Sensitivity of ICD coding for sepsis in children-a population-based study.

Olga Endrich, Karen Triep, Luregn J Schlapbach, Klara M Posfay-Barbe, Ulrich Heininger, Eric Giannoni, Martin Stocker, Anita Niederer-Loher, Christian R Kahlert, Giancarlo Natalucci, Christa Relly, Thomas Riedel, Christoph Aebi, Christoph Berger, Philipp K A Agyeman
{"title":"Sensitivity of ICD coding for sepsis in children-a population-based study.","authors":"Olga Endrich,&nbsp;Karen Triep,&nbsp;Luregn J Schlapbach,&nbsp;Klara M Posfay-Barbe,&nbsp;Ulrich Heininger,&nbsp;Eric Giannoni,&nbsp;Martin Stocker,&nbsp;Anita Niederer-Loher,&nbsp;Christian R Kahlert,&nbsp;Giancarlo Natalucci,&nbsp;Christa Relly,&nbsp;Thomas Riedel,&nbsp;Christoph Aebi,&nbsp;Christoph Berger,&nbsp;Philipp K A Agyeman","doi":"10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) is widely used to describe the burden of disease.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe how well ICD-10 coding captures sepsis in children admitted to the hospital with blood culture-proven bacterial or fungal infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of a population-based, multicenter, prospective cohort study on children with blood culture-proven sepsis of nine tertiary pediatric hospitals in Switzerland. We compared the agreement of validated study data on sepsis criteria with ICD-10 coding abstraction obtained at the participating hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 998 hospital admissions of children with blood culture-proven sepsis. The sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 60% (95%-CI 57-63) for sepsis; 35% (95%-CI 31-39) for sepsis with organ dysfunction, using an explicit abstraction strategy; and 65% (95%-CI 61-69) using an implicit abstraction strategy. For septic shock, the sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 43% (95%-CI 37-50). Agreement of ICD-10 coding abstraction with validated study data varied by the underlying infection type and disease severity (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The estimated national incidence of sepsis, inferred from ICD-10 coding abstraction, was 12.5 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 11.7-13.5) and 21.0 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 19.8-22.2) using validated study data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this population-based study, we found a poor representation of sepsis and sepsis with organ dysfunction by ICD-10 coding abstraction in children with blood culture-proven sepsis when compared against a prospective validated research dataset. Sepsis estimates in children based on ICD-10 coding may thus severely underestimate the true prevalence of the disease.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":73402,"journal":{"name":"Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal","volume":"1 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) is widely used to describe the burden of disease.

Aim: To describe how well ICD-10 coding captures sepsis in children admitted to the hospital with blood culture-proven bacterial or fungal infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Methods: Secondary analysis of a population-based, multicenter, prospective cohort study on children with blood culture-proven sepsis of nine tertiary pediatric hospitals in Switzerland. We compared the agreement of validated study data on sepsis criteria with ICD-10 coding abstraction obtained at the participating hospitals.

Results: We analyzed 998 hospital admissions of children with blood culture-proven sepsis. The sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 60% (95%-CI 57-63) for sepsis; 35% (95%-CI 31-39) for sepsis with organ dysfunction, using an explicit abstraction strategy; and 65% (95%-CI 61-69) using an implicit abstraction strategy. For septic shock, the sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 43% (95%-CI 37-50). Agreement of ICD-10 coding abstraction with validated study data varied by the underlying infection type and disease severity (p < 0.05). The estimated national incidence of sepsis, inferred from ICD-10 coding abstraction, was 12.5 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 11.7-13.5) and 21.0 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 19.8-22.2) using validated study data.

Conclusions: In this population-based study, we found a poor representation of sepsis and sepsis with organ dysfunction by ICD-10 coding abstraction in children with blood culture-proven sepsis when compared against a prospective validated research dataset. Sepsis estimates in children based on ICD-10 coding may thus severely underestimate the true prevalence of the disease.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1.

Abstract Image

ICD编码对儿童败血症的敏感性——一项基于人群的研究。
背景:国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)被广泛用于描述疾病负担。目的:描述ICD-10编码在血液培养证实的细菌或真菌感染和全身炎症反应综合征入院儿童中捕获败血症的效果。方法:对一项基于人群的、多中心的前瞻性队列研究进行二次分析,该研究针对瑞士九所三级儿科医院血液培养证实的败血症儿童。我们比较了脓毒症标准的验证研究数据与参与医院获得的ICD-10编码摘要的一致性。结果:我们分析了998例经血培养证实的败血症患儿入院情况。ICD-10编码提取对脓毒症的敏感性为60% (95%-CI 57-63);35% (95%-CI 31-39)脓毒症合并器官功能障碍,采用明确的抽象策略;65% (95%-CI 61-69)使用隐式抽象策略。对于感染性休克,ICD-10编码提取的敏感性为43% (95%-CI 37-50)。结论:在这项基于人群的研究中,与前瞻性验证的研究数据集相比,我们发现在血液培养证实的败血症儿童中,ICD-10编码抽象对败血症和败血症伴器官功能障碍的代表性较差。因此,基于ICD-10编码的儿童败血症估计可能严重低估了该疾病的真实患病率。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信