Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Use of Peer Physical Exam for Learning Fundoscopy.

Daniel Henick, Margarita Labkovich, Jake E Radell, Nitin Chopra, Nisha Chadha
{"title":"Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Use of Peer Physical Exam for Learning Fundoscopy.","authors":"Daniel Henick,&nbsp;Margarita Labkovich,&nbsp;Jake E Radell,&nbsp;Nitin Chopra,&nbsp;Nisha Chadha","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1743582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Peer physical examination learning is commonly practiced in medical schools during preclinical curricula and has been shown to improve empathy for patients. While there is literature regarding medical student attitudes toward peer physical exam learning, no studies to date have specifically examined student attitudes toward fundoscopy and dilation of the eyes for the purposes of learning fundoscopy. This study evaluates medical student preferences with regards to learning fundoscopy on peers and explores attitudes toward alternate approaches. <b>Methods</b>  First year medical students at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai participated in a 2-hour fundoscopy skills workshop in March 2020. Following the session, the authors administered a voluntary survey querying students on attitudes toward peer physical exam learning and its use in learning peer fundoscopy. Primary study endpoints evaluated (1) student attitudes toward the use of peer physical exam learning, (2) learning benefit of the session, including student comfort with conducting the fundoscopy exam, and (3) empathy toward patients experiencing dilation. Secondary endpoints focused on alternative teaching methods and preferences for nonmydriatic fundoscopy. Analysis of survey data was performed using nonparametric Spearman's correlations, chi-square tests, <i>t</i> -tests, and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests. <b>Results</b>  A total of 51/138 (37%) students completed the survey, with 78% indicating they felt peer physical exam learning was a helpful instructional method, including for the fundoscopic exam. The session led to improved self-rated fundoscopy skills and empathy for patients. However, when considering learning with dilation versus alternative nonmydriatic techniques, 96% of students indicated a preference for using alternative nonmydriatic techniques. <b>Conclusion</b>  This study found that students' attitudes toward fundoscopy generally aligned with their overall peer physical exam preferences. However, they preferred not using dilation and learning with nonmydriatic fundoscopic techniques. Assessing student learning preferences and incorporating novel instructional tools can help facilitate more successful fundoscopy skills acquisition. These considerations are particularly important in the context of COVID-19 and with advances in teleophthalmology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 1","pages":"e60-e69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/b2/10-1055-s-0042-1743582.PMC9928080.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Peer physical examination learning is commonly practiced in medical schools during preclinical curricula and has been shown to improve empathy for patients. While there is literature regarding medical student attitudes toward peer physical exam learning, no studies to date have specifically examined student attitudes toward fundoscopy and dilation of the eyes for the purposes of learning fundoscopy. This study evaluates medical student preferences with regards to learning fundoscopy on peers and explores attitudes toward alternate approaches. Methods  First year medical students at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai participated in a 2-hour fundoscopy skills workshop in March 2020. Following the session, the authors administered a voluntary survey querying students on attitudes toward peer physical exam learning and its use in learning peer fundoscopy. Primary study endpoints evaluated (1) student attitudes toward the use of peer physical exam learning, (2) learning benefit of the session, including student comfort with conducting the fundoscopy exam, and (3) empathy toward patients experiencing dilation. Secondary endpoints focused on alternative teaching methods and preferences for nonmydriatic fundoscopy. Analysis of survey data was performed using nonparametric Spearman's correlations, chi-square tests, t -tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results  A total of 51/138 (37%) students completed the survey, with 78% indicating they felt peer physical exam learning was a helpful instructional method, including for the fundoscopic exam. The session led to improved self-rated fundoscopy skills and empathy for patients. However, when considering learning with dilation versus alternative nonmydriatic techniques, 96% of students indicated a preference for using alternative nonmydriatic techniques. Conclusion  This study found that students' attitudes toward fundoscopy generally aligned with their overall peer physical exam preferences. However, they preferred not using dilation and learning with nonmydriatic fundoscopic techniques. Assessing student learning preferences and incorporating novel instructional tools can help facilitate more successful fundoscopy skills acquisition. These considerations are particularly important in the context of COVID-19 and with advances in teleophthalmology.

医学生对使用同伴体格检查学习眼底镜检查的态度。
在医学院校的临床前课程中,同伴体格检查学习是一种常见的做法,并已被证明可以提高对患者的同理心。虽然有文献关于医学生对同伴体检学习的态度,但迄今为止还没有研究专门调查学生对眼底镜检查和为学习眼底镜检查而进行的眼睛扩张的态度。本研究评估医学生在同伴身上学习眼底镜的偏好,并探讨他们对其他方法的态度。方法2020年3月,西奈山伊坎医学院一年级医学生参加了为期2小时的眼底镜检查技能讲习班。会议结束后,作者进行了一项自愿调查,询问学生对同伴体格检查学习的态度及其在同伴眼底镜检查学习中的应用。主要研究终点评估了(1)学生对使用同伴体检学习的态度,(2)该课程的学习效益,包括学生对进行眼底镜检查的舒适度,以及(3)对正在经历扩张的患者的同理心。次要终点集中于替代教学方法和对非骨髓性眼底镜检查的偏好。使用非参数Spearman相关、卡方检验、t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验对调查数据进行分析。结果138名学生中有51人(37%)完成了调查,其中78%的学生认为同伴体检学习是一种有益的教学方法,包括对眼底镜检查。该课程提高了他们的眼底镜检查技能和对病人的同理心。然而,当考虑扩张式学习与非扩张式学习时,96%的学生表示更倾向于使用非扩张式学习。结论本研究发现学生对眼底镜检查的态度与他们对同伴体检的总体偏好基本一致。然而,他们更倾向于不使用扩张术和使用无椎体眼底镜技术。评估学生的学习偏好和采用新颖的教学工具可以帮助更成功地获得眼底镜检查技能。在COVID-19疫情背景下,随着远距眼科技术的进步,这些考虑尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信