Clinical Informatics Approaches to Facilitate Cancer Data Sharing.

Yearbook of medical informatics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-06 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1768721
Sanjay Aneja, Arman Avesta, Hua Xu, Lucila Ohno Machado
{"title":"Clinical Informatics Approaches to Facilitate Cancer Data Sharing.","authors":"Sanjay Aneja, Arman Avesta, Hua Xu, Lucila Ohno Machado","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite growing enthusiasm surrounding the utility of clinical informatics to improve cancer outcomes, data availability remains a persistent bottleneck to progress. Difficulty combining data with protected health information often limits our ability to aggregate larger more representative datasets for analysis. With the rise of machine learning techniques that require increasing amounts of clinical data, these barriers have magnified. Here, we review recent efforts within clinical informatics to address issues related to safely sharing cancer data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a narrative review of clinical informatics studies related to sharing protected health data within cancer studies published from 2018-2022, with a focus on domains such as decentralized analytics, homomorphic encryption, and common data models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical informatics studies that investigated cancer data sharing were identified. A particular focus of the search yielded studies on decentralized analytics, homomorphic encryption, and common data models. Decentralized analytics has been prototyped across genomic, imaging, and clinical data with the most advances in diagnostic image analysis. Homomorphic encryption was most often employed on genomic data and less on imaging and clinical data. Common data models primarily involve clinical data from the electronic health record. Although all methods have robust research, there are limited studies showing wide scale implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decentralized analytics, homomorphic encryption, and common data models represent promising solutions to improve cancer data sharing. Promising results thus far have been limited to smaller settings. Future studies should be focused on evaluating the scalability and efficacy of these methods across clinical settings of varying resources and expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":" ","pages":"104-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite growing enthusiasm surrounding the utility of clinical informatics to improve cancer outcomes, data availability remains a persistent bottleneck to progress. Difficulty combining data with protected health information often limits our ability to aggregate larger more representative datasets for analysis. With the rise of machine learning techniques that require increasing amounts of clinical data, these barriers have magnified. Here, we review recent efforts within clinical informatics to address issues related to safely sharing cancer data.

Methods: We carried out a narrative review of clinical informatics studies related to sharing protected health data within cancer studies published from 2018-2022, with a focus on domains such as decentralized analytics, homomorphic encryption, and common data models.

Results: Clinical informatics studies that investigated cancer data sharing were identified. A particular focus of the search yielded studies on decentralized analytics, homomorphic encryption, and common data models. Decentralized analytics has been prototyped across genomic, imaging, and clinical data with the most advances in diagnostic image analysis. Homomorphic encryption was most often employed on genomic data and less on imaging and clinical data. Common data models primarily involve clinical data from the electronic health record. Although all methods have robust research, there are limited studies showing wide scale implementation.

Conclusions: Decentralized analytics, homomorphic encryption, and common data models represent promising solutions to improve cancer data sharing. Promising results thus far have been limited to smaller settings. Future studies should be focused on evaluating the scalability and efficacy of these methods across clinical settings of varying resources and expertise.

促进癌症数据共享的临床信息学方法。
目标:尽管越来越多的人热衷于利用临床信息学来改善癌症治疗效果,但数据的可用性仍然是阻碍进展的一个长期瓶颈。很难将数据与受保护的健康信息结合起来,这往往限制了我们汇总更具代表性的大型数据集进行分析的能力。随着需要越来越多临床数据的机器学习技术的兴起,这些障碍也随之扩大。在此,我们回顾了临床信息学最近为解决癌症数据安全共享相关问题所做的努力:我们对 2018-2022 年间发表的与共享癌症研究中受保护健康数据相关的临床信息学研究进行了叙述性综述,重点关注分散分析、同态加密和通用数据模型等领域:确定了调查癌症数据共享的临床信息学研究。搜索的一个特别重点是关于分散分析、同态加密和通用数据模型的研究。分散分析法的原型已应用于基因组、成像和临床数据,其中以诊断图像分析方面的进展最大。同态加密最常应用于基因组数据,而较少应用于成像和临床数据。常见的数据模型主要涉及来自电子健康记录的临床数据。虽然所有方法都得到了有力的研究,但显示广泛实施的研究有限:结论:分散分析、同态加密和通用数据模型是改善癌症数据共享的有前途的解决方案。迄今为止,有希望的结果仅限于较小的环境。未来的研究应侧重于评估这些方法在不同资源和专业知识的临床环境中的可扩展性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信