Biomechanical analysis of tibial plateau posterolateral fracture fragment fixation and introduction of a lateral tibia plateau hook plate system

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Chien-Shun Wang , Hsuan-Wen Wang , Kun-Chun Chen , Chun-Li Lin
{"title":"Biomechanical analysis of tibial plateau posterolateral fracture fragment fixation and introduction of a lateral tibia plateau hook plate system","authors":"Chien-Shun Wang ,&nbsp;Hsuan-Wen Wang ,&nbsp;Kun-Chun Chen ,&nbsp;Chun-Li Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fixing the posterolateral fragments of tibial plateau fractures<span> has been challenging owing to potential neurovascular injuries and fibular head blocks. Several surgical approaches and fixation techniques have been reported, with distinct limitations. We propose a novel lateral tibia plateau hook plate system and compare its biomechanical stability with other fixation methods.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-four synthetic tibia models were simulated to present posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. These models were randomly assigned to three groups. Group A models were fixed with the lateral tibia plateau hook plate system, Group B with variable-angle anterolateral locking compression plates, and Group C with direct posterior buttress plates. The models’ biomechanical stability was evaluated using static (gradually increased axial compressive loads) and fatigue (cyclically loaded from 100 to 600 N for 2000 cycles each) tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Groups A and C models exhibited comparable axial stiffness, subsidence load, failure load, and displacement in the static test. Group A model exhibited higher subsidence and failure loads than Group B model. Groups A and C models exhibited comparable displacement at 100 N cyclic loading in the fatigue test. Group C model was more stable at higher loads. Group C model endured the highest subsidence cycle numbers, followed by Groups A and B models.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lateral tibia plateau hook plate system provided similar static biomechanical stability as the direct posterior buttress plates and comparable dynamic stability under limited axial loading. This system is a potential posterolateral treatment choice owing to its convenience and safety, in treating tibia plateau fractures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265823001811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fixing the posterolateral fragments of tibial plateau fractures has been challenging owing to potential neurovascular injuries and fibular head blocks. Several surgical approaches and fixation techniques have been reported, with distinct limitations. We propose a novel lateral tibia plateau hook plate system and compare its biomechanical stability with other fixation methods.

Methods

Twenty-four synthetic tibia models were simulated to present posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. These models were randomly assigned to three groups. Group A models were fixed with the lateral tibia plateau hook plate system, Group B with variable-angle anterolateral locking compression plates, and Group C with direct posterior buttress plates. The models’ biomechanical stability was evaluated using static (gradually increased axial compressive loads) and fatigue (cyclically loaded from 100 to 600 N for 2000 cycles each) tests.

Results

Groups A and C models exhibited comparable axial stiffness, subsidence load, failure load, and displacement in the static test. Group A model exhibited higher subsidence and failure loads than Group B model. Groups A and C models exhibited comparable displacement at 100 N cyclic loading in the fatigue test. Group C model was more stable at higher loads. Group C model endured the highest subsidence cycle numbers, followed by Groups A and B models.

Conclusions

The lateral tibia plateau hook plate system provided similar static biomechanical stability as the direct posterior buttress plates and comparable dynamic stability under limited axial loading. This system is a potential posterolateral treatment choice owing to its convenience and safety, in treating tibia plateau fractures.

胫骨平台后外侧骨折碎片固定的生物力学分析和胫骨平台外侧钩板系统的引入。
背景:由于潜在的神经血管损伤和腓骨头阻滞,固定胫骨平台骨折的后外侧碎片一直是一项挑战。已报道的几种手术方法和固定技术都有明显的局限性。我们提出了一种新型的胫骨外侧平台钩板系统,并将其生物力学稳定性与其他固定方法进行了比较:方法:模拟二十四个合成胫骨模型,展示胫骨后外侧平台骨折。这些模型被随机分配到三组。A组模型使用胫骨外侧平台钩钢板系统固定,B组使用可变角度前外侧锁定加压钢板,C组使用直接后托钢板。模型的生物力学稳定性通过静态(逐渐增加轴向压缩载荷)和疲劳(周期性载荷从 100 牛顿到 600 牛顿,每个周期 2000 次)测试进行评估:结果:在静态测试中,A 组和 C 组模型的轴向刚度、下沉载荷、破坏载荷和位移相当。A 组模型的下沉荷载和破坏荷载高于 B 组模型。在疲劳试验中,A 组和 C 组模型在 100 N 循环载荷下的位移量相当。C 组模型在更高载荷下更加稳定。C 组模型承受的下沉循环次数最多,其次是 A 组和 B 组模型:结论:胫骨外侧平台钩板系统与直接后托板具有相似的静态生物力学稳定性,在有限的轴向负荷下具有相似的动态稳定性。在治疗胫骨平台骨折时,该系统因其方便性和安全性而成为一种潜在的后外侧治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信