Influence of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors on Predictive Value of a Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Test.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001884
Kaden R Narayani, Raj I Narayani
{"title":"Influence of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors on Predictive Value of a Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Test.","authors":"Kaden R Narayani, Raj I Narayani","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000001884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>We analyzed if the predictive value of multitarget stool-based DNA (mt-sDNA) varied when patients had pre-existing known colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>mt-sDNA test is approved for CRC screening in average-risk patients. Whether patients with a personal history of adenomatous colon polyps or a family history of CRC (CRC risk factors) benefit from mt-sDNA testing is unknown.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>We reviewed charts for all positive mt-sDNA referrals between 2017 and 2021. Diagnostic colonoscopy adherence rates were calculated. In those who had colonoscopy, we compared detection rates for any colorectal neoplasia (CRN), multiple (3 or more) adenomas, sessile serrated polyps (SSP), advanced CRN, and CRC between patients with and without known CRC risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1297 referrals for positive mt-sDNA, 1176 (91%) completed a diagnostic colonoscopy. The absence of neoplasia was noted in 27% of colonoscopy exams. When neoplasia was identified, findings were as follows: any CRN (73%), multiple adenomas (34%), SSP (23%), advanced CRN (33%), and CRC (2.5%). One or more CRC risk factors were present in 229 (19%) of cases. In the CRC risk factor subgroup, patients having a prior history of adenomatous polyps or a family history of CRC were no more likely to have any CRN, multiple adenomas, SSP, advanced CRN, or CRC compared to average-risk patients when mt-sDNA was positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world analysis of positive mt-sDNA referrals, adherence to subsequent diagnostic colonoscopy recommendations was high. The presence of pre-existing CRC risk factors did not affect the positive predictive value of mt-sDNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goals: We analyzed if the predictive value of multitarget stool-based DNA (mt-sDNA) varied when patients had pre-existing known colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors.

Background: mt-sDNA test is approved for CRC screening in average-risk patients. Whether patients with a personal history of adenomatous colon polyps or a family history of CRC (CRC risk factors) benefit from mt-sDNA testing is unknown.

Study: We reviewed charts for all positive mt-sDNA referrals between 2017 and 2021. Diagnostic colonoscopy adherence rates were calculated. In those who had colonoscopy, we compared detection rates for any colorectal neoplasia (CRN), multiple (3 or more) adenomas, sessile serrated polyps (SSP), advanced CRN, and CRC between patients with and without known CRC risk factors.

Results: Of 1297 referrals for positive mt-sDNA, 1176 (91%) completed a diagnostic colonoscopy. The absence of neoplasia was noted in 27% of colonoscopy exams. When neoplasia was identified, findings were as follows: any CRN (73%), multiple adenomas (34%), SSP (23%), advanced CRN (33%), and CRC (2.5%). One or more CRC risk factors were present in 229 (19%) of cases. In the CRC risk factor subgroup, patients having a prior history of adenomatous polyps or a family history of CRC were no more likely to have any CRN, multiple adenomas, SSP, advanced CRN, or CRC compared to average-risk patients when mt-sDNA was positive.

Conclusions: In this real-world analysis of positive mt-sDNA referrals, adherence to subsequent diagnostic colonoscopy recommendations was high. The presence of pre-existing CRC risk factors did not affect the positive predictive value of mt-sDNA.

结直肠癌风险因素对多目标粪便 DNA 检测阳性预测值的影响
目标:背景:mt-sDNA 检测已被批准用于普通风险患者的 CRC 筛查。有腺瘤性结肠息肉个人史或 CRC 家族史(CRC 危险因素)的患者是否能从 mt-sDNA 检测中获益尚不清楚:我们查阅了2017年至2021年间所有mt-sDNA阳性转诊病历。我们计算了诊断性结肠镜检查的坚持率。在接受结肠镜检查的患者中,我们比较了有和无已知 CRC 危险因素患者的任何结直肠肿瘤 (CRN)、多发性(3 个或以上)腺瘤、无柄锯齿状息肉 (SSP)、晚期 CRN 和 CRC 的检出率:在 1297 例 mt-sDNA 阳性的转诊患者中,有 1176 例(91%)完成了诊断性结肠镜检查。27%的结肠镜检查未发现肿瘤。当发现肿瘤时,检查结果如下:任何 CRN(73%)、多发性腺瘤(34%)、SSP(23%)、晚期 CRN(33%)和 CRC(2.5%)。229例病例(19%)存在一种或多种 CRC 风险因素。在 CRC 风险因素亚组中,与 mt-sDNA 阳性的普通风险患者相比,既往有腺瘤性息肉病史或 CRC 家族史的患者发生 CRN、多发性腺瘤、SSP、晚期 CRN 或 CRC 的几率并不高:在这项对 mt-sDNA 阳性转诊患者的实际分析中,对后续结肠镜诊断建议的依从性很高。已有的 CRC 危险因素并不影响 mt-sDNA 的阳性预测值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信