Barriers and facilitators of Patient-Public Engagement for health system improvement in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic scoping review

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Samuel Egyakwa Ankomah , Adam Fusheini , Sarah Derrett
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators of Patient-Public Engagement for health system improvement in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic scoping review","authors":"Samuel Egyakwa Ankomah ,&nbsp;Adam Fusheini ,&nbsp;Sarah Derrett","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patient-Public Engagement (PPE) is central to most community and public health interventions. There are reports on PPE’s impact on improving health and health systems. Yet, PPE initiatives are infrequent in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). A key step to enhancing engagement is identifying facilitators and barriers of PPE. Evidence synthesis of PPE’s effect on improving health systems is lacking. This study seeks to address this knowledge gap.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This review (Protocol published) followed Arksey and O’Malley’s guidelines for conducting and reporting scoping reviews. A systematic search of peer-reviewed English language literature published between January 1999 and December 2019 on Scopus, Medline (Ovid), CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted. A thematic framework synthesis was employed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen articles from ten Sub-Saharan African countries met the inclusion criteria of studies focusing on patient, public, citizen or community consultation/engagement/involvement in health services in Sub-Saharan Africa; as well as on barriers and facilitators for health systems improvement. The identified barriers and facilitators for health systems improvement were categorised onto a framework comprising individual-level, community-level and macro/strategic-level factors. Previous reviews on PPE have not focused on barriers and facilitators and its effect on improving health delivery in SSA, yet important for any successful PPE implementation. Barriers and facilitators of PPE largely differ from one health system level to another.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Policymakers need to consider the individual and community level contextual factors that influence PPE for effective implementation. Adopting context-specific approaches at all health system levels rather than a one-size-fit-all approach is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297765/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229621000265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

Patient-Public Engagement (PPE) is central to most community and public health interventions. There are reports on PPE’s impact on improving health and health systems. Yet, PPE initiatives are infrequent in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). A key step to enhancing engagement is identifying facilitators and barriers of PPE. Evidence synthesis of PPE’s effect on improving health systems is lacking. This study seeks to address this knowledge gap.

Methods

This review (Protocol published) followed Arksey and O’Malley’s guidelines for conducting and reporting scoping reviews. A systematic search of peer-reviewed English language literature published between January 1999 and December 2019 on Scopus, Medline (Ovid), CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted. A thematic framework synthesis was employed.

Results

Eighteen articles from ten Sub-Saharan African countries met the inclusion criteria of studies focusing on patient, public, citizen or community consultation/engagement/involvement in health services in Sub-Saharan Africa; as well as on barriers and facilitators for health systems improvement. The identified barriers and facilitators for health systems improvement were categorised onto a framework comprising individual-level, community-level and macro/strategic-level factors. Previous reviews on PPE have not focused on barriers and facilitators and its effect on improving health delivery in SSA, yet important for any successful PPE implementation. Barriers and facilitators of PPE largely differ from one health system level to another.

Conclusion

Policymakers need to consider the individual and community level contextual factors that influence PPE for effective implementation. Adopting context-specific approaches at all health system levels rather than a one-size-fit-all approach is recommended.

Abstract Image

撒哈拉以南非洲改善卫生系统的患者-公众参与的障碍和促进因素:系统范围审查
患者-公众参与(PPE)是大多数社区和公共卫生干预措施的核心。有关于个人防护装备对改善卫生和卫生系统影响的报告。然而,个人防护装备倡议在撒哈拉以南非洲地区并不常见。加强参与的一个关键步骤是确定个人防护装备的促进因素和障碍。缺乏个人防护装备对改善卫生系统影响的综合证据。本研究旨在解决这一知识差距。方法本综述遵循Arksey和O 'Malley的指导方针进行和报告范围评价。系统检索1999年1月至2019年12月在Scopus、Medline (Ovid)、CINAHL和Embase数据库上发表的同行评审的英文文献。采用了专题框架综合。结果来自10个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的18篇文章符合以撒哈拉以南非洲患者、公众、公民或社区咨询/参与/参与卫生服务为重点的研究的纳入标准;以及卫生系统改善的障碍和促进因素。已确定的卫生系统改善障碍和促进因素被分类到一个框架中,该框架包括个人层面、社区层面和宏观/战略层面的因素。以往对个人防护装备的审查并未侧重于障碍和促进因素及其对改善SSA卫生服务的影响,但这对于成功实施个人防护装备很重要。个人防护装备的障碍和促进因素在很大程度上因卫生系统级别而异。结论决策者需要考虑个人和社区层面的环境因素,影响个人防护装备的有效实施。建议在所有卫生系统级别采用因地制宜的方法,而不是一刀切的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信