Does YouTube offer high-quality ınformation? Evaluation of patient experience videos after orthognathic surgery.

IF 3 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Angle Orthodontist Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.2319/042522-315.1

Elif Albayrak, Muhammed Hilmi Büyükçavuş

{"title":"Does YouTube offer high-quality ınformation? Evaluation of patient experience videos after orthognathic surgery.","authors":"Elif Albayrak, Muhammed Hilmi Büyükçavuş","doi":"10.2319/042522-315.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the content, reliability, and quality of videos of patient experiences after orthognathic surgery on YouTube.Materials and methods: Fifty videos that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The demographic characteristics of the videos were determined, and 13 points were used to classify poor and rich-content videos. The quality of the videos was evaluated using the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), Global Quality Score (GQS), and DISCERN. The Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman correlation, and linear regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.Results: When poor- and rich-content videos were evaluated, there were statistically significant differences in video duration, number of likes, number of comments, and interaction index (P < .05). Compared to the poor-content video group, the GQS score, DISCERN, total content, and VIQI score of the rich-content video group were significantly higher. The interaction index and video duration and video information content quality showed a positive relationship.Conclusions: Although the quality of the videos shared by patients on YouTube was generally moderate, the content of the information was generally poor. Nevertheless, it should be considered that YouTube videos can be a source of information for patients who want to have surgery, which can affect the process.","PeriodicalId":50790,"journal":{"name":"Angle Orthodontist","volume":"93 4","pages":"409-416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294570/pdf/i1945-7103-93-4-409.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/042522-315.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the content, reliability, and quality of videos of patient experiences after orthognathic surgery on YouTube.

Materials and methods: Fifty videos that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The demographic characteristics of the videos were determined, and 13 points were used to classify poor and rich-content videos. The quality of the videos was evaluated using the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), Global Quality Score (GQS), and DISCERN. The Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman correlation, and linear regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.

Results: When poor- and rich-content videos were evaluated, there were statistically significant differences in video duration, number of likes, number of comments, and interaction index (P < .05). Compared to the poor-content video group, the GQS score, DISCERN, total content, and VIQI score of the rich-content video group were significantly higher. The interaction index and video duration and video information content quality showed a positive relationship.

Conclusions: Although the quality of the videos shared by patients on YouTube was generally moderate, the content of the information was generally poor. Nevertheless, it should be considered that YouTube videos can be a source of information for patients who want to have surgery, which can affect the process.

查看原文本刊更多论文

YouTube提供高质量的ınformation吗?正颌手术后患者体验录像的评价。

目的:评价YouTube上关于正颌手术后患者体验视频的内容、可靠性和质量。材料与方法:对50部符合纳入标准的视频进行分析。确定视频的人口统计学特征，用13分对内容贫乏和内容丰富的视频进行分类。使用视频信息和质量指数(VIQI)、全球质量评分(GQS)和DISCERN来评估视频的质量。采用Mann-Whitney u检验、Spearman相关和线性回归分析进行统计分析。结果:对内容较差和内容较丰富的视频进行评价时，视频时长、点赞数、评论数、互动指数差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。内容丰富视频组的GQS评分、DISCERN评分、总内容评分、VIQI评分均显著高于内容贫乏视频组。交互指数与视频时长、视频信息内容质量呈正相关。结论:虽然患者在YouTube上分享的视频质量一般，但信息的内容普遍较差。然而，应该考虑到YouTube视频可以成为想要进行手术的患者的信息来源，这可能会影响手术过程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Angle Orthodontist 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The Angle Orthodontist is the official publication of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists and is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September and November by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc. The Angle Orthodontist is the only major journal in orthodontics with a non-commercial, non-profit publisher -- The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation. We value our freedom to operate exclusively in the best interests of our readers and authors. Our website www.angle.org is completely free and open to all visitors.