Unravelling the skillset of point-of-care ultrasound: a systematic review.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine
Tessa A Mulder, Tim van de Velde, Eveline Dokter, Bas Boekestijn, Tycho J Olgers, Martijn P Bauer, Beerend P Hierck
{"title":"Unravelling the skillset of point-of-care ultrasound: a systematic review.","authors":"Tessa A Mulder,&nbsp;Tim van de Velde,&nbsp;Eveline Dokter,&nbsp;Bas Boekestijn,&nbsp;Tycho J Olgers,&nbsp;Martijn P Bauer,&nbsp;Beerend P Hierck","doi":"10.1186/s13089-023-00319-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing number of physicians that are trained in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) warrants critical evaluation and improvement of current training methods. Performing POCUS is a complex task and it is unknown which (neuro)cognitive mechanisms are most important in competence development of this skill. This systematic review was conducted to identify determinants of POCUS competence development that can be used to optimize POCUS training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, PsycINFO and ERIC databases were searched for studies measuring ultrasound (US) skills and aptitude. The papers were divided into three categories: \"Relevant knowledge\", \"Psychomotor ability\" and 'Visuospatial ability'. The 'Relevant knowledge' category was further subdivided in 'image interpretation', 'technical aspects' and 'general cognitive abilities'. Visuospatial ability was subdivided in visuospatial subcategories based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Model of Intelligence v2.2, which includes visuospatial manipulation and visuospatial perception. Post-hoc, a meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>26 papers were selected for inclusion in the review. 15 reported on relevant knowledge with a pooled coefficient of determination of 0.26. Four papers reported on psychomotor abilities, one reported a significant relationship with POCUS competence. 13 papers reported on visuospatial abilities, the pooled coefficient of determination was 0.16.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a lot of heterogeneity in methods to assess possible determinants of POCUS competence and POCUS competence acquisition. This makes it difficult to draw strong conclusions on which determinants should be part of a framework to improve POCUS education. However, we identified two determinants of POCUS competence development: relevant knowledge and visuospatial ability. The content of relevant knowledge could not be retrieved in more depth. For visuospatial ability we used the CHC model as theoretical framework to analyze this skill. We could not point out psychomotor ability as a determinant of POCUS competence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115919/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-023-00319-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing number of physicians that are trained in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) warrants critical evaluation and improvement of current training methods. Performing POCUS is a complex task and it is unknown which (neuro)cognitive mechanisms are most important in competence development of this skill. This systematic review was conducted to identify determinants of POCUS competence development that can be used to optimize POCUS training.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, PsycINFO and ERIC databases were searched for studies measuring ultrasound (US) skills and aptitude. The papers were divided into three categories: "Relevant knowledge", "Psychomotor ability" and 'Visuospatial ability'. The 'Relevant knowledge' category was further subdivided in 'image interpretation', 'technical aspects' and 'general cognitive abilities'. Visuospatial ability was subdivided in visuospatial subcategories based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Model of Intelligence v2.2, which includes visuospatial manipulation and visuospatial perception. Post-hoc, a meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled correlations.

Results: 26 papers were selected for inclusion in the review. 15 reported on relevant knowledge with a pooled coefficient of determination of 0.26. Four papers reported on psychomotor abilities, one reported a significant relationship with POCUS competence. 13 papers reported on visuospatial abilities, the pooled coefficient of determination was 0.16.

Conclusion: There was a lot of heterogeneity in methods to assess possible determinants of POCUS competence and POCUS competence acquisition. This makes it difficult to draw strong conclusions on which determinants should be part of a framework to improve POCUS education. However, we identified two determinants of POCUS competence development: relevant knowledge and visuospatial ability. The content of relevant knowledge could not be retrieved in more depth. For visuospatial ability we used the CHC model as theoretical framework to analyze this skill. We could not point out psychomotor ability as a determinant of POCUS competence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

拆解即时超声技术:系统回顾。
背景:越来越多的医生接受了点护理超声(POCUS)的培训,需要对当前的培训方法进行关键评估和改进。执行POCUS是一项复杂的任务,目前尚不清楚哪种(神经)认知机制在该技能的能力发展中最重要。本系统综述旨在确定POCUS能力发展的决定因素,这些因素可用于优化POCUS培训。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Emcare、PsycINFO、ERIC等数据库,检索有关超声(US)技能和资质的研究。论文分为“相关知识”、“精神运动能力”和“视觉空间能力”三大类。“相关知识”类别进一步细分为“图像解释”、“技术方面”和“一般认知能力”。基于Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC)智能模型v2.2将视觉空间能力细分为视觉空间亚类,包括视觉空间操纵和视觉空间感知。事后,进行荟萃分析以计算合并相关性。结果:26篇论文被纳入综述。相关知识报告数为15,汇总决定系数为0.26。四篇论文报道了精神运动能力,一篇报道了与POCUS能力的显著关系。13篇论文报道了视觉空间能力,合并决定系数为0.16。结论:评价POCUS能力和POCUS能力习得的可能决定因素的方法存在很大的异质性。这使得很难就哪些决定因素应该成为改善POCUS教育框架的一部分得出强有力的结论。然而,我们确定了POCUS能力发展的两个决定因素:相关知识和视觉空间能力。相关知识的内容无法更深入地检索。对于视觉空间能力,我们使用CHC模型作为理论框架来分析这一技能。我们不能指出精神运动能力是POCUS能力的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信