Occupational Exposure during Intraperitoneal Pressurized Aerosol Chemotherapy Using Doxorubicin in a Pig Model

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wongeon Jung , Mijin Park , Soo Jin Park , Eun Ji Lee , Hee Seung Kim , Sun Ho Chung , Chungsik Yoon
{"title":"Occupational Exposure during Intraperitoneal Pressurized Aerosol Chemotherapy Using Doxorubicin in a Pig Model","authors":"Wongeon Jung ,&nbsp;Mijin Park ,&nbsp;Soo Jin Park ,&nbsp;Eun Ji Lee ,&nbsp;Hee Seung Kim ,&nbsp;Sun Ho Chung ,&nbsp;Chungsik Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.shaw.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study evaluated occupational exposure levels of doxorubicin in healthcare workers performing rotational intraperitoneal pressurized aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All samples were collected during PIPAC procedures applying doxorubicin to an experimental animal model (pigs). All procedures were applied to seven pigs, each for approximately 44 min. Surface samples (<em>n</em> = 51) were obtained from substances contaminating the PIPAC devices, surrounding objects, and protective equipment. Airborne samples were also collected around the operating table (<em>n</em> = 39). All samples were analyzed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the surface samples, doxorubicin was detected in only five samples (9.8%) that were directly exposed to antineoplastic drug aerosols in the abdominal cavity originating from PIPAC devices. The telescopes showed concentrations of 0.48–5.44 ng/cm<sup>2</sup> and the trocar showed 0.98 ng/cm<sup>2</sup> in the region where the spraying nozzles were inserted. The syringe line connector showed a maximum concentration of 181.07 ng/cm<sup>2</sup>, following a leakage. Contamination was not detected on the surgeons' gloves or shoes. Objects surrounding the operating table, including tables, operating lights, entrance doors, and trocar holders, were found to be uncontaminated. All air samples collected at locations where healthcare workers performed procedures were found to be uncontaminated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most air and surface samples were uncontaminated or showed very low doxorubicin concentrations during PIPAC procedures. However, there remains a potential for leakage, in which case dermal exposure may occur. Safety protocols related to leakage accidents, selection of appropriate protective equipment, and the use of disposable devices are necessary to prevent occupational exposure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56149,"journal":{"name":"Safety and Health at Work","volume":"14 2","pages":"Pages 237-242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/6c/main.PMC10300457.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety and Health at Work","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791123000252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study evaluated occupational exposure levels of doxorubicin in healthcare workers performing rotational intraperitoneal pressurized aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) procedures.

Methods

All samples were collected during PIPAC procedures applying doxorubicin to an experimental animal model (pigs). All procedures were applied to seven pigs, each for approximately 44 min. Surface samples (n = 51) were obtained from substances contaminating the PIPAC devices, surrounding objects, and protective equipment. Airborne samples were also collected around the operating table (n = 39). All samples were analyzed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Results

Among the surface samples, doxorubicin was detected in only five samples (9.8%) that were directly exposed to antineoplastic drug aerosols in the abdominal cavity originating from PIPAC devices. The telescopes showed concentrations of 0.48–5.44 ng/cm2 and the trocar showed 0.98 ng/cm2 in the region where the spraying nozzles were inserted. The syringe line connector showed a maximum concentration of 181.07 ng/cm2, following a leakage. Contamination was not detected on the surgeons' gloves or shoes. Objects surrounding the operating table, including tables, operating lights, entrance doors, and trocar holders, were found to be uncontaminated. All air samples collected at locations where healthcare workers performed procedures were found to be uncontaminated.

Conclusions

Most air and surface samples were uncontaminated or showed very low doxorubicin concentrations during PIPAC procedures. However, there remains a potential for leakage, in which case dermal exposure may occur. Safety protocols related to leakage accidents, selection of appropriate protective equipment, and the use of disposable devices are necessary to prevent occupational exposure.

Abstract Image

在猪模型中使用阿霉素进行腹腔加压气溶胶化疗期间的职业暴露
本研究评估了在进行旋转腹腔加压气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)程序的医护人员中阿霉素的职业暴露水平。方法所有样品均在PIPAC程序中采集,并应用阿霉素对实验动物模型(猪)进行处理。所有程序应用于7头猪,每头猪约44分钟。从污染PIPAC装置、周围物体和防护设备的物质中获得表面样本(n = 51)。在手术台上采集空气样本(n = 39)。所有样品均采用超高效液相色谱-质谱分析。结果直接暴露于PIPAC装置腹腔内抗肿瘤药物气溶胶的表面样品中,仅有5份(9.8%)样品检出阿霉素。望远镜显示,在喷嘴插入的区域,浓度为0.48 ~ 5.44 ng/cm2,套管针显示浓度为0.98 ng/cm2。注射器线接头显示泄漏后的最大浓度为181.07 ng/cm2。在外科医生的手套和鞋子上没有检测到污染。手术台周围的物体,包括手术台、手术灯、入口门和套管针支架,均未被污染。在卫生保健工作者执行程序的地点收集的所有空气样本均未受到污染。结论在PIPAC过程中,大多数空气和表面样品未被污染或显示出极低的阿霉素浓度。然而,仍有泄漏的可能,在这种情况下,皮肤暴露可能发生。与泄漏事故有关的安全规程、选择适当的防护设备和使用一次性装置是防止职业性接触的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety and Health at Work
Safety and Health at Work Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1080
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Safety and Health at Work (SH@W) is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal published quarterly in English beginning in 2010. The journal is aimed at providing grounds for the exchange of ideas and data developed through research experience in the broad field of occupational health and safety. Articles may deal with scientific research to improve workers'' health and safety by eliminating occupational accidents and diseases, pursuing a better working life, and creating a safe and comfortable working environment. The journal focuses primarily on original articles across the whole scope of occupational health and safety, but also welcomes up-to-date review papers and short communications and commentaries on urgent issues and case studies on unique epidemiological survey, methods of accident investigation, and analysis. High priority will be given to articles on occupational epidemiology, medicine, hygiene, toxicology, nursing and health services, work safety, ergonomics, work organization, engineering of safety (mechanical, electrical, chemical, and construction), safety management and policy, and studies related to economic evaluation and its social policy and organizational aspects. Its abbreviated title is Saf Health Work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信