Core Components of Moral Injury Groups Co-Facilitated by Mental Health Providers and Chaplains.

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Melissa A Smigelsky, Victoria Trimm, Keith Meador, George L Jackson, Jennifer H Wortmann, Jason A Nieuwsma
{"title":"Core Components of Moral Injury Groups Co-Facilitated by Mental Health Providers and Chaplains.","authors":"Melissa A Smigelsky,&nbsp;Victoria Trimm,&nbsp;Keith Meador,&nbsp;George L Jackson,&nbsp;Jennifer H Wortmann,&nbsp;Jason A Nieuwsma","doi":"10.1037/scp0000297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite increasing interest in moral injury, there is not yet consensus around what it is (and is not), who can have it and under what circumstances, or the degree and form of distress necessary to distinguish moral injury from other psychological and spiritual difficulties. The novelty of moral injury has created space for frontline Veterans Health Administration mental health and spiritual care providers to creatively apply their core professional skills and identities to moral injury. This paper presents findings of a core components analysis (CCA) derived from seven co-led chaplain-mental health moral injury group facilitation teams that were involved in a 16-month quality improvement endeavor of the Dynamic Diffusion Network (DDN). The DDN initiative engages providers in collaborative and iterative refinement of practices to promote rapid improvements in care for complex problems that lack a codified evidence base. Using CCA, we identified 10 core components of co-facilitated moral injury group care. Components include a clear conceptualization of moral injury, an inclusive approach to spirituality, and exploration of forgiveness, among others. This paper offers guidance that can be widely applied and readily adapted as our collective understanding of moral injury continues to expand and clarify. The core components are articulated here as principles for ongoing review and revision in response to future moral injury advances in the DDN and elsewhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":22080,"journal":{"name":"Spirituality in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288643/pdf/nihms-1889560.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spirituality in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Despite increasing interest in moral injury, there is not yet consensus around what it is (and is not), who can have it and under what circumstances, or the degree and form of distress necessary to distinguish moral injury from other psychological and spiritual difficulties. The novelty of moral injury has created space for frontline Veterans Health Administration mental health and spiritual care providers to creatively apply their core professional skills and identities to moral injury. This paper presents findings of a core components analysis (CCA) derived from seven co-led chaplain-mental health moral injury group facilitation teams that were involved in a 16-month quality improvement endeavor of the Dynamic Diffusion Network (DDN). The DDN initiative engages providers in collaborative and iterative refinement of practices to promote rapid improvements in care for complex problems that lack a codified evidence base. Using CCA, we identified 10 core components of co-facilitated moral injury group care. Components include a clear conceptualization of moral injury, an inclusive approach to spirituality, and exploration of forgiveness, among others. This paper offers guidance that can be widely applied and readily adapted as our collective understanding of moral injury continues to expand and clarify. The core components are articulated here as principles for ongoing review and revision in response to future moral injury advances in the DDN and elsewhere.

精神卫生服务提供者和牧师共同促进的道德伤害群体的核心组成部分。
尽管人们对道德伤害的兴趣越来越浓厚,但对于什么是道德伤害(什么不是),谁会有道德伤害,在什么情况下会有道德伤害,或者区分道德伤害与其他心理和精神困难所需的痛苦程度和形式,人们还没有达成共识。道德伤害的新颖性为前线退伍军人健康管理局的心理健康和精神护理提供者创造性地运用他们的核心专业技能和身份来处理道德伤害创造了空间。本文介绍了核心成分分析(CCA)的结果,该结果来源于七个共同领导的牧师-心理健康道德伤害小组促进小组,这些小组参与了为期16个月的动态扩散网络(DDN)质量改进工作。DDN计划使提供者参与协作和迭代改进实践,以促进对缺乏成文证据基础的复杂问题的护理的快速改进。使用CCA,我们确定了共同促进道德伤害群体护理的10个核心组成部分。其组成部分包括对道德伤害的明确概念,对灵性的包容方法,以及对宽恕的探索等等。随着我们对道德伤害的集体理解不断扩大和澄清,本文提供了可以广泛应用和容易适应的指导。本文将核心内容作为持续审查和修订的原则加以阐述,以应对DDN和其他地方未来的道德伤害进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spirituality in Clinical Practice
Spirituality in Clinical Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Spirituality in Clinical Practice ® (SCP) is a practice-oriented journal that encompasses spiritually-oriented psychotherapy and spirituality-sensitive cultural approaches to treatment and wellness. SCP is dedicated to integrating psychospiritual and other spiritually-oriented interventions involved in psychotherapy, consultation, coaching, health, and wellness. SCP provides a forum for those engaged in clinical activities to report on — and dialogue about — their activities to inform treatment models and future research initiatives. SCP fosters original scientific development in the field by highlighting actual and potential professional applications of spirituality in clinical practice. SCP seeks to initiate research questions through clinical insight and to introduce practice approaches supported or guided by existing research. SCP welcomes application of models from the related fields of medicine, integrative medicine, biology, neuroscience, ethnology, anthropology, and natural sciences. Research articles are highly encouraged on clinical conceptualization or settings, including studies on models, processes, or treatment approaches. Treatment studies may include clinical trials at any phase; studies on feasibility, curative factors, strategy, process, efficacy, or effectiveness; and meta-analytic or mixed-methods studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信