“Doing What We Can with What We Have”: Examining the role of local government in poverty management during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Fiona Long , Joshua Evans
{"title":"“Doing What We Can with What We Have”: Examining the role of local government in poverty management during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Fiona Long ,&nbsp;Joshua Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the dawn of the COVID-19 pandemic and concern regarding the subsequent vulnerabilities of houseless populations, countries have sought to adapt and enhance emergency housing policies with a view of better protecting this population. Drawing on the poverty management perspective, this article focuses on local government and its role in managing houselessness during the COVID-19 pandemic. It achieves this by treating local council meetings as sites of problematization, in which the management of houselessness is rationalized and solutions negotiated. We transcribed local council meetings in Bristol, England and Edmonton, Canada, for an 18-month period from March 2020. Our analysis found that a common set of ‘problem spaces’ - systems, strategic opportunism and power - were evoked by municipal officials in both cities. Under the umbrella of ‘doing what we can’, local councils: conceptualized houselessness as complex and systemic; identified what does and does not work; discussed jurisdictional limitations and their impact; and defended new forms of accommodation. Significantly, despite the discursive desire to ‘build back better’, and a slightly rebalanced poverty management landscape in terms of care and control, local governments alone were unable to end houselessness within the post-COVID city.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 103812"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718523001380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the dawn of the COVID-19 pandemic and concern regarding the subsequent vulnerabilities of houseless populations, countries have sought to adapt and enhance emergency housing policies with a view of better protecting this population. Drawing on the poverty management perspective, this article focuses on local government and its role in managing houselessness during the COVID-19 pandemic. It achieves this by treating local council meetings as sites of problematization, in which the management of houselessness is rationalized and solutions negotiated. We transcribed local council meetings in Bristol, England and Edmonton, Canada, for an 18-month period from March 2020. Our analysis found that a common set of ‘problem spaces’ - systems, strategic opportunism and power - were evoked by municipal officials in both cities. Under the umbrella of ‘doing what we can’, local councils: conceptualized houselessness as complex and systemic; identified what does and does not work; discussed jurisdictional limitations and their impact; and defended new forms of accommodation. Significantly, despite the discursive desire to ‘build back better’, and a slightly rebalanced poverty management landscape in terms of care and control, local governments alone were unable to end houselessness within the post-COVID city.

“量力而行”:考察地方政府在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在贫困管理中的作用
随着2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的到来,以及对无家可归者随后的脆弱性的担忧,各国都在努力调整和加强应急住房政策,以期更好地保护这一人群。本文从贫困管理的角度出发,重点关注地方政府及其在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间管理无家可归问题中的作用。它通过将地方议会会议作为解决问题的场所来实现这一目标,使无家可归者的管理合理化,并通过谈判解决问题。从2020年3月开始,我们记录了英国布里斯托尔和加拿大埃德蒙顿的地方议会会议,为期18个月。我们的分析发现,两个城市的市政官员都提出了一套共同的“问题空间”——制度、战略机会主义和权力。在“尽我们所能”的保护伞下,地方议会:将无家可归问题概念化为复杂和系统性的;确定什么可行,什么不可行;讨论了管辖权限制及其影响;并为新的住宿形式辩护。值得注意的是,尽管人们口头上希望“重建得更好”,并且在照顾和控制方面对贫困管理格局进行了略微重新平衡,但仅靠地方政府无法结束后疫情城市的无家可归问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信