Salient stakeholders: Using the salience stakeholder model to assess stakeholders’ influence in healthcare priority setting

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lydia Kapiriri, Shaghayegh Donya Razavi
{"title":"Salient stakeholders: Using the salience stakeholder model to assess stakeholders’ influence in healthcare priority setting","authors":"Lydia Kapiriri,&nbsp;Shaghayegh Donya Razavi","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stakeholders play an important role in health priority setting, and their roles have been discussed in the literature, mainly in relationship to their power. An emerging body of literature is focusing on the legitimacy of the stakeholders. Using the case of the Uganda health system, the overall aim of this paper is to assess the utility of the salience stakeholder analysis framework in identifying the most salient stakeholders in health-care priority setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a qualitative case study involving 57 key informant interviews with national and district level policy makers and a review of policy documents. Interview data were analyzed using QSR NVivo10 qualitative data analysis software. Analysis was guided by the salience stakeholder analysis framework.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Among the eight groups of stakeholders identified by the respondents, the politicians were found to be the most salient stakeholders. However, stakeholders’ salience varied depending on the type of decision, the nature of health issue and how and who tabled the health issue.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The salience stakeholder analysis framework, originating from the business management and political science disciplines, provided a more comprehensive stakeholder analysis by supporting the concurrent consideration of power, legitimacy and urgency in stakeholder analysis for health care priority setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100048","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229621000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Stakeholders play an important role in health priority setting, and their roles have been discussed in the literature, mainly in relationship to their power. An emerging body of literature is focusing on the legitimacy of the stakeholders. Using the case of the Uganda health system, the overall aim of this paper is to assess the utility of the salience stakeholder analysis framework in identifying the most salient stakeholders in health-care priority setting.

Methods

This was a qualitative case study involving 57 key informant interviews with national and district level policy makers and a review of policy documents. Interview data were analyzed using QSR NVivo10 qualitative data analysis software. Analysis was guided by the salience stakeholder analysis framework.

Findings

Among the eight groups of stakeholders identified by the respondents, the politicians were found to be the most salient stakeholders. However, stakeholders’ salience varied depending on the type of decision, the nature of health issue and how and who tabled the health issue.

Conclusion

The salience stakeholder analysis framework, originating from the business management and political science disciplines, provided a more comprehensive stakeholder analysis by supporting the concurrent consideration of power, legitimacy and urgency in stakeholder analysis for health care priority setting.

突出利益相关者:使用突出利益相关者模型来评估利益相关者在医疗保健优先事项设置中的影响
利益相关者在卫生重点确定中发挥重要作用,文献中讨论了他们的作用,主要是与其权力的关系。一个新兴的文献体系正在关注利益相关者的合法性。以乌干达卫生系统为例,本文的总体目标是评估突出利益相关者分析框架在确定卫生保健优先设置中最突出的利益相关者方面的效用。方法采用定性案例研究方法,对国家和地区一级的政策制定者进行了57次关键信息提供者访谈,并对政策文件进行了审查。访谈资料采用QSR NVivo10定性数据分析软件进行分析。分析以显著利益相关者分析框架为指导。调查结果在受访者确定的八组利益相关者中,政治家被认为是最突出的利益相关者。然而,利益攸关方的突出程度因决策类型、健康问题的性质以及如何和由谁提出健康问题而异。结论突出性利益相关者分析框架起源于商业管理和政治学学科,支持在卫生保健优先事项设置的利益相关者分析中同时考虑权力、合法性和紧迫性,从而提供了更全面的利益相关者分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信