[CT perfusion combined with energy spectrum imaging to evaluate the short-term efficacy of bronchial arterial chemoembolization for lung cancer].

L Q Lai, G H Lin, W Y Chen, J F Tu, J S Ji
{"title":"[CT perfusion combined with energy spectrum imaging to evaluate the short-term efficacy of bronchial arterial chemoembolization for lung cancer].","authors":"L Q Lai,&nbsp;G H Lin,&nbsp;W Y Chen,&nbsp;J F Tu,&nbsp;J S Ji","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220513-00366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the clinical value of dynamic volumetric CT perfusion combined with energy spectrum imaging in bronchial arterial chemoembolization (BACE) in patients with lung cancer. <b>Methods:</b> The data of 31 patients with lung cancer confirmed by pathology and treated with BACE in Lishui Central Hospital from January 2018 to February 2022 were retrospectively collected, including 23 men and 8 women, aged 31-84 (67) years. All patients received perfusion scans of lesion sites within 1 week before surgery and 1 month after surgery. We collected and compared the changes in preoperative and postoperative perfusion parameters such as blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean through time (MTT), permeability surface (PS) and energy spectrum parameters including arterial phase CT value (CTA), venous phase CT value (CTV), arterial phase iodine concentration (ICA), venous phase of iodine concentration (ICV), arterial standardization iodine concentration (NICA), and intravenous standardized iodine concentration (NICV) to confirm the significance of these parameters in evaluating the short-term efficacy of BACE in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. Data normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and normally distributed measurement data are expressed here as mean ± standard deviation; the independent-samples <i>t</i>-test was used for comparisons between two groups. The measurement data that were not normally distributed are expressed as median (interquartile interval) [<i>M</i> (<i>Q</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>Q</i><sub>3</sub>)], and the comparison between the two groups used the Kruskal-Wallis test. Count data are expressed as cases (%), and comparisons between groups used the <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> test. <b>Results:</b> The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) at 1 month after BACE were 54.8% (17/31) and 96.8% (30/31), respectively. CT perfusion parameters and energy spectrum parameters of patients before and after BACE treatment were compared. The results showed that BF, BV, MTT, ICA, ICV and NICV were significantly decreased after BACE treatment compared with before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant[58.06 (40.47,87.22) vs.23.57(10.92, 36.24) ml·min<sup>-1</sup>·100g<sup>-1</sup>,3.33(2.86,6.09) vs.2.12(1.96,3.61)ml/100g,2.70(2.19,3.88) vs.1.53 (1.12,2.25)s, 3.51 (3.11,4.14)vs.1.74 (1.26,2.50)mg/ml,2.00 (1.30,2.45) vs.1.32(0.92,1.76)mg/ml,0.51(0.42,0.57) vs.0.33(0.23,0.39)](all <i>P<</i>0.05). At the same time, compared with the non-remission group, the study results showed that the difference of parameters in remission group before and after BACE was more obvious, including ΔBF, ΔBV, ΔMTT, ΔPS, ΔCTA, ΔCTV, ΔICA, ΔICV, ΔNICA, ΔNICV were significantly increased, and the difference was statistically significant [36.82(32.38, 45.34) vs.9.50(-1.43, 12.34) ml·min<sup>-1</sup>·100g<sup>-1</sup>,4.46(2.52, 5.79) vs.0.22(-0.76, 4.09) ml/100g,4.22(2.25, 6.77) vs.0.43(-2.53, 1.88) s,10.07 (2.89, 13.13) vs.-2.01(-6.77, 4.28) ml·min<sup>-1</sup>·100g<sup>-1</sup>,14.22(11.88, 20.57) vs.4.18(-5.25, 6.37) HU, 34.6(14.88, 43.15) vs.11.60(0.26, 25.05) HU,0.95(0.54, 1.47) vs.0.11(0.20, 0.59) mg/ml,1.57(1.10, 2.38) vs. 0.26(-0.21, 0.63) mg/ml,0.05(0.03, 0.08) vs.-0.02(-0.04, 0.01),0.18(0.13, 0.21)vs. 0.11(-0.06, 0.16)](all <i>P<</i>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> CT perfusion combined with spectral imaging could effectively evaluate the changes in tumor vascular perfusion in patients with advanced lung cancer before and after BACE treatment, which has important value in judging the short-term efficacy after treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":24000,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua nei ke za zhi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua nei ke za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220513-00366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of dynamic volumetric CT perfusion combined with energy spectrum imaging in bronchial arterial chemoembolization (BACE) in patients with lung cancer. Methods: The data of 31 patients with lung cancer confirmed by pathology and treated with BACE in Lishui Central Hospital from January 2018 to February 2022 were retrospectively collected, including 23 men and 8 women, aged 31-84 (67) years. All patients received perfusion scans of lesion sites within 1 week before surgery and 1 month after surgery. We collected and compared the changes in preoperative and postoperative perfusion parameters such as blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean through time (MTT), permeability surface (PS) and energy spectrum parameters including arterial phase CT value (CTA), venous phase CT value (CTV), arterial phase iodine concentration (ICA), venous phase of iodine concentration (ICV), arterial standardization iodine concentration (NICA), and intravenous standardized iodine concentration (NICV) to confirm the significance of these parameters in evaluating the short-term efficacy of BACE in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. Data normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and normally distributed measurement data are expressed here as mean ± standard deviation; the independent-samples t-test was used for comparisons between two groups. The measurement data that were not normally distributed are expressed as median (interquartile interval) [M (Q1, Q3)], and the comparison between the two groups used the Kruskal-Wallis test. Count data are expressed as cases (%), and comparisons between groups used the χ2 test. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) at 1 month after BACE were 54.8% (17/31) and 96.8% (30/31), respectively. CT perfusion parameters and energy spectrum parameters of patients before and after BACE treatment were compared. The results showed that BF, BV, MTT, ICA, ICV and NICV were significantly decreased after BACE treatment compared with before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant[58.06 (40.47,87.22) vs.23.57(10.92, 36.24) ml·min-1·100g-1,3.33(2.86,6.09) vs.2.12(1.96,3.61)ml/100g,2.70(2.19,3.88) vs.1.53 (1.12,2.25)s, 3.51 (3.11,4.14)vs.1.74 (1.26,2.50)mg/ml,2.00 (1.30,2.45) vs.1.32(0.92,1.76)mg/ml,0.51(0.42,0.57) vs.0.33(0.23,0.39)](all P<0.05). At the same time, compared with the non-remission group, the study results showed that the difference of parameters in remission group before and after BACE was more obvious, including ΔBF, ΔBV, ΔMTT, ΔPS, ΔCTA, ΔCTV, ΔICA, ΔICV, ΔNICA, ΔNICV were significantly increased, and the difference was statistically significant [36.82(32.38, 45.34) vs.9.50(-1.43, 12.34) ml·min-1·100g-1,4.46(2.52, 5.79) vs.0.22(-0.76, 4.09) ml/100g,4.22(2.25, 6.77) vs.0.43(-2.53, 1.88) s,10.07 (2.89, 13.13) vs.-2.01(-6.77, 4.28) ml·min-1·100g-1,14.22(11.88, 20.57) vs.4.18(-5.25, 6.37) HU, 34.6(14.88, 43.15) vs.11.60(0.26, 25.05) HU,0.95(0.54, 1.47) vs.0.11(0.20, 0.59) mg/ml,1.57(1.10, 2.38) vs. 0.26(-0.21, 0.63) mg/ml,0.05(0.03, 0.08) vs.-0.02(-0.04, 0.01),0.18(0.13, 0.21)vs. 0.11(-0.06, 0.16)](all P<0.05). Conclusions: CT perfusion combined with spectral imaging could effectively evaluate the changes in tumor vascular perfusion in patients with advanced lung cancer before and after BACE treatment, which has important value in judging the short-term efficacy after treatment.

[CT灌注联合能谱成像评价支气管动脉化疗栓塞治疗肺癌的近期疗效]。
目的:探讨CT动态容积灌注联合能谱成像在肺癌支气管动脉化疗栓塞(BACE)中的临床应用价值。方法:回顾性收集2018年1月至2022年2月丽水中心医院经病理证实并行BACE治疗的31例肺癌患者的资料,其中男性23例,女性8例,年龄31-84岁(67岁)。所有患者术前1周及术后1个月内均行病变部位灌注扫描。我们收集并比较术前、术后灌注参数的变化,如血流量(BF)、血容量(BV)、平均通过时间(MTT)、通透面(PS)和能谱参数的变化,包括动脉相CT值(CTA)、静脉相CT值(CTV)、动脉相碘浓度(ICA)、静脉相碘浓度(ICV)、动脉标准化碘浓度(NICA)、静脉标准碘浓度(NICV),以证实这些参数在评价BACE治疗晚期肺癌的短期疗效中的意义。采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验检验数据的正态性,正态分布的测量数据在这里表示为平均值±标准差;两组间比较采用独立样本t检验。非正态分布的计量数据用中位数(四分位数间隔)表示[M (Q1, Q3)],两组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。计数数据以例数(%)表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。结果:BACE术后1个月客观缓解率(ORR)为54.8%(17/31),疾病控制率(DCR)为96.8%(30/31)。比较BACE治疗前后患者CT灌注参数及能谱参数。结果表明,BF、BV、MTT, ICA, ICV和NICV确定新基点与治疗前相比,治疗后明显减少,差异具有统计学意义(58.06 (40.47,87.22)vs.23.57 (10.92, 36.24) ml·最低为1·100 g - 1,级3.33 (2.86,6.09)vs.2.12 ml / 100 g (1.96, 3.61), 2.70 (2.19, 3.88) vs.1.53 (1.12, 2.25), 3.51 (3.11, 4.14) vs.1.74毫克/毫升(1.26,2.50),2.00 (1.30,2.45)vs.1.32毫克/毫升(0.92,1.76),0.51 (0.42,0.57)vs.0.33 (0.23, 0.39)] (P0.05)。同时,与non-remission组相比,该研究结果表明,不同的参数在缓解组之前和之后确定新基点更明显,包括ΔBF,ΔBV,ΔMTT,ΔPS,ΔCTA,ΔCTV,ΔICA,ΔICV,ΔNICA,ΔNICV显著增加,和数据具有统计上的显著差异(36.82 (32.38,45.34)vs.9.50 (-1.43, 12.34) ml·最低为1·100 g - 1,级4.46 (2.52,5.79)vs.0.22 ml / 100 g (-0.76, 4.09), 4.22 (2.25, 6.77) vs.0.43 (-2.53, 1.88), 10.07 (2.89,13.13)和- 2.01 (-6.77,4.28)ml·最低为1·100 g - 1,级14.22 (11.88,20.57)vs.4.18 (-5.25, 6.37), 34.6 (14.88, 43.15) vs.11.60 (0.26, 25.05), 0.95 (0.54, 1.47) vs.0.11毫克/毫升(0.20,0.59),1.57(1.10,2.38)和0.26毫克/毫升(-0.21,0.63),0.05(0.03,0.08)和- 0.02 (-0.04,0.01),0.18 (0.13,0.21)vs。0.11(-0.06, 0.16)](均P0.05)。结论:CT灌注联合光谱成像能有效评价晚期肺癌患者BACE治疗前后肿瘤血管灌注的变化,对判断治疗后短期疗效有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信