Pediatric Phantom Dosimetry Evaluation of a New Rectangular Collimator.

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN Pub Date : 2023-01-15
Amanda Martinez, Juan F Yepes, James E Jones, Phillip Wong, K Brandon Johnson, Sarah Canady, Qing Tang
{"title":"Pediatric Phantom Dosimetry Evaluation of a New Rectangular Collimator.","authors":"Amanda Martinez,&nbsp;Juan F Yepes,&nbsp;James E Jones,&nbsp;Phillip Wong,&nbsp;K Brandon Johnson,&nbsp;Sarah Canady,&nbsp;Qing Tang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare the effective dose (E) of the Tru-Image® rectangular collimator and the universal round collimator of a Planmeca® wall-mounted radiograph unit for two bitewing radiographs (right and left) on a pediatric phantom.<br/> <b>Methods:</b> Absorbed doses utilizing the Tru-Image ®rectangular collimator and universal round collimator were acquired using an anthropomorphic 10-year-old child phantom. Each set of 24 dosimeters was exposed to two bitewing exposures with the manufacturer's child settings. Fifty clinical exposures were completed for each set and three sets were exposed for each collimator. The average E per exposure was calculated.<br/> <b>Results:</b> The overall E for the Tru-Image ®rectangular collimator and the universal round collimator were 6.3 microsieverts (μSv) and 25.3 μSv, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> <0.001). The highest equivalent dose for both collimators was delivered to the oral mucosa. When compared to the universal round collimator, the Tru-Image ® rectangular collimator had significant dose reduction at all locations (<i>P</i> <0.05). When normalized and adjusted to the same source-to-end distance, there was an overall 65 percent dose reduction with the rectangular collimator.<br/> <b>Conclusion:</b> The average effective dose was significantly reduced with the use of the Tru-Image ®rectangular collimator. Clinical use of this rectangular collimator should be considered in the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51605,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","volume":"90 1","pages":"3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effective dose (E) of the Tru-Image® rectangular collimator and the universal round collimator of a Planmeca® wall-mounted radiograph unit for two bitewing radiographs (right and left) on a pediatric phantom.
Methods: Absorbed doses utilizing the Tru-Image ®rectangular collimator and universal round collimator were acquired using an anthropomorphic 10-year-old child phantom. Each set of 24 dosimeters was exposed to two bitewing exposures with the manufacturer's child settings. Fifty clinical exposures were completed for each set and three sets were exposed for each collimator. The average E per exposure was calculated.
Results: The overall E for the Tru-Image ®rectangular collimator and the universal round collimator were 6.3 microsieverts (μSv) and 25.3 μSv, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (P <0.001). The highest equivalent dose for both collimators was delivered to the oral mucosa. When compared to the universal round collimator, the Tru-Image ® rectangular collimator had significant dose reduction at all locations (P <0.05). When normalized and adjusted to the same source-to-end distance, there was an overall 65 percent dose reduction with the rectangular collimator.
Conclusion: The average effective dose was significantly reduced with the use of the Tru-Image ®rectangular collimator. Clinical use of this rectangular collimator should be considered in the pediatric population.

一种新型矩形准直器的儿童幻影剂量学评价。
目的:比较Planmeca®壁挂式x线摄影装置的trui - image®矩形准直器和通用圆形准直器在儿童幻影上的两个咬翼x线片(右和左)的有效剂量(E)。方法:使用Tru-Image®矩形准直器和通用圆形准直器,使用拟人的10岁儿童幻影获得吸收剂量。每组24个剂量计在制造商的儿童设置下进行两次咬伤照射。每组完成50次临床曝光,每个准直器曝光3组。计算每次暴露的平均E。结果:truimage®矩形准直器和万能圆准直器的总E值分别为6.3微西弗(μSv)和25.3微西弗(μSv)。结论:使用trui - image®矩形准直器可显著降低平均有效剂量。临床使用这种矩形准直器应考虑在儿科人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Acquired after the merger between the American Society of Dentistry for Children and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry in 2002, the Journal of Dentistry for Children (JDC) is an internationally renowned journal whose publishing dates back to 1934. Published three times a year, JDC promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. It covers a wide range of topics related to the clinical care of children, from clinical techniques of daily importance to the practitioner, to studies on child behavior and growth and development. JDC also provides information on the physical, psychological and emotional conditions of children as they relate to and affect their dental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信