Associations between Contraceptive Decision-Making and Marital Contraceptive Communication and use in Rural Maharashtra, India.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Studies in Family Planning Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1111/sifp.12214
Melody Nazarbegian, Sarah Averbach, Nicole E Johns, Mohan Ghule, Jay Silverman, Rebecka Lundgren, Madhusudana Battala, Shahina Begum, Anita Raj
{"title":"Associations between Contraceptive Decision-Making and Marital Contraceptive Communication and use in Rural Maharashtra, India.","authors":"Melody Nazarbegian, Sarah Averbach, Nicole E Johns, Mohan Ghule, Jay Silverman, Rebecka Lundgren, Madhusudana Battala, Shahina Begum, Anita Raj","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women's contraceptive decision-making control is crucial for reproductive autonomy, but research largely relies on the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) measure which asks who is involved with decision-making. In India, this typically assesses joint decision-making or male engagement. Newer measures emphasize female agency. We examined three measures of contraceptive decision-making, the DHS and two agency-focused measures, to assess their associations with marital contraceptive communication and use in rural Maharashtra, India. We analyzed follow-up survey data from women participating in the CHARM2 study (n = 1088), collected in June-December 2020. The survey included the DHS (measure 1), Reproductive Decision-Making Agency (measure 2), and Contraceptive Final Decision-Maker measures (measure 3). Only Measure 1 was significantly associated with contraceptive communication (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.75, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 1.69-4.49) and use (AOR: 1.73, 95 percent CI: 1.14-2.63). However, each measure was associated with different types of contraceptive use: Measure 1 with condom (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR]: 1.99, 95 percent CI: 1.12-3.51) and intrauterine device (IUD) (aRRR: 4.76, 95 percent CI: 1.80-12.59), Measure 2 with IUD (aRRR: 1.64, 95 percent CI: 1.04-2.60), and Measure 3 with pill (aRRR: 2.00, 95 percent CI: 1.14-3.52). Among married women in Maharashtra, India, male engagement in decision-making may be a stronger predictor of contraceptive communication and use than women's agency, but agency may be predictive of types of contraceptives used.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"53 4","pages":"617-637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695302/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Women's contraceptive decision-making control is crucial for reproductive autonomy, but research largely relies on the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) measure which asks who is involved with decision-making. In India, this typically assesses joint decision-making or male engagement. Newer measures emphasize female agency. We examined three measures of contraceptive decision-making, the DHS and two agency-focused measures, to assess their associations with marital contraceptive communication and use in rural Maharashtra, India. We analyzed follow-up survey data from women participating in the CHARM2 study (n = 1088), collected in June-December 2020. The survey included the DHS (measure 1), Reproductive Decision-Making Agency (measure 2), and Contraceptive Final Decision-Maker measures (measure 3). Only Measure 1 was significantly associated with contraceptive communication (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.75, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 1.69-4.49) and use (AOR: 1.73, 95 percent CI: 1.14-2.63). However, each measure was associated with different types of contraceptive use: Measure 1 with condom (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR]: 1.99, 95 percent CI: 1.12-3.51) and intrauterine device (IUD) (aRRR: 4.76, 95 percent CI: 1.80-12.59), Measure 2 with IUD (aRRR: 1.64, 95 percent CI: 1.04-2.60), and Measure 3 with pill (aRRR: 2.00, 95 percent CI: 1.14-3.52). Among married women in Maharashtra, India, male engagement in decision-making may be a stronger predictor of contraceptive communication and use than women's agency, but agency may be predictive of types of contraceptives used.

印度马哈拉施特拉邦农村地区避孕决策与婚姻避孕沟通和使用之间的关系。
妇女避孕决策控制对生殖自主至关重要,但研究在很大程度上依赖于人口与健康调查(DHS)的措施,该措施询问谁参与决策。在印度,这通常是对共同决策或男性参与的评估。新的措施强调女性的能动性。我们检查了三种避孕决策措施,即DHS和两种以机构为重点的措施,以评估它们与印度马哈拉施特拉邦农村婚姻避孕传播和使用的关系。我们分析了2020年6月至12月收集的参与CHARM2研究的女性的随访调查数据(n = 1088)。调查包括DHS(措施1)、生殖决策机构(措施2)和避孕最终决策者措施(措施3)。只有措施1与避孕传播(调整优势比[AOR]: 2.75, 95%置信区间[CI]: 1.69-4.49)和使用(AOR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.14-2.63)显著相关。然而,每项措施都与不同类型的避孕措施使用有关:措施1使用避孕套(调整相对风险比[aRRR]: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.12-3.51)和宫内节育器(aRRR: 4.76, 95% CI: 1.80-12.59),措施2使用宫内节育器(aRRR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.04-2.60),措施3使用避孕药(aRRR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.14-3.52)。在印度马哈拉施特拉邦的已婚妇女中,男性参与决策可能比女性代理更能预测避孕措施的传播和使用,但代理可能预测使用的避孕措施的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信