Medication holidays in osteoporosis: evidence-based recommendations from the Italian guidelines on 'Diagnosis, risk stratification, and continuity of care of fragility fractures' based on a systematic literature review.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Silvia Migliaccio, Antimo Moretti, Annalisa Biffi, Raffaella Ronco, Gloria Porcu, Giovanni Adami, Rosaria Alvaro, Riccardo Bogini, Achille Patrizio Caputi, Luisella Cianferotti, Bruno Frediani, Davide Gatti, Stefano Gonnelli, Andrea Lenzi, Salvatore Leone, Tiziana Nicoletti, Marco Paoletta, Annalisa Pennini, Eleonora Piccirilli, Raffaella Michieli, Umberto Tarantino, Maurizio Rossini, Giovanni Corrao, Maria Luisa Brandi, Giovanni Iolascon
{"title":"Medication holidays in osteoporosis: evidence-based recommendations from the Italian guidelines on 'Diagnosis, risk stratification, and continuity of care of fragility fractures' based on a systematic literature review.","authors":"Silvia Migliaccio,&nbsp;Antimo Moretti,&nbsp;Annalisa Biffi,&nbsp;Raffaella Ronco,&nbsp;Gloria Porcu,&nbsp;Giovanni Adami,&nbsp;Rosaria Alvaro,&nbsp;Riccardo Bogini,&nbsp;Achille Patrizio Caputi,&nbsp;Luisella Cianferotti,&nbsp;Bruno Frediani,&nbsp;Davide Gatti,&nbsp;Stefano Gonnelli,&nbsp;Andrea Lenzi,&nbsp;Salvatore Leone,&nbsp;Tiziana Nicoletti,&nbsp;Marco Paoletta,&nbsp;Annalisa Pennini,&nbsp;Eleonora Piccirilli,&nbsp;Raffaella Michieli,&nbsp;Umberto Tarantino,&nbsp;Maurizio Rossini,&nbsp;Giovanni Corrao,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Brandi,&nbsp;Giovanni Iolascon","doi":"10.1177/1759720X231177110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noncommunicable, chronic diseases need pharmacological interventions for long periods or even throughout life. The temporary or permanent cessation of medication for a specific period, known as a 'medication holiday,' should be planned by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the association between continuity (adherence or persistence) of treatment and several outcomes in patients with fragility fractures in the context of the development of the Italian Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to November 2020 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies that analyzed medication holidays in patients with fragility fracture. Three authors independently extracted data and appraised the risk of bias of the included studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Effect sizes were pooled in a meta-analysis using random effects models. Primary outcomes were refracture and quality of life; secondary outcomes were mortality and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs and nine observational studies met our inclusion criteria, ranging from very low to moderate quality. The adherence to antiosteoporotic drugs was associated with a lower risk of nonvertebral fracture [relative risk (RR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.87; three studies] than nonadherence, whereas no difference was detected in the health-related quality of life. A reduction in refracture risk was observed when continuous treatment was compared to discontinuous therapy (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.98; three studies). A lower mortality rate was detected for the adherence and persistence measures, while no significant differences were noted in gastrointestinal side effects in individuals undergoing continuous <i>versus</i> discontinuous treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that clinicians should promote adherence and persistence to antiosteoporotic treatment in patients with fragility fractures unless serious adverse effects occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":23056,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/67/10.1177_1759720X231177110.PMC10286165.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X231177110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Noncommunicable, chronic diseases need pharmacological interventions for long periods or even throughout life. The temporary or permanent cessation of medication for a specific period, known as a 'medication holiday,' should be planned by healthcare professionals.

Objectives: We evaluated the association between continuity (adherence or persistence) of treatment and several outcomes in patients with fragility fractures in the context of the development of the Italian Guidelines.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources and methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to November 2020 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies that analyzed medication holidays in patients with fragility fracture. Three authors independently extracted data and appraised the risk of bias of the included studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Effect sizes were pooled in a meta-analysis using random effects models. Primary outcomes were refracture and quality of life; secondary outcomes were mortality and treatment-related adverse events.

Results: Six RCTs and nine observational studies met our inclusion criteria, ranging from very low to moderate quality. The adherence to antiosteoporotic drugs was associated with a lower risk of nonvertebral fracture [relative risk (RR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.87; three studies] than nonadherence, whereas no difference was detected in the health-related quality of life. A reduction in refracture risk was observed when continuous treatment was compared to discontinuous therapy (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.98; three studies). A lower mortality rate was detected for the adherence and persistence measures, while no significant differences were noted in gastrointestinal side effects in individuals undergoing continuous versus discontinuous treatment.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that clinicians should promote adherence and persistence to antiosteoporotic treatment in patients with fragility fractures unless serious adverse effects occur.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

骨质疏松症的药物假期:基于系统文献综述的意大利“脆性骨折的诊断、风险分层和连续性护理”指南的循证建议。
背景:非传染性慢性疾病需要长期甚至终生的药物干预。临时或永久停止药物的特定时期,称为“药物假期”,应由医疗保健专业人员计划。目的:在意大利指南制定的背景下,我们评估了治疗的连续性(依从性或持久性)与脆性骨折患者的几个结局之间的关系。设计:系统回顾。数据来源和方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,检索截至2020年11月的随机临床试验(rct)和观察性研究,分析脆性骨折患者的药物治疗假期。三位作者独立提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。证据质量采用建议分级评估、发展和评价方法进行评估。使用随机效应模型在荟萃分析中汇总效应大小。主要结局为复发和生活质量;次要结局是死亡率和治疗相关不良事件。结果:6项随机对照试验和9项观察性研究符合我们的纳入标准,质量从极低到中等。坚持服用抗骨质疏松药物与较低的非椎体骨折风险相关[相对危险度(RR) 0.42, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.20-0.87;三项研究]与不依从性相比,而在与健康相关的生活质量方面没有发现差异。与间断治疗相比,连续治疗可降低再骨折风险(RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.98;三个研究)。研究发现,坚持治疗和坚持治疗的死亡率较低,而在连续治疗和间断治疗的个体中,胃肠道副作用没有显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果提示临床医生应促进脆性骨折患者坚持和坚持抗骨质疏松治疗,除非发生严重的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of musculoskeletal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信