Nurse Engagement in Antibiotic Stewardship Programs: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000372
Cara Thurman Johnson, Laura J Ridge, Amanda J Hessels
{"title":"Nurse Engagement in Antibiotic Stewardship Programs: A Scoping Review of the Literature.","authors":"Cara Thurman Johnson, Laura J Ridge, Amanda J Hessels","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospital-based antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) are an important strategy in combating antibiotic resistance. Four antibiotic stewardship interventions are recommended by the CDC as particularly well-designed to engage nurses. However, there is limited information on whether and how existing hospital-based ASPs reflect these practices.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe how nurses are being engaged in hospital ASPs and to what extent this overlaps with the CDC framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review included studies published in the last 10 years on engaging nurses in hospital-based ASPs. Three databases, PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase, were searched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 195 unique articles. Ten articles were retained for review detailing how nurses are engaged. One CDC recommended intervention, initiating discussion of antibiotic treatment, appeared in nine studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although hospitals are engaging nurses in antibiotic stewardship programs, their selected approaches do not reflect the full breadth of the opportunities identified by the CDC. More detail as to how exactly nurses engage would also be a useful addition to the literature.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>More research is needed on nurse engagement on culturing or testing and penicillin allergy evaluation. Standardized measures should be collected and reported to measure the impact of engaging nurses in ASPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 2","pages":"69-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hospital-based antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) are an important strategy in combating antibiotic resistance. Four antibiotic stewardship interventions are recommended by the CDC as particularly well-designed to engage nurses. However, there is limited information on whether and how existing hospital-based ASPs reflect these practices.

Purpose: To describe how nurses are being engaged in hospital ASPs and to what extent this overlaps with the CDC framework.

Methods: This scoping review included studies published in the last 10 years on engaging nurses in hospital-based ASPs. Three databases, PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase, were searched.

Results: The search yielded 195 unique articles. Ten articles were retained for review detailing how nurses are engaged. One CDC recommended intervention, initiating discussion of antibiotic treatment, appeared in nine studies.

Conclusions: Although hospitals are engaging nurses in antibiotic stewardship programs, their selected approaches do not reflect the full breadth of the opportunities identified by the CDC. More detail as to how exactly nurses engage would also be a useful addition to the literature.

Implications: More research is needed on nurse engagement on culturing or testing and penicillin allergy evaluation. Standardized measures should be collected and reported to measure the impact of engaging nurses in ASPs.

护士参与抗生素监管计划:文献综述。
导言:医院抗生素管理计划(ASP)是抗击抗生素耐药性的一项重要策略。美国疾病预防控制中心推荐了四种抗生素管理干预措施,这些措施经过精心设计,特别适合护士参与。目的:描述护士如何参与医院抗生素管理计划,以及与疾病预防控制中心框架的重叠程度:本范围审查包括过去 10 年中发表的有关护士参与医院 ASP 的研究。检索了 PubMed、CINAHL 和 Embase 三个数据库:结果:检索到 195 篇文章。其中有 10 篇文章详细介绍了护士如何参与其中。九项研究中出现了疾病预防控制中心推荐的一项干预措施,即开始讨论抗生素治疗:尽管医院正在让护士参与抗生素管理计划,但他们所选择的方法并没有反映出疾病预防控制中心所确定的全部机会。关于护士如何参与的更多细节也是对文献的有益补充:需要对护士参与培养或检测以及青霉素过敏评估进行更多研究。应收集和报告标准化措施,以衡量护士参与 ASP 的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信