Comparison of Low- and High-temperature Cagewash Cycles for Sanitation of Rodent Housing Equipment in Research Facilities.

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Jiajie Jessica Xu, Phaedra B Hutchison, Nicole L Herndon, Sarah O Allison, Lyndon J Goodly
{"title":"Comparison of Low- and High-temperature Cagewash Cycles for Sanitation of Rodent Housing Equipment in Research Facilities.","authors":"Jiajie Jessica Xu,&nbsp;Phaedra B Hutchison,&nbsp;Nicole L Herndon,&nbsp;Sarah O Allison,&nbsp;Lyndon J Goodly","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sanitation guidelines for animal research facilities state that disinfection is achieved by application of high-temperature water (143 to 180 °F [62 to 82 °C]) or detergents and disinfectants. However, these guidelines are based on requirements for pasteurization, which may be unnecessarily stringent for the sanitation of nonfood items and do not address the theoretical sanitation potential of water at temperatures below 143 °F (62 °C). Recent literature indicates that water temperatures below 143 °F (62 °C) can also provide effective sanitation. In this study, we compared cagewash cycles at low (100 °F [38 °C] and 120 °F [49 °C]) and high (standard) (180 °F [82 °C]) temperatures and evaluated sanitation efficacy by using ATP swabs and RODAC plates. Low-temperature loads were washed either with or without prior treatment of a chemical disinfectant (10% bleach). The 100 °F (38 °C) cycle was not sufficient for sanitization without bleach pretreatment. However, the 120 °F (49 °C) cycle effectively sanitized cages without bleach pretreatment. Validation of effective sanitation at a lower water temperature (120 °F [49 °C]) can improve cagewash logistics and reduce costs as compared with standard (180 °F [82 °C]) high-temperature cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936851/pdf/jaalas2023000048.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sanitation guidelines for animal research facilities state that disinfection is achieved by application of high-temperature water (143 to 180 °F [62 to 82 °C]) or detergents and disinfectants. However, these guidelines are based on requirements for pasteurization, which may be unnecessarily stringent for the sanitation of nonfood items and do not address the theoretical sanitation potential of water at temperatures below 143 °F (62 °C). Recent literature indicates that water temperatures below 143 °F (62 °C) can also provide effective sanitation. In this study, we compared cagewash cycles at low (100 °F [38 °C] and 120 °F [49 °C]) and high (standard) (180 °F [82 °C]) temperatures and evaluated sanitation efficacy by using ATP swabs and RODAC plates. Low-temperature loads were washed either with or without prior treatment of a chemical disinfectant (10% bleach). The 100 °F (38 °C) cycle was not sufficient for sanitization without bleach pretreatment. However, the 120 °F (49 °C) cycle effectively sanitized cages without bleach pretreatment. Validation of effective sanitation at a lower water temperature (120 °F [49 °C]) can improve cagewash logistics and reduce costs as compared with standard (180 °F [82 °C]) high-temperature cycles.

研究设施啮齿动物饲养设备低温和高温洗笼周期的比较。
动物研究设施的卫生指南指出,消毒是通过使用高温水(143至180°F[62至82°C])或洗涤剂和消毒剂来实现的。然而,这些指导方针是基于巴氏灭菌的要求,对于非食品项目的卫生可能不必要地严格,并且没有解决温度低于143°F(62°C)的水的理论卫生潜力。最近的文献表明,水温低于143°F(62°C)也可以提供有效的卫生。在这项研究中,我们比较了低(100°F[38°C]和120°F[49°C])和高(标准)(180°F[82°C])温度下的笼洗循环,并通过ATP拭子和RODAC板评估了卫生效果。低温负荷在事先使用或不使用化学消毒剂(10%漂白剂)处理的情况下洗涤。如果没有漂白剂预处理,100°F(38°C)循环不足以消毒。然而,120°F(49°C)循环有效消毒笼子没有漂白剂预处理。与标准高温循环(180°F[82°C])相比,验证在较低水温(120°F[49°C])下的有效卫生可以改善笼洗物流并降低成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
35.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS) serves as an official communication vehicle for the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS). The journal includes a section of refereed articles and a section of AALAS association news. All signed articles, including refereed articles and book reviews, editorials, committee reports, and news and commentary, reflect the individual views of the authors and are not official views of AALAS. The mission of the refereed section of the journal is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information on animal biology, technology, facility operations, management, and compliance as relevant to the AALAS membership. JAALAS accepts research reports (data-based) or scholarly reports (literature-based), with the caveat that all articles, including solicited manuscripts, must include appropriate references and must undergo peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信