Are Surprise Questions and Probabilistic Questions by Nurses Useful in Home Palliative Care? A Prospective Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sang-Yeon Suh, Seok-Joon Yoon, Cheng-Pei Lin, David Hui
{"title":"Are Surprise Questions and Probabilistic Questions by Nurses Useful in Home Palliative Care? A Prospective Study.","authors":"Sang-Yeon Suh, Seok-Joon Yoon, Cheng-Pei Lin, David Hui","doi":"10.1177/10499091231187355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surprise questions (SQs) are used as screening tools in palliative care. Probabilistic questions (PQs) are more accurate than temporal predictions. However, no study has examined the usefulness of SQs and PQs assessed by nurses. <b>Objectives:</b> To examine the accuracy of nurses' SQ and PQ assessments in patients with advanced cancer receiving home palliative care. <b>Design:</b> A prospective single-center cohort study. <b>Setting/Subjects:</b> Adult patients with advanced cancer who received palliative care at home in South Korea between 2019 and 2020. <b>Measurements:</b> Palliative care specialized nurses were asked the SQ, \"Would you be surprised if the patient died in a specific timeframe?\" and PQ, \"What is the probability that this patient will be alive (0 to 100%) within a specific timeframe?\" at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-week timeframes at enrollment. We calculated the sensitivities and specificities of the SQs and PQs. <b>Results:</b> 81 patients were recruited with 47 days of median survival. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy (OA) of the 1-week SQ were 50.0, 93.2, and 88.9%, respectively. The accuracies for the 1-week PQ were 12.5, 100.0, and 91.3%, respectively. The 6-week SQ showed sensitivity, specificity, and OA of 84.6, 42.9, and 62.9%, respectively; the accuracies for the 6-week PQ were 59.0, 66.7, and 63.0%, respectively.<b>Conclusion:</b> The SQ and PQ showed acceptable accuracy in home palliative care patients. Interestingly, PQ showed higher specificity than SQ at all timeframes. The SQ and PQ assessed by nurses may be useful in providing additional prognostic information for home palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"431-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231187355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surprise questions (SQs) are used as screening tools in palliative care. Probabilistic questions (PQs) are more accurate than temporal predictions. However, no study has examined the usefulness of SQs and PQs assessed by nurses. Objectives: To examine the accuracy of nurses' SQ and PQ assessments in patients with advanced cancer receiving home palliative care. Design: A prospective single-center cohort study. Setting/Subjects: Adult patients with advanced cancer who received palliative care at home in South Korea between 2019 and 2020. Measurements: Palliative care specialized nurses were asked the SQ, "Would you be surprised if the patient died in a specific timeframe?" and PQ, "What is the probability that this patient will be alive (0 to 100%) within a specific timeframe?" at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-week timeframes at enrollment. We calculated the sensitivities and specificities of the SQs and PQs. Results: 81 patients were recruited with 47 days of median survival. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy (OA) of the 1-week SQ were 50.0, 93.2, and 88.9%, respectively. The accuracies for the 1-week PQ were 12.5, 100.0, and 91.3%, respectively. The 6-week SQ showed sensitivity, specificity, and OA of 84.6, 42.9, and 62.9%, respectively; the accuracies for the 6-week PQ were 59.0, 66.7, and 63.0%, respectively.Conclusion: The SQ and PQ showed acceptable accuracy in home palliative care patients. Interestingly, PQ showed higher specificity than SQ at all timeframes. The SQ and PQ assessed by nurses may be useful in providing additional prognostic information for home palliative care.

护士提出的惊喜问题和概率问题在居家姑息关怀中有用吗?一项前瞻性研究。
背景:惊喜问题(SQs)被用作姑息治疗的筛查工具。概率问题(PQs)比时间预测更准确。然而,还没有研究对由护士评估的 SQ 和 PQ 的有用性进行研究。研究目的研究护士对接受居家姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者的 SQ 和 PQ 评估的准确性。设计:前瞻性单中心队列研究。设置/受试者:2019年至2020年间在韩国接受居家姑息治疗的晚期癌症成年患者。测量姑息治疗专科护士在入组时的 1、2、4 和 6 周时间框架内被问及 SQ "如果患者在特定时间框架内死亡,您会感到惊讶吗?"和 PQ "该患者在特定时间框架内存活的概率是多少(0 到 100%)?"。我们计算了 SQ 和 PQ 的敏感性和特异性。结果共招募了 81 名患者,中位生存期为 47 天。1 周 SQ 的灵敏度、特异性和总体准确性(OA)分别为 50.0%、93.2% 和 88.9%。1 周 PQ 的准确率分别为 12.5%、100.0% 和 91.3%。6 周 SQ 的灵敏度、特异性和 OA 分别为 84.6%、42.9% 和 62.9%;6 周 PQ 的准确度分别为 59.0%、66.7% 和 63.0%:SQ和PQ在居家姑息治疗患者中表现出了可接受的准确性。有趣的是,在所有时间框架内,PQ 的特异性均高于 SQ。由护士评估的SQ和PQ可能有助于为居家姑息治疗提供额外的预后信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信