The use of nurse checklists in a bedside computer-based information system to focus on avoiding secondary insults in neurointensive care.

ISRN Neurology Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.5402/2012/903954
Lena Nyholm, Anders Lewén, Camilla Fröjd, Tim Howells, Pelle Nilsson, Per Enblad
{"title":"The use of nurse checklists in a bedside computer-based information system to focus on avoiding secondary insults in neurointensive care.","authors":"Lena Nyholm,&nbsp;Anders Lewén,&nbsp;Camilla Fröjd,&nbsp;Tim Howells,&nbsp;Pelle Nilsson,&nbsp;Per Enblad","doi":"10.5402/2012/903954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The feasibility and accuracy of using checklists after every working shift in a bedside computer-based information system for documentation of secondary insults in the neurointensive care unit were evaluated. The ultimate goal was to get maximal attention to avoid secondary insults. Feasibility was investigated by assessing if the checklists were filled in as prescribed. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing the checklists with recorded minute-by-minute monitoring data for intracranial pressure-ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure CPP, systolic blood pressure SBP, and temperature. The total number of checklist assessments was 2,184. In 85% of the shifts, the checklists were filled in. There was significantly longer duration of monitoring time at insult level when Yes was filled in regarding ICP (mean 134 versus 30 min), CPP (mean 125 versus 26 min) and temperature (mean 315 versus 120 min). When a secondary insult was defined as >5% of monitoring time spent at insult level, the sensitivity/specificity for the checklist assessments was 31%/100% for ICP, 38%/99% for CPP, and 66%/88% for temperature. Checklists were feasible and appeared relatively accurate. Checklists may elevate the alertness for avoiding secondary insults and help in the evaluation of the patients. This concept may be the next step towards tomorrow critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14626,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Neurology","volume":"2012 ","pages":"903954"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/903954","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/903954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The feasibility and accuracy of using checklists after every working shift in a bedside computer-based information system for documentation of secondary insults in the neurointensive care unit were evaluated. The ultimate goal was to get maximal attention to avoid secondary insults. Feasibility was investigated by assessing if the checklists were filled in as prescribed. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing the checklists with recorded minute-by-minute monitoring data for intracranial pressure-ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure CPP, systolic blood pressure SBP, and temperature. The total number of checklist assessments was 2,184. In 85% of the shifts, the checklists were filled in. There was significantly longer duration of monitoring time at insult level when Yes was filled in regarding ICP (mean 134 versus 30 min), CPP (mean 125 versus 26 min) and temperature (mean 315 versus 120 min). When a secondary insult was defined as >5% of monitoring time spent at insult level, the sensitivity/specificity for the checklist assessments was 31%/100% for ICP, 38%/99% for CPP, and 66%/88% for temperature. Checklists were feasible and appeared relatively accurate. Checklists may elevate the alertness for avoiding secondary insults and help in the evaluation of the patients. This concept may be the next step towards tomorrow critical care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在基于计算机的床边信息系统中使用护士检查表,以避免神经重症监护中的二次伤害。
评估了在神经重症监护病房的床边计算机信息系统中,在每个轮班后使用核对表记录继发性损伤的可行性和准确性。最终目标是获得最大的关注,以避免二次侮辱。通过评估检查表是否按规定填写来调查可行性。通过将核对表与记录的颅内压- icp、脑灌注压CPP、收缩压SBP和温度的每分钟监测数据进行比较,评估准确性。检查表评估的总数为2 184次。在85%的班次中,检查表被填写了。当在颅内压(ICP)(平均134比30分钟)、CPP(平均125比26分钟)和体温(平均315比120分钟)方面填写Yes时,在侮辱水平的监测时间明显更长。当二次损伤被定义为>5%的监测时间时,检查表评估的敏感性/特异性对ICP为31%/100%,对CPP为38%/99%,对体温为66%/88%。核对表是可行的,而且看起来相对准确。检查表可以提高警觉性,避免继发性损伤,并有助于对患者的评估。这个概念可能是未来重症监护的下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信