Trend in Clinical Trial Participation During COVID-19: A Secondary Analysis of the I-SPY COVID Clinical Trial.

Critical Care Explorations Pub Date : 2023-06-19 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000930
Philip Yang, Neal W Dickert, Angela Haczku, Christine Spainhour, Sara C Auld
{"title":"Trend in Clinical Trial Participation During COVID-19: A Secondary Analysis of the I-SPY COVID Clinical Trial.","authors":"Philip Yang, Neal W Dickert, Angela Haczku, Christine Spainhour, Sara C Auld","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To analyze the temporal trend in enrollment rates in a COVID-19 platform trial during the first three waves of the pandemic in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of data from the I-SPY COVID randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirty-one hospitals throughout the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients who were approached, either directly or via a legally authorized representative, for consent and enrollment into the I-SPY COVID RCT.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 1,338 patients approached for the I-SPY COVID trial from July 30, 2020, to February 17, 2022, the number of patients who enrolled (<i>n</i> = 1,063) versus declined participation (<i>n</i> = 275) was used to calculate monthly enrollment rates. Overall, demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were similar between those who enrolled versus declined. Enrollment rates fluctuated over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, but there were no significant trends over time (Mann-Kendall test, <i>p</i> = 0.21). Enrollment rates were also comparable between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, age, sex, region of residence, COVID-19 severity of illness, and vaccination status were not significantly associated with the decision to decline consent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this secondary analysis of the I-SPY COVID clinical trial, there was no significant association between the enrollment rate and time period or vaccination status among all eligible patients approached for clinical trial participation. Additional studies are needed to better understand whether the COVID-19 pandemic has altered clinical trial participation and to develop strategies for encouraging participation in future COVID-19 and critical care clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 6","pages":"e0930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/30/cc9-5-e0930.PMC10281328.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To analyze the temporal trend in enrollment rates in a COVID-19 platform trial during the first three waves of the pandemic in the United States.

Design: Secondary analysis of data from the I-SPY COVID randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Setting: Thirty-one hospitals throughout the United States.

Patients: Patients who were approached, either directly or via a legally authorized representative, for consent and enrollment into the I-SPY COVID RCT.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Among 1,338 patients approached for the I-SPY COVID trial from July 30, 2020, to February 17, 2022, the number of patients who enrolled (n = 1,063) versus declined participation (n = 275) was used to calculate monthly enrollment rates. Overall, demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were similar between those who enrolled versus declined. Enrollment rates fluctuated over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, but there were no significant trends over time (Mann-Kendall test, p = 0.21). Enrollment rates were also comparable between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, age, sex, region of residence, COVID-19 severity of illness, and vaccination status were not significantly associated with the decision to decline consent.

Conclusions: In this secondary analysis of the I-SPY COVID clinical trial, there was no significant association between the enrollment rate and time period or vaccination status among all eligible patients approached for clinical trial participation. Additional studies are needed to better understand whether the COVID-19 pandemic has altered clinical trial participation and to develop strategies for encouraging participation in future COVID-19 and critical care clinical trials.

Abstract Image

COVID-19 期间临床试验参与趋势:对 I-SPY COVID 临床试验的二次分析。
分析美国大流行前三波期间COVID-19平台试验注册率的时间趋势:对I-SPY COVID随机对照试验(RCT)数据进行二次分析:环境:全美 31 家医院:患者:直接或通过合法授权代表征得同意并加入 I-SPY COVID RCT 的患者:测量和主要结果在 2020 年 7 月 30 日至 2022 年 2 月 17 日期间接触的 1,338 名 I-SPY COVID 试验患者中,使用注册患者人数(n = 1,063 人)与拒绝参与患者人数(n = 275 人)计算每月注册率。总体而言,加入与拒绝加入的患者的人口统计学特征和基线临床特征相似。注册率在 COVID-19 大流行期间有所波动,但没有明显的变化趋势(Mann-Kendall 检验,p = 0.21)。已接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者的登记率也相当。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,年龄、性别、居住地区、COVID-19 疾病严重程度和疫苗接种情况与拒绝同意的决定无明显关联:在对 I-SPY COVID 临床试验的二次分析中,所有符合临床试验条件的患者的入组率与时间段或疫苗接种情况之间没有明显关联。为了更好地了解 COVID-19 大流行是否改变了临床试验的参与情况,并制定鼓励参与未来 COVID-19 和重症监护临床试验的策略,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信