Three-year Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marleen Peumans, Stefanie Vandormael, Iris De Coster, Jan De Munck, Bart Van Meerbeek
{"title":"Three-year Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions.","authors":"Marleen Peumans, Stefanie Vandormael, Iris De Coster, Jan De Munck, Bart Van Meerbeek","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b4186751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the 3-year clinical performance of a universal adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CUBQ); Kuraray Noritake) when restoring non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two different application modes (etch-and-rinse vs self-etch with prior selective enamel etching).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-one patients participated in this study. A total of 251 NCCLs (n = 251) were assigned to two groups: 1) CUBQ applied in etch-and-rinse mode (n = 122; CUBQ-ER) and 2) CUBQ applied in self-etch mode with prior selective etching of enamel with phosphoric acid (n = 129; CUPQ-SEE). The same resin composite, Clearfil Majesty ES-2 (Kuraray Noritake), was used for all restorations. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 1 and 3 years using FDI criteria: marginal staining, fracture and retention, marginal adaptation, post-operative sensitivity and recurrence of caries. Statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations (2-way GEE model).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient recall rate at 3 years was 90%. After 3 years, both groups presented an increase in the percentage of small but still clinically acceptable marginal defects (CUBQ-ER: 67%, CUBQ-SEE: 63.2%) and marginal staining (CUBQ-ER: 32.6%, CUBQ-SEE: 31.7%). The overall success rate was 82.6% and 83.8% for CUBQ-ER and CUBQ-SEE, respectively. In total, 38 restorations (19 CUBQ-ER, 19 CUBQ-SEE) failed because of loss of retention, fracture, severe marginal defect and/or marginal discoloration. A retention rate of 87.2% and 86.3% was recorded for CUBQ-ER and CUBQ-SEE, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two bonding-mode groups for any of the evaluated parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After 3 years of clinical service, Clearfil Universal Bond Quick performed similarly in etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes with prior selective enamel etching.</p>","PeriodicalId":55604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b4186751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the 3-year clinical performance of a universal adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CUBQ); Kuraray Noritake) when restoring non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two different application modes (etch-and-rinse vs self-etch with prior selective enamel etching).

Materials and methods: Fifty-one patients participated in this study. A total of 251 NCCLs (n = 251) were assigned to two groups: 1) CUBQ applied in etch-and-rinse mode (n = 122; CUBQ-ER) and 2) CUBQ applied in self-etch mode with prior selective etching of enamel with phosphoric acid (n = 129; CUPQ-SEE). The same resin composite, Clearfil Majesty ES-2 (Kuraray Noritake), was used for all restorations. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 1 and 3 years using FDI criteria: marginal staining, fracture and retention, marginal adaptation, post-operative sensitivity and recurrence of caries. Statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations (2-way GEE model).

Results: The patient recall rate at 3 years was 90%. After 3 years, both groups presented an increase in the percentage of small but still clinically acceptable marginal defects (CUBQ-ER: 67%, CUBQ-SEE: 63.2%) and marginal staining (CUBQ-ER: 32.6%, CUBQ-SEE: 31.7%). The overall success rate was 82.6% and 83.8% for CUBQ-ER and CUBQ-SEE, respectively. In total, 38 restorations (19 CUBQ-ER, 19 CUBQ-SEE) failed because of loss of retention, fracture, severe marginal defect and/or marginal discoloration. A retention rate of 87.2% and 86.3% was recorded for CUBQ-ER and CUBQ-SEE, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two bonding-mode groups for any of the evaluated parameters.

Conclusion: After 3 years of clinical service, Clearfil Universal Bond Quick performed similarly in etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes with prior selective enamel etching.

通用粘合剂在非龋齿性宫颈病变中的三年临床表现。
目的:这项随机对照临床试验的目的是评估一种通用粘接剂(Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CUBQ);Kuraray Noritake)在修复非龋性牙颈部病变(NCCL)时,使用两种不同的应用模式(蚀刻-冲洗 vs 自酸蚀,事先进行选择性釉质蚀刻)的 3 年临床表现:51名患者参与了这项研究。共有 251 个 NCCL(n = 251)被分配到两组:1)以蚀刻-冲洗模式使用 CUBQ(n = 122;CUBQ-ER);2)以自酸洗模式使用 CUBQ,并事先用磷酸选择性蚀刻牙釉质(n = 129;CUPQ-SEE)。所有修复体均使用相同的树脂复合材料 Clearfil Majesty ES-2(Kuraray Noritake)。修复体在基线、1 年和 3 年时使用 FDI 标准进行评估:边缘染色、断裂和固位、边缘适应性、术后敏感性和龋病复发。统计分析采用了带广义估计方程的逻辑回归模型(双向 GEE 模型):结果:3 年后患者的召回率为 90%。3 年后,两组患者小的但临床上仍可接受的边缘缺损比例(CUBQ-ER:67%,CUBQ-SEE:63.2%)和边缘染色比例(CUBQ-ER:32.6%,CUBQ-SEE:31.7%)均有所上升。CUBQ-ER 和 CUBQ-SEE 的总体成功率分别为 82.6% 和 83.8%。共有 38 个修复体(19 个 CUBQ-ER,19 个 CUBQ-SEE)因固位丧失、断裂、严重边缘缺损和/或边缘变色而失败。CUBQ-ER和CUBQ-SEE的固位率分别为87.2%和86.3%。两组粘结模式在任何评估参数上都没有明显差异:经过3年的临床应用,Clearfil通用粘接快速粘接剂在蚀刻-冲洗模式和自酸蚀模式下的表现相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: New materials and applications for adhesion are profoundly changing the way dentistry is delivered. Bonding techniques, which have long been restricted to the tooth hard tissues, enamel, and dentin, have obvious applications in operative and preventive dentistry, as well as in esthetic and pediatric dentistry, prosthodontics, and orthodontics. The current development of adhesive techniques for soft tissues and slow-releasing agents will expand applications to include periodontics and oral surgery. Scientifically sound, peer-reviewed articles explore the latest innovations in these emerging fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信