Psychological Distress in Emergency Department Nurses at Women's and Children's Hospitals During the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Yingying Zhao, Juan Hu
{"title":"Psychological Distress in Emergency Department Nurses at Women's and Children's Hospitals During the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Yingying Zhao,&nbsp;Juan Hu","doi":"10.12659/MSM.940175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND The COVID-19 epidemic has caused a huge amount of occupational stress among emergency department (ED) nurses. They are not only at high risk of infection, but they are also more likely to experience mental health problems. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with psychological distress and resilience among ED nurses. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a multi-center, cross-sectional study using cluster sampling. The survey utilizing a general information questionnaire, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), and 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) was conducted with 374 ED nurses working in 3 women's and children's hospitals in Chengdu, Sichuan, China between November 20 and November 27, 2021. Descriptive analysis, single-factor analysis, and correlation analysis were performed on data. RESULTS The nurses' mean score for the K10 was 20.65±5.99. Three hundred (80.2%) nurses had K10 scores of 16 or above. The nurses' mean score for the CD-RISC-10 was 27.73±6.520. Work hours and work area were the factors associated with psychological distress (F=11.858, P<0.05; F=3.467, P<0.05). Age and work hours were the factors associated with resilience (F=3.231, P<0.05; t=11.937, P<0.05). The K10 score was negatively correlated with the CD-RISC-10 score (P<0.01, r=-0.453). CONCLUSIONS Of the 374 nurses, 80.2% had psychological distress. Nurse managers should consider the factors associated with psychological distress and resilience and take positive measures to relieve the nurses' psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":18276,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","volume":"29 ","pages":"e940175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/39/medscimonit-29-e940175.PMC10321153.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.940175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 epidemic has caused a huge amount of occupational stress among emergency department (ED) nurses. They are not only at high risk of infection, but they are also more likely to experience mental health problems. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with psychological distress and resilience among ED nurses. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a multi-center, cross-sectional study using cluster sampling. The survey utilizing a general information questionnaire, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), and 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) was conducted with 374 ED nurses working in 3 women's and children's hospitals in Chengdu, Sichuan, China between November 20 and November 27, 2021. Descriptive analysis, single-factor analysis, and correlation analysis were performed on data. RESULTS The nurses' mean score for the K10 was 20.65±5.99. Three hundred (80.2%) nurses had K10 scores of 16 or above. The nurses' mean score for the CD-RISC-10 was 27.73±6.520. Work hours and work area were the factors associated with psychological distress (F=11.858, P<0.05; F=3.467, P<0.05). Age and work hours were the factors associated with resilience (F=3.231, P<0.05; t=11.937, P<0.05). The K10 score was negatively correlated with the CD-RISC-10 score (P<0.01, r=-0.453). CONCLUSIONS Of the 374 nurses, 80.2% had psychological distress. Nurse managers should consider the factors associated with psychological distress and resilience and take positive measures to relieve the nurses' psychological distress.

COVID-19流行期间妇幼医院急诊科护士心理困扰的横断面研究
新冠肺炎疫情给急诊科护士带来了巨大的职业压力。他们不仅有很高的感染风险,而且更有可能出现精神健康问题。本研究旨在探讨急诊科护士心理困扰及心理恢复的相关因素。材料和方法这是一项采用整群抽样的多中心横断面研究。本研究于2021年11月20日至27日,采用一般信息问卷、Kessler心理困扰量表(K10)和10项康诺-戴维森弹性量表(CD-RISC-10)对四川省成都市3家妇幼医院的374名急诊科护士进行调查。对数据进行描述性分析、单因素分析和相关性分析。结果护士K10的平均得分为20.65±5.99分。300名(80.2%)护士K10评分在16分及以上。护士CD-RISC-10的平均得分为27.73±6.520。工作时间和工作区域是与心理困扰相关的因素(F=11.858, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信