Facial morphology differences in monozygotic twins: a retrospective stereophotogrammetric study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Elvan Onem Ozbilen, Ece Basal, Hanife Nuray Yilmaz, Sibel Biren
{"title":"Facial morphology differences in monozygotic twins: a retrospective stereophotogrammetric study.","authors":"Elvan Onem Ozbilen, Ece Basal, Hanife Nuray Yilmaz, Sibel Biren","doi":"10.2319/120722-840.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess soft tissue differences between monozygotic twins (MZ) for the total face and between facial regions using three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry and quantitative surface-based 3D deviation analyses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study sample consisted of 14 untreated MZ twins (6 males, 8 females, mean age: 14.75 years) from the archive of Marmara University, Department of Orthodontics. The images were taken by the 3dMDface system, and 3dMDvultus software was used for removal of undesired areas and approximation of the images. Then, stereolithography (.stl) format images were superimposed using the best-fit algorithm using 3-matic software. The face was divided into facial thirds, and upper lip and lower lip + chin regions were created. For the comparison, 3D deviation analyses were performed, and a color map and histogram were created. The data were presented as mean deviation, root mean square (RMS), median, and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between the facial thirds, there was no significant difference in soft tissue differences for mean deviation. A statistically significant difference was found between the upper and lower face for the RMS value. For the comparison of upper lip and lower lip + chin region, the only significant difference was for the RMS. When the data were presented as median and interquartile range, there were no statistically significant differences between any facial regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower facial third and lower lip + chin regions had the greatest differences within MZ twin pairs. The genetic and environmental influences might not be the same for different parts of the face.</p>","PeriodicalId":50790,"journal":{"name":"Angle Orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"706-711"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/120722-840.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess soft tissue differences between monozygotic twins (MZ) for the total face and between facial regions using three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry and quantitative surface-based 3D deviation analyses.

Materials and methods: The study sample consisted of 14 untreated MZ twins (6 males, 8 females, mean age: 14.75 years) from the archive of Marmara University, Department of Orthodontics. The images were taken by the 3dMDface system, and 3dMDvultus software was used for removal of undesired areas and approximation of the images. Then, stereolithography (.stl) format images were superimposed using the best-fit algorithm using 3-matic software. The face was divided into facial thirds, and upper lip and lower lip + chin regions were created. For the comparison, 3D deviation analyses were performed, and a color map and histogram were created. The data were presented as mean deviation, root mean square (RMS), median, and interquartile range.

Results: Between the facial thirds, there was no significant difference in soft tissue differences for mean deviation. A statistically significant difference was found between the upper and lower face for the RMS value. For the comparison of upper lip and lower lip + chin region, the only significant difference was for the RMS. When the data were presented as median and interquartile range, there were no statistically significant differences between any facial regions.

Conclusions: Lower facial third and lower lip + chin regions had the greatest differences within MZ twin pairs. The genetic and environmental influences might not be the same for different parts of the face.

同卵双胞胎的面部形态差异:一项回顾性立体摄影测量研究。
目的:利用三维立体摄影测量和基于表面的定量三维偏差分析,评估同卵双胞胎(MZ)全脸和面部区域之间的软组织差异。材料和方法:研究样本包括来自马尔马拉大学正畸系档案馆的14对未经治疗的MZ双胞胎(6男,8女,平均年龄:14.75岁)。图像由3dMDface系统拍摄,3dMDvultus软件用于去除不需要的区域和近似图像。然后,使用3-matic软件使用最佳拟合算法叠加立体光刻(.stl)格式的图像。面部分为面部三分之一,并创建上唇和下唇+下巴区域。为了进行比较,进行了3D偏差分析,并创建了颜色图和直方图。数据以平均偏差、均方根(RMS)、中位数和四分位间距表示。结果:在面部三分之一之间,软组织差异的平均偏差没有显著差异。在RMS值的上表面和下表面之间发现了统计学上显著的差异。对于上唇和下唇+下巴区域的比较,唯一的显著差异是RMS。当数据以中位数和四分位间距表示时,任何面部区域之间都没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:在MZ双胞胎中,下面部第三和下唇+下巴区域的差异最大。面部不同部位的基因和环境影响可能不一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Angle Orthodontist
Angle Orthodontist 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Angle Orthodontist is the official publication of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists and is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September and November by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc. The Angle Orthodontist is the only major journal in orthodontics with a non-commercial, non-profit publisher -- The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation. We value our freedom to operate exclusively in the best interests of our readers and authors. Our website www.angle.org is completely free and open to all visitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信