Efficacy of telerehabilitation for patients after hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-07 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231181632
Takahiro Tsuge, Norio Yamamoto, Shunsuke Taito, Takanori Miura, Daijo Shiratsuchi, Takashi Yorifuji
{"title":"Efficacy of telerehabilitation for patients after hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Takahiro Tsuge, Norio Yamamoto, Shunsuke Taito, Takanori Miura, Daijo Shiratsuchi, Takashi Yorifuji","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231181632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the efficacy of telerehabilitation for patients after hip fracture surgery through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight electronic databases were searched in August 2022. The primary outcomes were mobility outcomes, activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes, and all adverse events, whereas the secondary outcomes were pain, health-related quality of life, and fall efficacy scale score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven randomized controlled trials were eligible for this study. The evidence regarding the effect of telerehabilitation on mobility outcomes (standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.39 to 0.48) and all adverse events (risk ratio: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.62 to 2.21) was very uncertain. A clinically irrelevant but significant mean difference (MD) in ADL outcomes was found (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: 2.63 to 7.01). Telerehabilitation may result in a slight increase in fall efficacy scale score (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.54) and little to no difference in pain (MD: -1.0, 95% CI: -18.31 to 16.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy of telerehabilitation for patients after hip fracture surgery was uncertain with respect to the mobility outcomes, all adverse events, and pain, with no clinically meaningful differences in ADL outcomes. Telerehabilitation may be necessary to be considered for patients after hip fracture surgery to improve their confidence in their ability to perform daily activities without falling. Therefore, medical staff may consider telerehabilitation for hip fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"174-183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231181632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of telerehabilitation for patients after hip fracture surgery through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched in August 2022. The primary outcomes were mobility outcomes, activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes, and all adverse events, whereas the secondary outcomes were pain, health-related quality of life, and fall efficacy scale score.

Results: Seven randomized controlled trials were eligible for this study. The evidence regarding the effect of telerehabilitation on mobility outcomes (standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.39 to 0.48) and all adverse events (risk ratio: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.62 to 2.21) was very uncertain. A clinically irrelevant but significant mean difference (MD) in ADL outcomes was found (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: 2.63 to 7.01). Telerehabilitation may result in a slight increase in fall efficacy scale score (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.54) and little to no difference in pain (MD: -1.0, 95% CI: -18.31 to 16.31).

Conclusions: The efficacy of telerehabilitation for patients after hip fracture surgery was uncertain with respect to the mobility outcomes, all adverse events, and pain, with no clinically meaningful differences in ADL outcomes. Telerehabilitation may be necessary to be considered for patients after hip fracture surgery to improve their confidence in their ability to perform daily activities without falling. Therefore, medical staff may consider telerehabilitation for hip fractures.

髋部骨折术后远程康复的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析来确定髋部骨折术后远程康复的疗效。方法:于2022年8月检索8个电子数据库。主要结局是活动能力结局、日常生活活动(ADL)结局和所有不良事件,而次要结局是疼痛、健康相关生活质量和跌倒疗效量表评分。结果:7个随机对照试验符合本研究。关于远程康复对活动能力结果(标准化平均差(SMD): 0.05, 95%可信区间(CI): -0.39至0.48)和所有不良事件(风险比:1.14,95% CI: 0.62至2.21)的影响的证据非常不确定。ADL结果存在临床不相关但显著的平均差异(MD) (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: 2.63 ~ 7.01)。远程康复可能导致跌倒疗效量表评分略有增加(SMD: 0.26, 95% CI: -0.02 ~ 0.54),疼痛几乎没有差异(MD: -1.0, 95% CI: -18.31 ~ 16.31)。结论:髋部骨折术后远程康复的疗效在活动能力、所有不良事件和疼痛方面不确定,在ADL方面没有临床意义的差异。髋部骨折术后患者可能需要考虑远程康复,以提高他们对日常活动能力的信心,而不会摔倒。因此,对于髋部骨折,医务人员可以考虑远程康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信