Comparison of methods for the isolation and culture of Migratory chondroprogenitors from Human articular cartilage.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Elizabeth Vinod, Ganesh Parasuraman, Abel Livingston, Soosai Manickam Amirtham, Grace Rebekah, J Jeya Lisha, Alfred Job Daniel, Solomon Sathishkumar
{"title":"Comparison of methods for the isolation and culture of Migratory chondroprogenitors from Human articular cartilage.","authors":"Elizabeth Vinod,&nbsp;Ganesh Parasuraman,&nbsp;Abel Livingston,&nbsp;Soosai Manickam Amirtham,&nbsp;Grace Rebekah,&nbsp;J Jeya Lisha,&nbsp;Alfred Job Daniel,&nbsp;Solomon Sathishkumar","doi":"10.1080/03008207.2023.2202266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Resident articular stem cells isolated using a migratory assay called Migratory Chondroprogenitors (MCPs) have emerged as a promising cellular therapeutic for the treatment of cartilage pathologies. In-vivo studies using MCPs report their superiority over bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes for treating chondral defects. However, there is no consensus on their isolation protocol. This study aimed to compare four reported isolation methods of MCPs and identify the optimal and feasible protocol for future translational work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human MCPs isolated from osteoarthritic cartilage (<i>n</i> = 3) were divided into four groups: a) MCP1: 8-15 mm cartilage explants, b) MCP2: 8-10 mm explants digested in 0.1% collagenase for 2 hrs. and cultured c) MCP3: 1 mm cartilage explants and d) MCP 4: 25 mm explants with a X tear, 7-day culture, and trypsinization to release migrated cells. The MCPs were subjected to the following analysis: growth kinetics, surface marker expression, mRNA gene expression for markers of chondrogenesis and hypertrophy, and trilineage differentiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MCPs isolated via the four methods showed similar surface marker profiles, chondrogenic (SOX-9, ACAN, COL2A1) and hypertrophic (COL1, RUNX2) gene expression. The migration time for the MCP3 group was the longest. The MCP1, MCP2, and MCP4 groups produced MCPs with comparable cellular expansion feasibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCPs can be preferably isolated by the any of the three above methods based on the investigator's discretion. In the case of small cartilage samples similar to the MCP3 group, the isolation of MCP is plausible, keeping in mind the additional time required.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03008207.2023.2202266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Resident articular stem cells isolated using a migratory assay called Migratory Chondroprogenitors (MCPs) have emerged as a promising cellular therapeutic for the treatment of cartilage pathologies. In-vivo studies using MCPs report their superiority over bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes for treating chondral defects. However, there is no consensus on their isolation protocol. This study aimed to compare four reported isolation methods of MCPs and identify the optimal and feasible protocol for future translational work.

Methods: Human MCPs isolated from osteoarthritic cartilage (n = 3) were divided into four groups: a) MCP1: 8-15 mm cartilage explants, b) MCP2: 8-10 mm explants digested in 0.1% collagenase for 2 hrs. and cultured c) MCP3: 1 mm cartilage explants and d) MCP 4: 25 mm explants with a X tear, 7-day culture, and trypsinization to release migrated cells. The MCPs were subjected to the following analysis: growth kinetics, surface marker expression, mRNA gene expression for markers of chondrogenesis and hypertrophy, and trilineage differentiation.

Results: MCPs isolated via the four methods showed similar surface marker profiles, chondrogenic (SOX-9, ACAN, COL2A1) and hypertrophic (COL1, RUNX2) gene expression. The migration time for the MCP3 group was the longest. The MCP1, MCP2, and MCP4 groups produced MCPs with comparable cellular expansion feasibility.

Conclusions: MCPs can be preferably isolated by the any of the three above methods based on the investigator's discretion. In the case of small cartilage samples similar to the MCP3 group, the isolation of MCP is plausible, keeping in mind the additional time required.

人关节软骨迁移软骨祖细胞分离与培养方法的比较。
目的:利用一种叫做迁移软骨祖细胞(MCPs)的迁移实验分离的常驻关节干细胞已经成为一种有前途的软骨病变的细胞治疗方法。体内研究表明,MCPs在治疗软骨缺损方面优于骨髓间充质干细胞和软骨细胞。然而,对它们的隔离协议没有达成共识。本研究旨在比较四种报道的MCPs分离方法,并为未来的转化工作确定最佳可行的方案。方法:从骨关节炎软骨中分离的人MCPs (n = 3)分为4组:a) MCP1: 8- 15mm软骨外植体,b) MCP2: 8- 10mm外植体,经0.1%胶原酶消化2h。c) MCP3: 1 mm软骨外植体和d) mcp4: 25 mm外植体,X撕裂,培养7天,胰蛋白酶化以释放迁移的细胞。对MCPs进行以下分析:生长动力学、表面标记物表达、软骨形成和肥大标记物mRNA基因表达以及三龄分化。结果:通过四种方法分离的MCPs具有相似的表面标记谱、软骨形成(SOX-9、ACAN、COL2A1)和增生性(COL1、RUNX2)基因表达。MCP3组的迁移时间最长。MCP1、MCP2和MCP4组产生的MCPs具有相当的细胞扩增可行性。结论:根据研究者的判断,采用上述三种方法中的任何一种都可以较好地分离mcp。在类似于MCP3组的小软骨样本的情况下,MCP的分离是合理的,记住需要额外的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信