A Double-Flipped Virtual Classroom Format for Medical Students Learning Ophthalmology: An Approach to Clinical Rotations in the Context of COVID-19.

S Taylor Brady, Srav Vegunta, Lenora M Olson, Ben J Brintz, Jeff H Pettey, Griffin J Jardine
{"title":"A Double-Flipped Virtual Classroom Format for Medical Students Learning Ophthalmology: An Approach to Clinical Rotations in the Context of COVID-19.","authors":"S Taylor Brady,&nbsp;Srav Vegunta,&nbsp;Lenora M Olson,&nbsp;Ben J Brintz,&nbsp;Jeff H Pettey,&nbsp;Griffin J Jardine","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  The aim of this study was to assess efficacy of a virtual, double-flipped clinical rotation in ophthalmology for medical students during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. <b>Methods</b>  We instituted a virtual, reverse-classroom clinical elective for eight medical students interested in ophthalmology as a career. The course included required prework, interactive case-based discussions, and follow-up quizzes (first flip) entirely prepared and delivered by the students as teachers (second flip). After completion of the course, we surveyed students on five domains: (1) Autonomy and Leadership, (2) Self-Efficacy, (3) Impact on Career Selection, (4) Quality of Educational Experience, and (5) Clear Goals and Feedback using a Likert scale of 1-5 (5 being the most positive). We also asked open-ended questions regarding the overall experience, that is, strengths, weaknesses, and future recommendations for the course. Due to the small N and exploratory nature of the study, no formal statistical inference was performed. <b>Results</b>  Seven students responded to the survey. Aggregated mean survey scores for each domain are represented in parentheses. Responses were very positive in regard to \"Autonomy and Leadership\" (4.5), \"Impact on Career Selection\" (4.1), \"Quality of Educational Experience\" (5.0), and \"Clear Goals and Feedback\" (4.4). \"Self-Efficacy,\" which had an emphasis on ability to perform an eye exam and basic knowledge of ophthalmology, had a lower mean (3.4). The subjective responses were also very positive, but similarly alluded to the limitation of learning examination skills virtually. <b>Conclusions</b>  A medical school clinical elective can be successfully executed in a virtual format with an emphasis on student-directed learning. The novel \"double-flipped\" approach was highly rated by our small sample size. However, there remained a glaring limitation in the ability to transfer clinical skills in the virtual format. In the context of limited in-person contact due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe that the double-flipped, virtual format was a viable replacement for a traditional clinical rotation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 1","pages":"e18-e22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/2d/10-1055-s-0041-1740327.PMC9927982.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose  The aim of this study was to assess efficacy of a virtual, double-flipped clinical rotation in ophthalmology for medical students during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods  We instituted a virtual, reverse-classroom clinical elective for eight medical students interested in ophthalmology as a career. The course included required prework, interactive case-based discussions, and follow-up quizzes (first flip) entirely prepared and delivered by the students as teachers (second flip). After completion of the course, we surveyed students on five domains: (1) Autonomy and Leadership, (2) Self-Efficacy, (3) Impact on Career Selection, (4) Quality of Educational Experience, and (5) Clear Goals and Feedback using a Likert scale of 1-5 (5 being the most positive). We also asked open-ended questions regarding the overall experience, that is, strengths, weaknesses, and future recommendations for the course. Due to the small N and exploratory nature of the study, no formal statistical inference was performed. Results  Seven students responded to the survey. Aggregated mean survey scores for each domain are represented in parentheses. Responses were very positive in regard to "Autonomy and Leadership" (4.5), "Impact on Career Selection" (4.1), "Quality of Educational Experience" (5.0), and "Clear Goals and Feedback" (4.4). "Self-Efficacy," which had an emphasis on ability to perform an eye exam and basic knowledge of ophthalmology, had a lower mean (3.4). The subjective responses were also very positive, but similarly alluded to the limitation of learning examination skills virtually. Conclusions  A medical school clinical elective can be successfully executed in a virtual format with an emphasis on student-directed learning. The novel "double-flipped" approach was highly rated by our small sample size. However, there remained a glaring limitation in the ability to transfer clinical skills in the virtual format. In the context of limited in-person contact due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe that the double-flipped, virtual format was a viable replacement for a traditional clinical rotation.

Abstract Image

医学生眼科学双翻转虚拟课堂模式:新型冠状病毒肺炎背景下的临床轮转方法
本研究旨在评估2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间医学生眼科虚拟双翻转临床轮转的效果。方法我们为8名有意从事眼科职业的医学生建立了一个虚拟的、逆向课堂的临床选修课。该课程包括要求的预习、基于案例的互动讨论和后续测验(第一次翻转),全部由学生作为教师(第二次翻转)准备和交付。课程结束后,我们对学生进行了五个方面的调查:(1)自主性和领导力,(2)自我效能,(3)对职业选择的影响,(4)教育体验的质量,(5)明确的目标和反馈,使用李克特量表1-5(5为最积极的)。我们还询问了关于整体体验的开放式问题,即优势,劣势以及对课程未来的建议。由于本研究的N较小且为探索性研究,故未进行正式的统计推断。结果7名学生参与调查。每个领域的综合平均调查分数在括号中表示。在“自主性和领导力”(4.5分)、“对职业选择的影响”(4.1分)、“教育体验质量”(5.0分)和“明确的目标和反馈”(4.4分)方面,受访者的回答都非常积极。“自我效能感”强调进行眼科检查的能力和眼科基础知识,平均得分较低(3.4)。主观反应也非常积极,但同样暗示了虚拟学习考试技巧的局限性。结论强调学生自主学习的虚拟教学模式可以成功实施医学院临床选修课。这种新颖的“双重翻转”方法在我们的小样本量中得到了很高的评价。然而,在以虚拟格式转移临床技能的能力方面仍然存在明显的限制。在新冠肺炎大流行限制面对面接触的背景下,我们认为,双重翻转、虚拟格式是传统临床轮转的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信