David D Bowtell,&nbsp;Francisco J Candido dos Reis,&nbsp;Ian Campbell,&nbsp;Linda S Cook,&nbsp;Anna DeFazio,&nbsp;Jennifer A Doherty,&nbsp;Peter A Fasching,&nbsp;Renée T Fortner,&nbsp;María J García,&nbsp;Marc T Goodman,&nbsp;Ellen L Goode,&nbsp;Jacek Gronwald,&nbsp;David G Huntsman,&nbsp;Beth Y Karlan,&nbsp;Linda E Kelemen,&nbsp;Stefan Kommoss,&nbsp;Nhu D Le,&nbsp;Stewart G Martin,&nbsp;Usha Menon,&nbsp;Francesmary Modugno,&nbsp;Paul DP Pharoah,&nbsp;Joellen M Schildkraut,&nbsp;Weiva Sieh,&nbsp;Annette Staebler,&nbsp;Karin Sundfeldt,&nbsp;Anthony J Swerdlow,&nbsp;Susan J Ramus,&nbsp;James D Brenton","doi":"10.1002/cjp2.311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi-institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of <i>TP53</i> mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–3.47, <i>p</i> = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11–2.22, <i>p</i> = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of <i>TP53</i> mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pathsocjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjp2.311","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjp2.311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi-institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11–2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.

Abstract Image

p53与卵巢癌生存:一项卵巢肿瘤组织分析联合研究
我们的目的是通过来自卵巢肿瘤组织分析(OTTA)联盟的大型多机构队列研究,检测p53表达状态是否与诊断为最常见卵巢癌组织类型(高级别浆液性癌[HGSC]、子宫内膜样癌[EC]和透明细胞癌[CCC])的女性的生存率相关。使用先前验证的免疫组织化学(IHC)检测作为TP53突变存在和功能影响的替代方法,对来自25个参与OTTA研究地点的6,678例组织微阵列患者的p53表达进行了评估。记录了三种异常表达模式(过表达、完全缺失和细胞质)和正常表达模式(野生型)。通过组织型进行生存分析。HGSC中p53异常表达频率为93.4% (4630 / 4957),EC为11.9% (116/973),CCC为11.5%(86/748)。在HGSC中,不同p53异常表达模式的总生存率没有差异。然而,在EC和CCC中,在多因素分析中,与作为参考的正常p53相比,异常p53表达与诊断为EC的女性死亡风险增加相关(风险比[HR] = 2.18, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.36-3.47, p = 0.0011),与CCC相关(HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.22, p = 0.012)。在国际妇产科联合会I/II期EC和CCC中,p53异常也与较短的总生存期有关。我们的研究提供了进一步的证据,通过异常替代p53 IHC模式评估的TP53突变的功能群与HGSC的生存无关。相反,我们证实了异常p53 IHC是EC的一个强有力的独立预后标志物,并首次证明了异常p53 IHC与CCC患者总生存期的独立预后关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信