Charitable Giving in Times of Covid-19: Do Crises Forward the Better or the Worse in Individuals?

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Julia Litofcenko, Michael Meyer, Michaela Neumayr, Astrid Pennerstorfer
{"title":"Charitable Giving in Times of Covid-19: Do Crises Forward the Better or the Worse in Individuals?","authors":"Julia Litofcenko, Michael Meyer, Michaela Neumayr, Astrid Pennerstorfer","doi":"10.1007/s11266-023-00558-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Why did some individuals react to the Covid-19 crisis in a prosocial manner, whereas others withdrew from society? To shed light onto this question, we investigate changing patterns of charitable giving during the pandemic. The study analyzes survey data of 2000 individuals, representative of the populations of Germany and Austria. Logistic regressions reveal that personal affectedness by Covid-19 seems to play a crucial role: those who were personally affected either mentally, financially, or health-wise during the first 12 months of Covid-19 were most likely to have changed their giving behavior. The observed patterns fit psychological explanations of how human beings process existential threats. Our findings indicate that a profound societal crisis in itself mainly leads to changes in charitable giving if individuals are severely affected on a personal level. Thereby, we contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying individuals' charitable giving behavior in times of crisis.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11266-023-00558-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":48082,"journal":{"name":"Voluntas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voluntas","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00558-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why did some individuals react to the Covid-19 crisis in a prosocial manner, whereas others withdrew from society? To shed light onto this question, we investigate changing patterns of charitable giving during the pandemic. The study analyzes survey data of 2000 individuals, representative of the populations of Germany and Austria. Logistic regressions reveal that personal affectedness by Covid-19 seems to play a crucial role: those who were personally affected either mentally, financially, or health-wise during the first 12 months of Covid-19 were most likely to have changed their giving behavior. The observed patterns fit psychological explanations of how human beings process existential threats. Our findings indicate that a profound societal crisis in itself mainly leads to changes in charitable giving if individuals are severely affected on a personal level. Thereby, we contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying individuals' charitable giving behavior in times of crisis.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11266-023-00558-y.

新冠肺炎时代的慈善捐赠:个人的危机是好是坏?
为什么一些人以亲社会的方式对新冠肺炎危机做出反应,而另一些人则退出了社会?为了阐明这个问题,我们调查了疫情期间慈善捐赠模式的变化。该研究分析了代表德国和奥地利人口的2000人的调查数据。逻辑回归显示,新冠肺炎对个人的影响似乎起着至关重要的作用:那些在新冠肺炎前12个月受到精神、经济或健康影响的人最有可能改变他们的奉献行为。观察到的模式符合人类如何处理生存威胁的心理学解释。我们的研究结果表明,如果个人在个人层面受到严重影响,深刻的社会危机本身主要会导致慈善捐赠的变化。因此,我们有助于更好地理解危机时期个人慈善捐赠行为的机制。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,请访问10.1007/s11266-023-00558-y。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Voluntas
Voluntas SOCIAL ISSUES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Society for Third-Sector Research, Voluntas is an interdisciplinary international journal that aims to be the central forum for worldwide research in the area between the state, market, and household sectors. The journal combines full-length articles with shorter research notes (reflecting the latest developments in the field) and book reviews. Voluntas is essential reading for all those engaged in research into the Third Sector (voluntary and nonprofit organizations) including economists, lawyers, political scientists, psychologists, sociologists, and social and public policy analysts. It aims to present leading-edge academic argument around civil society issues in a style that is accessible to practitioners and policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信