Exploring the Association of State Policies and the Trajectories of Buprenorphine Prescriber Patient Caseloads.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Substance abuse Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1177/08897077231179824
Beth Ann Griffin, Irineo Cabreros, Brendan Saloner, Adam J Gordon, Rose Kerber, Bradley D Stein
{"title":"Exploring the Association of State Policies and the Trajectories of Buprenorphine Prescriber Patient Caseloads.","authors":"Beth Ann Griffin, Irineo Cabreros, Brendan Saloner, Adam J Gordon, Rose Kerber, Bradley D Stein","doi":"10.1177/08897077231179824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing buprenorphine access is critical to facilitating effective opioid use disorder treatment. Buprenorphine prescriber numbers have increased substantially, but most clinicians who start prescribing buprenorphine stop within a year, and most active prescribers treat very few individuals. Little research has examined state policies' association with the evolution of buprenorphine prescribing clinicians' patient caseloads.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective cohort study design derived from 2006 to 2018 national pharmacy claims identifying buprenorphine prescribers and the number of patients treated monthly. We defined persistent prescribers based on results from a <i>k</i>-clustering approach and were characterized by clinicians who did not quickly stop prescribing and had average monthly caseloads greater than 5 patients for much of the first 6 years after their first dispensed prescription. We examined the association between persistent prescribers (dependent variable) and Medicaid coverage of buprenorphine, prior authorization requirements, and mandated counseling policies (key predictors) that were active within the first 2 years after a prescriber's first observed dispensed buprenorphine prescription. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses and entropy balancing weights to ensure better comparability of prescribers in states that did and did not implement policies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medicaid coverage of buprenorphine was associated with a smaller percentage of new prescribers becoming persistent prescribers (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.53, 0.97). There was no evidence that either mandatory counseling or prior authorization was associated with the odds of a clinician being a persistent prescriber with estimated ORs equal to 0.85 (95% CI = 0.63, 1.16) and 1.13 (95% CI = 0.83, 1.55), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to states without coverage, states with Medicaid coverage for buprenorphine had a smaller percentage of new prescribers become persistent prescribers; there was no evidence that the other state policies were associated with changes in the rate of clinicians becoming persistent prescribers. Because buprenorphine treatment is highly concentrated among a small group of clinicians, it is imperative to increase the pool of clinicians providing care to larger numbers of patients for longer periods. Greater efforts are needed to identify and support factors associated with successful persistent prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":" ","pages":"136-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10680051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08897077231179824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing buprenorphine access is critical to facilitating effective opioid use disorder treatment. Buprenorphine prescriber numbers have increased substantially, but most clinicians who start prescribing buprenorphine stop within a year, and most active prescribers treat very few individuals. Little research has examined state policies' association with the evolution of buprenorphine prescribing clinicians' patient caseloads.

Methods: Our retrospective cohort study design derived from 2006 to 2018 national pharmacy claims identifying buprenorphine prescribers and the number of patients treated monthly. We defined persistent prescribers based on results from a k-clustering approach and were characterized by clinicians who did not quickly stop prescribing and had average monthly caseloads greater than 5 patients for much of the first 6 years after their first dispensed prescription. We examined the association between persistent prescribers (dependent variable) and Medicaid coverage of buprenorphine, prior authorization requirements, and mandated counseling policies (key predictors) that were active within the first 2 years after a prescriber's first observed dispensed buprenorphine prescription. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses and entropy balancing weights to ensure better comparability of prescribers in states that did and did not implement policies.

Results: Medicaid coverage of buprenorphine was associated with a smaller percentage of new prescribers becoming persistent prescribers (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.53, 0.97). There was no evidence that either mandatory counseling or prior authorization was associated with the odds of a clinician being a persistent prescriber with estimated ORs equal to 0.85 (95% CI = 0.63, 1.16) and 1.13 (95% CI = 0.83, 1.55), respectively.

Conclusions: Compared to states without coverage, states with Medicaid coverage for buprenorphine had a smaller percentage of new prescribers become persistent prescribers; there was no evidence that the other state policies were associated with changes in the rate of clinicians becoming persistent prescribers. Because buprenorphine treatment is highly concentrated among a small group of clinicians, it is imperative to increase the pool of clinicians providing care to larger numbers of patients for longer periods. Greater efforts are needed to identify and support factors associated with successful persistent prescribing.

探索国家政策与丁丙诺啡处方患者病例数的关系。
背景:增加丁丙诺啡的使用对促进有效的阿片类药物使用障碍治疗至关重要。丁丙诺啡处方医生的数量大幅增加,但大多数开始开丁丙诺芬处方的临床医生在一年内停止,大多数活跃的处方医生治疗的人很少。很少有研究考察国家政策与丁丙诺啡处方临床医生患者工作量的演变之间的关系。方法:我们的回顾性队列研究设计源于2006年至2018年的国家药房声明,确定了丁丙诺啡处方医生和每月接受治疗的患者人数。我们根据k聚类方法的结果定义了持续开药者,其特征是临床医生不会迅速停止开药,并且在前6个月的大部分时间里,平均每月病例数超过5例 在他们第一次配药几年后。我们研究了持续开处方者(因变量)与丁丙诺啡的医疗补助覆盖率、事先授权要求和前2年内有效的强制性咨询政策(关键预测因素)之间的关系 在一位处方医生首次观察到丁丙诺啡处方数年后。我们使用了多变量逻辑回归分析和熵平衡权重,以确保实施和未实施政策的州的处方医生具有更好的可比性。结果:丁丙诺啡的医疗补助覆盖率与新开处方者成为持续开处方者的比例较小有关(OR = 0.72;95%CI = 0.53,0.97)。没有证据表明,无论是强制性咨询还是事先授权,临床医生都与持续开处方的几率有关,估计or等于0.85(95%可信区间 = 0.63、1.16)和1.13(95%置信区间 = 0.83,1.55)。结论:与没有覆盖的州相比,丁丙诺啡医疗补助覆盖的州新开处方的人成为持续开处方的比例较小;没有证据表明其他州的政策与临床医生成为持续开处方者的比率的变化有关。由于丁丙诺啡治疗高度集中在一小群临床医生中,因此必须增加为更多患者提供长期护理的临床医生队伍。需要更大的努力来识别和支持与成功的持续处方相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信