Time taken to perform a rapid sequence intubation within a simulated prehospital environment.

C Vincent-Lambert, R Loftus
{"title":"Time taken to perform a rapid sequence intubation within a simulated prehospital environment.","authors":"C Vincent-Lambert,&nbsp;R Loftus","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i2.368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) involves inducing unconsciousness and paralysis in rapid succession in order to facilitate endotracheal tube placement. RSI has recently been introduced to the scope of practice of South African prehospital emergency care practitioners (ECPs). Despite this, there remains limited evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of RSI within this context. While in-hospital studies have shown that it can take 20 minutes or more to perform an RSI, little is known about the time taken to perform the procedure in the prehospital setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure the time taken to perform an RSI in a simulated prehospital environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of final-year ECP students were video-recorded performing RSIs on a mannequin within a simulated prehospital environment. Data were gathered through an analysis of the recordings, allowing for the capturing of times taken to complete each of the phases of a RSI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mean time of 15 minutes 5 seconds was recorded to complete the procedure. This was shorter than times reported for in-hospital studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSI is a potentially harmful procedure if improperly performed and has the potential to create delays in transport that may not always be in the patient's best interest. With a mean time of 15 minutes 5 seconds, the performance of RSI by ECP students in the simulated prehospital environment was faster than expected. Further research is recommended to explore the relationship between the performances observed in this mannequin-based study with those in authentic prehospital settings.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>This study adds to a currently limited body of knowledge surrounding the performance of out-of-hospital anaesthesia by emergency care practitioners in the African context. The study highlights the fact that while prehospital rapid sequence intubation may be a lifesaving procedure, anaesthetising patients in an uncontrolled prehospital environment is not without risk. An important consideration that needs to be taken into account when making a decision on whether or not to perform the procedure within the prehospital setting is the potential delay this might have on transport time and arrival at the receiving facility.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i2.368","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i2.368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) involves inducing unconsciousness and paralysis in rapid succession in order to facilitate endotracheal tube placement. RSI has recently been introduced to the scope of practice of South African prehospital emergency care practitioners (ECPs). Despite this, there remains limited evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of RSI within this context. While in-hospital studies have shown that it can take 20 minutes or more to perform an RSI, little is known about the time taken to perform the procedure in the prehospital setting.

Objectives: To measure the time taken to perform an RSI in a simulated prehospital environment.

Methods: A sample of final-year ECP students were video-recorded performing RSIs on a mannequin within a simulated prehospital environment. Data were gathered through an analysis of the recordings, allowing for the capturing of times taken to complete each of the phases of a RSI.

Results: A mean time of 15 minutes 5 seconds was recorded to complete the procedure. This was shorter than times reported for in-hospital studies.

Conclusion: RSI is a potentially harmful procedure if improperly performed and has the potential to create delays in transport that may not always be in the patient's best interest. With a mean time of 15 minutes 5 seconds, the performance of RSI by ECP students in the simulated prehospital environment was faster than expected. Further research is recommended to explore the relationship between the performances observed in this mannequin-based study with those in authentic prehospital settings.

Contributions of the study: This study adds to a currently limited body of knowledge surrounding the performance of out-of-hospital anaesthesia by emergency care practitioners in the African context. The study highlights the fact that while prehospital rapid sequence intubation may be a lifesaving procedure, anaesthetising patients in an uncontrolled prehospital environment is not without risk. An important consideration that needs to be taken into account when making a decision on whether or not to perform the procedure within the prehospital setting is the potential delay this might have on transport time and arrival at the receiving facility.

在模拟院前环境中进行快速顺序插管所需的时间。
背景:快速顺序插管(RSI)涉及快速连续诱导无意识和麻痹,以便于气管内插管放置。RSI最近被引入到南非院前急救从业人员(ECPs)的实践范围。尽管如此,在这种情况下,支持RSI的有效性和安全性的证据仍然有限。虽然医院内的研究表明,执行RSI可能需要20分钟或更长时间,但在院前环境中执行该程序所需的时间知之甚少。目的:测量在模拟院前环境中执行RSI所需的时间。方法:在模拟院前环境中,对一名最后一年的ECP学生进行录像,在人体模型上进行rsi。通过对记录的分析收集数据,允许捕获完成RSI每个阶段所需的时间。结果:完成手术平均时间为15分5秒。这比住院研究报告的时间要短。结论:如果操作不当,RSI是一种潜在的有害手术,并且有可能造成运输延迟,这可能并不总是符合患者的最佳利益。ECP学生在模拟院前环境中的RSI表现比预期快,平均时间为15分5秒。建议进一步的研究来探索在这个基于人体模型的研究中观察到的表现与真实院前环境中的表现之间的关系。本研究的贡献:本研究增加了目前有限的关于非洲急诊护理从业人员院外麻醉表现的知识体系。该研究强调了这样一个事实,即院前快速顺序插管可能是一种挽救生命的程序,在不受控制的院前环境中麻醉患者并非没有风险。在决定是否在院前环境中执行该程序时,需要考虑的一个重要因素是这可能对运输时间和到达接收设施造成的潜在延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信