Comparison of the use of blood pressure telemonitoring versus standard medical care in the achievement of short-term therapeutic goals in blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: An open-label clinical trial.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
M G Ramos-Zavala, F Grover-Páez, E G Cardona-Muñoz, D Cardona-Müller, A G Alanis-Sánchez, S Pascoe-González, D Roman-Rojas, C G Ramos-Becerra, H Alvarez-López, A Chávez-Mendoza, G J De la Peña-Topete, J M Enciso-Muñóz, A Estrada-Suárez, H Galvan-Oseguera, A Guerra-López, P Gutiérrez-Fajardo, K Lupercio-Mora, S N Nikos-Christo, S Palomo-Piñón, E Ruíz-Gastelum, R G Velasco-Sánchez
{"title":"Comparison of the use of blood pressure telemonitoring versus standard medical care in the achievement of short-term therapeutic goals in blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: An open-label clinical trial.","authors":"M G Ramos-Zavala,&nbsp;F Grover-Páez,&nbsp;E G Cardona-Muñoz,&nbsp;D Cardona-Müller,&nbsp;A G Alanis-Sánchez,&nbsp;S Pascoe-González,&nbsp;D Roman-Rojas,&nbsp;C G Ramos-Becerra,&nbsp;H Alvarez-López,&nbsp;A Chávez-Mendoza,&nbsp;G J De la Peña-Topete,&nbsp;J M Enciso-Muñóz,&nbsp;A Estrada-Suárez,&nbsp;H Galvan-Oseguera,&nbsp;A Guerra-López,&nbsp;P Gutiérrez-Fajardo,&nbsp;K Lupercio-Mora,&nbsp;S N Nikos-Christo,&nbsp;S Palomo-Piñón,&nbsp;E Ruíz-Gastelum,&nbsp;R G Velasco-Sánchez","doi":"10.1177/20480040231178585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Mexico less than half of the treated hypertensive patients reach blood pressure (BP) targets. Most hypertensive individuals rely on the standard medical care (SMC) to achieve the BP control goals; however, the efficacy of BP telemonitoring (BPT) to achieve BP targets has been poorly studied.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy of BPT versus SMC to achieve BP goals in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm, open-label clinical trial was conducted in patients ≥18 years with uncontrolled hypertension. The participants were randomized to 2 arms (BPT vs SMC) and followed for 12 weeks. For the statistical analysis, the chi-squared test and covariance were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and seventy-eight participants were included, BPT (n = 94) and SMC (n = 84), after 12 weeks of follow up, we observed a baseline-adjusted reduction in systolic BP with both BPT (-13.5 [1.3] mmHg) and the SMC (-5.9 [1.4] mmHg; p < 0.001) but a greater decrease with BPT (p < 0.001). Likewise, we found a baseline-adjusted reduction of diastolic BP with BPT (-6.9 [0.9] mmHg) and SMC (-2.7 [0.9] mmHg) (p = 0.007) with a more significant percentage change from baseline with BPT (-6.8% [1.0] vs 2.5% [1.1]; p = 0.007). In the BPT arm, a larger proportion of patients achieved the BP target versus SMC (30.5% vs 12.8%; p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BPT showed a greater proportion of patients achieving office BP control goals (<140/90 mmHg), compared to standard medical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20480040231178585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e5/4e/10.1177_20480040231178585.PMC10280509.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040231178585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Mexico less than half of the treated hypertensive patients reach blood pressure (BP) targets. Most hypertensive individuals rely on the standard medical care (SMC) to achieve the BP control goals; however, the efficacy of BP telemonitoring (BPT) to achieve BP targets has been poorly studied.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of BPT versus SMC to achieve BP goals in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Methods: A two-arm, open-label clinical trial was conducted in patients ≥18 years with uncontrolled hypertension. The participants were randomized to 2 arms (BPT vs SMC) and followed for 12 weeks. For the statistical analysis, the chi-squared test and covariance were used.

Results: One hundred and seventy-eight participants were included, BPT (n = 94) and SMC (n = 84), after 12 weeks of follow up, we observed a baseline-adjusted reduction in systolic BP with both BPT (-13.5 [1.3] mmHg) and the SMC (-5.9 [1.4] mmHg; p < 0.001) but a greater decrease with BPT (p < 0.001). Likewise, we found a baseline-adjusted reduction of diastolic BP with BPT (-6.9 [0.9] mmHg) and SMC (-2.7 [0.9] mmHg) (p = 0.007) with a more significant percentage change from baseline with BPT (-6.8% [1.0] vs 2.5% [1.1]; p = 0.007). In the BPT arm, a larger proportion of patients achieved the BP target versus SMC (30.5% vs 12.8%; p = 0.005).

Conclusion: BPT showed a greater proportion of patients achieving office BP control goals (<140/90 mmHg), compared to standard medical care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项开放标签临床试验:使用血压远程监测与标准医疗护理在实现未控制高血压患者血压短期治疗目标方面的比较
背景:在墨西哥,接受治疗的高血压患者中达到血压(BP)目标的不到一半。大多数高血压患者依靠标准医疗护理(SMC)来实现血压控制目标;然而,BP远程监测(BPT)实现BP目标的有效性研究甚少。目的:比较BPT与SMC对未控制高血压患者实现血压目标的疗效。方法:在≥18岁的高血压未控制患者中进行一项双组、开放标签临床试验。参与者被随机分为两组(BPT vs SMC),随访12周。统计分析采用卡方检验和协方差分析。结果:178名参与者被纳入,BPT (n = 94)和SMC (n = 84),经过12周的随访,我们观察到BPT (-13.5 [1.3] mmHg)和SMC (-5.9 [1.4] mmHg)的基线调整后收缩压降低;p结论:BPT显示更大比例的患者达到办公室血压控制目标(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信