Effect of vitamin D receptor activators on cardiovascular events in patients on hemodialysis-A post hoc analysis of the LANDMARK study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Kiryu Yoshida, Takuya Mizukami, Masafumi Fukagawa, Tadao Akizawa, Hokuto Morohoshi, Takehiko Sambe, Akiko Takeshima, Hidetoshi Ito, Hiroaki Ogata, Naoki Uchida
{"title":"Effect of vitamin D receptor activators on cardiovascular events in patients on hemodialysis-A post hoc analysis of the LANDMARK study.","authors":"Kiryu Yoshida,&nbsp;Takuya Mizukami,&nbsp;Masafumi Fukagawa,&nbsp;Tadao Akizawa,&nbsp;Hokuto Morohoshi,&nbsp;Takehiko Sambe,&nbsp;Akiko Takeshima,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Ito,&nbsp;Hiroaki Ogata,&nbsp;Naoki Uchida","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.13954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical benefit of vitamin D receptor activators (VDRA) in patients with well-controlled secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing dialysis remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc analysis of the LANDMARK study investigates if VDRA use is associated with cardiovascular benefits. Data of 2135 patients undergoing hemodialysis who were at risk for vascular calcification were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with propensity-score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hazard ratio (HR) for VDRA use was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-1.46; p = 0.945) for cardiovascular events and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.62-1.28; p = 0.541) for all-cause mortality at baseline. Among patients who always used VDRA, the HR was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.67-1.89; p = 0.666) for cardiovascular events and 1.11 (95% CI: 0.67-1.85; p = 0.688) for all-cause mortality compared to those who never used VDRA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of VDRA does not reduce the risks of cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality in patients on dialysis with well-controlled secondary hyperparathyroidism.</p>","PeriodicalId":23021,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.13954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical benefit of vitamin D receptor activators (VDRA) in patients with well-controlled secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing dialysis remains unclear.

Methods: This post hoc analysis of the LANDMARK study investigates if VDRA use is associated with cardiovascular benefits. Data of 2135 patients undergoing hemodialysis who were at risk for vascular calcification were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with propensity-score matching.

Results: The hazard ratio (HR) for VDRA use was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-1.46; p = 0.945) for cardiovascular events and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.62-1.28; p = 0.541) for all-cause mortality at baseline. Among patients who always used VDRA, the HR was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.67-1.89; p = 0.666) for cardiovascular events and 1.11 (95% CI: 0.67-1.85; p = 0.688) for all-cause mortality compared to those who never used VDRA.

Conclusion: The use of VDRA does not reduce the risks of cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality in patients on dialysis with well-controlled secondary hyperparathyroidism.

维生素D受体激活剂对血液透析患者心血管事件的影响——LANDMARK研究的事后分析
维生素D受体激活剂(VDRA)在接受透析的控制良好的继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者中的临床益处尚不清楚。方法:这项LANDMARK研究的事后分析调查了VDRA的使用是否与心血管益处相关。采用倾向-评分匹配的Cox比例风险模型对2135例有血管钙化风险的血液透析患者的数据进行分析。结果:使用VDRA的风险比(HR)为0.99(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.67-1.46;p = 0.945)和0.89 (95% CI: 0.62-1.28;P = 0.541)的全因死亡率基线。在一直使用VDRA的患者中,HR为1.12 (95% CI: 0.67-1.89;p = 0.666)和1.11 (95% CI: 0.67-1.85;p = 0.688),与从未使用VDRA的患者相比,全因死亡率明显降低。结论:在控制良好的继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进透析患者中,使用VDRA并不能降低心血管事件或全因死亡率的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis is the official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. The Journal publishes original articles, editorial comments, review articles, case reports, meeting abstracts and Communications information on apheresis and dialysis technologies and treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信