Validity and application of Doiguchi's pelvic tilt measurement method

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Manabu Tsukamoto , Makoto Kawasaki , Takayuki Nabeshima , Hitoshi Suzuki , Teruaki Fujitani , Ko Chiba , Yuichi Doiguchi , Makoto Osaki , Akinori Sakai
{"title":"Validity and application of Doiguchi's pelvic tilt measurement method","authors":"Manabu Tsukamoto ,&nbsp;Makoto Kawasaki ,&nbsp;Takayuki Nabeshima ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Suzuki ,&nbsp;Teruaki Fujitani ,&nbsp;Ko Chiba ,&nbsp;Yuichi Doiguchi ,&nbsp;Makoto Osaki ,&nbsp;Akinori Sakai","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The validity of Doiguchi's pelvic tilt measurement method has not been proven. The objective in our study was to validate the method.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Our investigation included 73 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed using our cup placement procedure from July 2020 to November 2021. Pelvic tilt formed by the pubic symphysis and sacral promontory (PT</span><sub>PS</sub>) in supine and lateral positions was calculated by two methods (the Doiguchi method and the digital reconstructed radiograph (DRR) method using a 3D computer templating system) based on the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the pelvic ring measured immediately before THA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a strong/moderate correlation in the values of PT<sub>PS</sub> between the Doiguchi and DRR methods. However, the value of PT<sub>PS</sub> calculated by the Doiguchi method was significantly lower than that calculated by DRR, and there was a partially direct match. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the value of PT change from supine to lateral position between the Doiguchi and DRR methods. The PT changes based on both methods were strongly correlated, and the PT change calculated by the Doiguchi method was almost identical to that calculated by the DRR method.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Doiguchi's pelvic tilt measurement method was validated for the first time. These results demonstrated that the ratio of the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the pelvic ring was an important factor defining the change in pelvic tilt. The slope in the linear function of the Doiguchi method was found to be almost the correct value, although the intercept of the linear function exhibited individual differences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S094926582300180X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The validity of Doiguchi's pelvic tilt measurement method has not been proven. The objective in our study was to validate the method.

Methods

Our investigation included 73 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed using our cup placement procedure from July 2020 to November 2021. Pelvic tilt formed by the pubic symphysis and sacral promontory (PTPS) in supine and lateral positions was calculated by two methods (the Doiguchi method and the digital reconstructed radiograph (DRR) method using a 3D computer templating system) based on the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the pelvic ring measured immediately before THA.

Results

There was a strong/moderate correlation in the values of PTPS between the Doiguchi and DRR methods. However, the value of PTPS calculated by the Doiguchi method was significantly lower than that calculated by DRR, and there was a partially direct match. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the value of PT change from supine to lateral position between the Doiguchi and DRR methods. The PT changes based on both methods were strongly correlated, and the PT change calculated by the Doiguchi method was almost identical to that calculated by the DRR method.

Conclusions

Doiguchi's pelvic tilt measurement method was validated for the first time. These results demonstrated that the ratio of the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the pelvic ring was an important factor defining the change in pelvic tilt. The slope in the linear function of the Doiguchi method was found to be almost the correct value, although the intercept of the linear function exhibited individual differences.

土居骨盆倾斜测量法的有效性和应用。
背景:Doiguchi 骨盆倾斜测量方法的有效性尚未得到证实。我们的研究旨在验证该方法的有效性:我们的调查包括 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 11 月期间使用我们的髋臼杯置入术进行的 73 例全髋关节置换术(THA)。在仰卧位和侧卧位时,耻骨联合和骶骨突出部(PTPS)形成的骨盆倾斜度通过两种方法计算得出(土渊法和使用三维计算机模板系统的数字重建X光片(DRR)法),计算的依据是在全髋关节置换术前测量的骨盆环的横向和纵向直径:Doiguchi法和DRR法的PTPS值有很强/中等程度的相关性。然而,用土居方法计算出的 PTPS 值明显低于用 DRR 计算出的 PTPS 值,两者有部分直接匹配。另一方面,从仰卧位到侧卧位的 PT 变化值在土居方法和 DRR 方法之间没有显著差异。两种方法计算出的 PT 变化值具有很强的相关性,土居方法计算出的 PT 变化值与 DRR 方法计算出的 PT 变化值几乎完全一致:结论:首次验证了土口骨盆倾斜测量方法。这些结果表明,骨盆环横向和纵向直径的比值是决定骨盆倾斜度变化的重要因素。尽管线性函数的截距表现出个体差异,但发现土居方法线性函数的斜率几乎是正确的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信