Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost Implications of Outpatient Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma.

Q1 Medicine
Jessica Marini, Andy Maldonado, Erin Weeda, Amarendra Neppalli, Hamza Hashmi, Kathy Edwards
{"title":"Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost Implications of Outpatient Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Jessica Marini,&nbsp;Andy Maldonado,&nbsp;Erin Weeda,&nbsp;Amarendra Neppalli,&nbsp;Hamza Hashmi,&nbsp;Kathy Edwards","doi":"10.56875/2589-0646.1038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHCT) has become standard care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Outpatient aHCT with high-dose melphalan conditioning has reduced costs and length of hospital stay. This study aimed to highlight the effectiveness, safety, and cost implications of outpatient vs inpatient aHCT at a tertiary academic medical center, as well as the utility of growth factor use in these patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Using an institutional HCT database, a total of 100 patients undergoing aHCT for MM were identified; 50 patients who underwent aHCT in the outpatient setting (chemotherapy and stem cell infusion followed by inpatient admission if needed) were compared with 50 patients in the inpatient setting (chemotherapy and stem cell infusion followed by discharge to outpatient setting). Patients were excluded if the melphalan dose was less than 200 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. Outcomes assessed through retrospective chart review included time to engraftment, incidence of infection, febrile neutropenia, growth factor use, and total length of inpatient stay through day +100.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was shorter in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (14 vs 16 days and 19 vs 21 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Median length of hospital stay was also shorter in the outpatient group (8.5 vs 15.5 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Ninety percent of the outpatient group required admission for neutropenic fever, and 60% of these patients received growth factor support starting at a median of 9 days after stem cell infusion, for a median duration of 4 days. Compared to 16 patients who did not receive growth factor support, these patients had a significantly shorter time to neutrophil recovery (13 days with vs 15 days without growth factor, P = 0.02) and no difference in the total length of hospital stay (8 days with vs 10 days without growth factor, P = 0.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For adult patients with MM undergoing aHCT, the outpatient setting is safe and reduces the total length of hospital stay and thus overall transplant costs. Growth factor support for patients with febrile neutropenia may not reduce length of stay for subsequent hospitalizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":39226,"journal":{"name":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","volume":"16 4","pages":"351-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56875/2589-0646.1038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHCT) has become standard care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Outpatient aHCT with high-dose melphalan conditioning has reduced costs and length of hospital stay. This study aimed to highlight the effectiveness, safety, and cost implications of outpatient vs inpatient aHCT at a tertiary academic medical center, as well as the utility of growth factor use in these patients.

Patients and methods: Using an institutional HCT database, a total of 100 patients undergoing aHCT for MM were identified; 50 patients who underwent aHCT in the outpatient setting (chemotherapy and stem cell infusion followed by inpatient admission if needed) were compared with 50 patients in the inpatient setting (chemotherapy and stem cell infusion followed by discharge to outpatient setting). Patients were excluded if the melphalan dose was less than 200 mg/m2. Outcomes assessed through retrospective chart review included time to engraftment, incidence of infection, febrile neutropenia, growth factor use, and total length of inpatient stay through day +100.

Results: Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was shorter in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (14 vs 16 days and 19 vs 21 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Median length of hospital stay was also shorter in the outpatient group (8.5 vs 15.5 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Ninety percent of the outpatient group required admission for neutropenic fever, and 60% of these patients received growth factor support starting at a median of 9 days after stem cell infusion, for a median duration of 4 days. Compared to 16 patients who did not receive growth factor support, these patients had a significantly shorter time to neutrophil recovery (13 days with vs 15 days without growth factor, P = 0.02) and no difference in the total length of hospital stay (8 days with vs 10 days without growth factor, P = 0.43).

Conclusion: For adult patients with MM undergoing aHCT, the outpatient setting is safe and reduces the total length of hospital stay and thus overall transplant costs. Growth factor support for patients with febrile neutropenia may not reduce length of stay for subsequent hospitalizations.

门诊自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的有效性、安全性和成本影响。
背景与目的:自体造血干细胞移植(aHCT)已成为多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的标准治疗方案。门诊aHCT与大剂量美法仑调节降低了成本和住院时间。本研究旨在强调三级学术医疗中心门诊aHCT与住院aHCT的有效性、安全性和成本影响,以及在这些患者中使用生长因子的效用。患者和方法:使用机构HCT数据库,共确定了100例接受aHCT治疗MM的患者;将50名在门诊接受aHCT的患者(化疗和干细胞输注,必要时住院)与50名住院患者(化疗和干细胞输注,出院到门诊)进行比较。如果美伐兰剂量小于200mg /m2,则排除患者。通过回顾性图表回顾评估的结果包括植入时间、感染发生率、发热性中性粒细胞减少症、生长因子使用和住院总天数。结果:门诊组中性粒细胞和血小板植入时间短于住院组(分别为14天和16天、19天和21天);P < 0.001)。门诊组的中位住院时间也较短(分别为8.5天和15.5天;P < 0.001)。门诊组90%的患者因中性粒细胞减少症发热需要入院治疗,其中60%的患者在干细胞输注后中位9天开始接受生长因子支持,中位持续时间为4天。与未接受生长因子支持的16例患者相比,这些患者的中性粒细胞恢复时间明显缩短(13天vs 15天,P = 0.02),总住院时间无差异(8天vs 10天,P = 0.43)。结论:对于接受aHCT的成年MM患者,门诊设置是安全的,并减少了总住院时间,从而减少了总移植费用。对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的生长因子支持可能不会减少后续住院的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematology Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides a vehicle for publications of high-quality clinical as well as basic science research reports in hematology and oncology. The contents of the journal also emphasize the growing importance of hematopoietic stem cell therapy for treatment of various benign and malignant hematologic disorders and certain solid tumors.The journal prioritizes publication of original research articles but also would give consideration for brief reports, review articles, special communications, and unique case reports. It also offers a special section for clinically relevant images that provide an important educational value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信