Physicians' Clinical Behavior During Fluid Evaluation Encounters.

Muhammad K Hayat Syed, Kathryn Pendleton, John Park, Craig Weinert
{"title":"Physicians' Clinical Behavior During Fluid Evaluation Encounters.","authors":"Muhammad K Hayat Syed,&nbsp;Kathryn Pendleton,&nbsp;John Park,&nbsp;Craig Weinert","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We sought to identify factors affecting physicians' cognition and clinical behavior when evaluating patients that may need fluid therapy.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Proponents of dynamic fluid responsiveness testing advocate measuring cardiac output or stroke volume after a maneuver to prove that further fluids will increase cardiac output. However, surveys suggest that fluid therapy in clinical practice is often given without prior responsiveness testing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Thematic analysis of face-to-face structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ICUs and medical-surgical wards in acute care hospitals.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Intensivists and hospitalist physicians.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We conducted 43 interviews with experienced physicians in 19 hospitals. Hospitalized patients with hypotension, tachycardia, oliguria, or elevated serum lactate are commonly seen by physicians who weigh the risks and benefits of more fluid therapy. Encounters are often with unfamiliar patients and evaluation and decisions are completed quickly without involving other physicians. Dynamic testing for fluid responsiveness is used much less often than static methods and fluid boluses are often ordered with no testing at all. This approach is rationalized by factors that discourage dynamic testing: unavailability of equipment, time to obtain test results, or lack of expertise in obtaining valid data. Two mental calculations are particularly influential: physicians' estimate of the base rate of fluid responsiveness (determined by physical examination, chart review, and previous responses to fluid boluses) and physicians' perception of patient harm if 500 or 1,000 mL fluid boluses are ordered. When the perception of harm is low, physicians use heuristics that rationalize skipping dynamic testing.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Geographic limitation to hospitals in Minnesota, United States.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If dynamic responsiveness testing is to be used more often in routine clinical practice, physicians must be more convinced of the benefits of dynamic testing, that they can obtain valid results quickly and believe that even small fluid boluses harm their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0933"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/48/cc9-5-e0933.PMC10306425.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We sought to identify factors affecting physicians' cognition and clinical behavior when evaluating patients that may need fluid therapy.

Background: Proponents of dynamic fluid responsiveness testing advocate measuring cardiac output or stroke volume after a maneuver to prove that further fluids will increase cardiac output. However, surveys suggest that fluid therapy in clinical practice is often given without prior responsiveness testing.

Design: Thematic analysis of face-to-face structured interviews.

Setting: ICUs and medical-surgical wards in acute care hospitals.

Subjects: Intensivists and hospitalist physicians.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We conducted 43 interviews with experienced physicians in 19 hospitals. Hospitalized patients with hypotension, tachycardia, oliguria, or elevated serum lactate are commonly seen by physicians who weigh the risks and benefits of more fluid therapy. Encounters are often with unfamiliar patients and evaluation and decisions are completed quickly without involving other physicians. Dynamic testing for fluid responsiveness is used much less often than static methods and fluid boluses are often ordered with no testing at all. This approach is rationalized by factors that discourage dynamic testing: unavailability of equipment, time to obtain test results, or lack of expertise in obtaining valid data. Two mental calculations are particularly influential: physicians' estimate of the base rate of fluid responsiveness (determined by physical examination, chart review, and previous responses to fluid boluses) and physicians' perception of patient harm if 500 or 1,000 mL fluid boluses are ordered. When the perception of harm is low, physicians use heuristics that rationalize skipping dynamic testing.

Limitations: Geographic limitation to hospitals in Minnesota, United States.

Conclusions: If dynamic responsiveness testing is to be used more often in routine clinical practice, physicians must be more convinced of the benefits of dynamic testing, that they can obtain valid results quickly and believe that even small fluid boluses harm their patients.

医生在液体评估接触中的临床行为。
在评估可能需要液体疗法的患者时,我们试图确定影响医生认知和临床行为的因素。背景:动态液体反应性测试的支持者主张在手术后测量心输出量或搏量,以证明进一步的液体会增加心输出量。然而,调查显示,在临床实践中,液体疗法往往没有事先进行反应性测试。设计:面对面结构化访谈的专题分析。地点:急症医院的重症监护室和内科外科病房。研究对象:重症监护医师和住院医师。干预措施:没有。测量方法和主要结果:我们对19家医院的43名经验丰富的医生进行了访谈。有低血压、心动过速、少尿或血清乳酸升高的住院患者,医生通常会权衡更多液体治疗的风险和益处。经常遇到不熟悉的病人,评估和决定很快就完成了,没有其他医生的参与。与静态方法相比,流体响应性的动态测试使用频率要低得多,而且通常订购流体丸时根本不进行测试。这种方法被一些阻碍动态测试的因素合理化:设备不可用,获得测试结果的时间,或缺乏获得有效数据的专业知识。两种心理计算尤其有影响力:医生对液体反应基本率的估计(由体格检查、图表回顾和以前对液体丸的反应决定),以及医生对500或1000毫升液体丸的患者伤害的感知。当对危害的感知较低时,医生使用启发式方法使跳过动态测试合理化。局限性:仅针对美国明尼苏达州的医院。结论:如果要在常规临床实践中更频繁地使用动态反应性测试,医生必须更加确信动态测试的好处,他们可以快速获得有效的结果,并相信即使是小的液体丸也会对患者造成伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信