Thoracic spinal postures and mobility in patients with cervicogenic headache versus asymptomatic healthy controls: A longitudinal study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2232858
Sarah Mingels, Wim Dankaerts, Ludo van Etten, Liesbeth Bruckers, Marita Granitzer
{"title":"Thoracic spinal postures and mobility in patients with cervicogenic headache versus asymptomatic healthy controls: A longitudinal study.","authors":"Sarah Mingels, Wim Dankaerts, Ludo van Etten, Liesbeth Bruckers, Marita Granitzer","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2232858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies analyzing postures and mobility of the thoracic spine in the context of cervicogenic headache are missing. Insight in these parameters is needed since the cervical and thoracic spine are biomechanically related.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare self-perceived optimal and habitual postures, active-assisted maximal range of motion, and repositioning error of the upper-thoracic and lower-thoracic spine between a cervicogenic headache-group and matched healthy control-group before and after a 30 min-laptop-task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-randomized longitudinal design was used to compare thoracic postures and mobility between 18 participants with cervicogenic headache (29-51 years) and 18 matched healthy controls (26-52 years). Outcomes were: self-perceived optimal and habitual postures, active-assisted maximal range of motion, and repositioning error of the upper-thoracic and lower-thoracic spine evaluated in sitting with a 3D-Vicon motion analysis system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Habitual upper-thoracic postures in the cervicogenic headache-group were significantly (<i>p</i> = .04) less located toward the maximal range of motion for flexion compared to the control-group, self-perceived optimal upper-thoracic posture was significantly (<i>p</i> = .004) more extended in the cervicogenic headache-group compared to the control-group, and self-perceived optimal lower-thoracic posture could not be reestablished in the cervicogenic headache-group after the laptop-task (<i>p</i> = .009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic postures differ between a cervicogenic headache-group and control-group. These differences were detected by expressing the habitual thoracic posture relative to its maximal range of motion, and by analyzing the possibility of repositioning the thoracic spine after a headache provoking activity. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the contribution of these musculoskeletal dysfunctions to the pathophysiology of cervicogenic headache.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1990-2003"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2232858","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies analyzing postures and mobility of the thoracic spine in the context of cervicogenic headache are missing. Insight in these parameters is needed since the cervical and thoracic spine are biomechanically related.

Objective: To compare self-perceived optimal and habitual postures, active-assisted maximal range of motion, and repositioning error of the upper-thoracic and lower-thoracic spine between a cervicogenic headache-group and matched healthy control-group before and after a 30 min-laptop-task.

Methods: A non-randomized longitudinal design was used to compare thoracic postures and mobility between 18 participants with cervicogenic headache (29-51 years) and 18 matched healthy controls (26-52 years). Outcomes were: self-perceived optimal and habitual postures, active-assisted maximal range of motion, and repositioning error of the upper-thoracic and lower-thoracic spine evaluated in sitting with a 3D-Vicon motion analysis system.

Results: Habitual upper-thoracic postures in the cervicogenic headache-group were significantly (p = .04) less located toward the maximal range of motion for flexion compared to the control-group, self-perceived optimal upper-thoracic posture was significantly (p = .004) more extended in the cervicogenic headache-group compared to the control-group, and self-perceived optimal lower-thoracic posture could not be reestablished in the cervicogenic headache-group after the laptop-task (p = .009).

Conclusion: Thoracic postures differ between a cervicogenic headache-group and control-group. These differences were detected by expressing the habitual thoracic posture relative to its maximal range of motion, and by analyzing the possibility of repositioning the thoracic spine after a headache provoking activity. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the contribution of these musculoskeletal dysfunctions to the pathophysiology of cervicogenic headache.

颈源性头痛患者与无症状健康对照组的胸椎姿势和活动度:纵向研究。
简介目前还没有针对颈源性头痛的胸椎姿势和活动度进行分析的研究。由于颈椎和胸椎在生物力学上是相关的,因此需要对这些参数进行深入了解:比较颈源性头痛组和匹配的健康对照组在 30 分钟笔记本电脑任务前后的自我感觉最佳姿势和习惯姿势、主动辅助最大运动范围以及上胸椎和下胸椎的重新定位误差:采用非随机纵向设计,比较了 18 名颈源性头痛患者(29-51 岁)和 18 名匹配的健康对照组患者(26-52 岁)的胸椎姿势和活动度。研究结果包括:自我感觉的最佳姿势和习惯性姿势、主动辅助最大活动范围以及坐姿时使用 3D-Vicon 运动分析系统评估的上胸椎和下胸椎的重新定位误差:结果:与对照组相比,颈源性头痛组的习惯性上胸椎姿势明显(p = .04)偏离最大屈曲运动范围,颈源性头痛组的自我感觉最佳上胸椎姿势明显(p = .004)偏离最大伸展运动范围,颈源性头痛组的自我感觉最佳上胸椎姿势明显(p = .004)偏离最大伸展运动范围,颈源性头痛组的自我感觉最佳上胸椎姿势明显(p = .与对照组相比,颈源性头痛组的自我感觉最佳上胸椎姿势的伸展幅度更大(p = .004);颈源性头痛组的自我感觉最佳下胸椎姿势在笔记本电脑任务后无法恢复(p = .009):结论:颈源性头痛组与对照组的胸廓姿势存在差异。结论:颈源性头痛组和对照组之间的胸椎姿势存在差异,这些差异是通过表达习惯胸椎姿势相对于其最大运动范围,以及分析在头痛诱发活动后重新定位胸椎的可能性而发现的。要确定这些肌肉骨骼功能障碍对颈源性头痛病理生理学的影响,还需要进行纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信