Victor F Quiroz, Júlia R Lima, Felipe E Pinotti, Rosemary Ac Marcantonio, Elcio Marcantonio, Guilherme Jpl Oliveira
{"title":"Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and native bone. A preclinical study.","authors":"Victor F Quiroz, Júlia R Lima, Felipe E Pinotti, Rosemary Ac Marcantonio, Elcio Marcantonio, Guilherme Jpl Oliveira","doi":"10.54589/aol.35/1/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of implants placed in rat tibia sites grafted with Deproteinized Bovine Bone (DBB) and Native Bone (NB). Twenty-eight rats were divided into two groups according to the type of substrate in which the implants were to be placed: NB - implants placed in native bone; DBB - implants placed in areas grafted with DBB. In the DBB group, the bone defect was made and filled with the bone substitute 60 days before placing the implant. The animals were euthanized 15 or 45 days after implant placement. Osseointegration was assessed by the removal torque, volume of mineralized tissues around the implants (BV/TV), bone-implant contact (%BIC), and bone between threads (%BBT). The implants placed in NB presented higher removal torque (8.00 ± 1.26 Ncm vs. 2.33 ± 0.41 Ncm at 15 days and 22.00 ± 2.44 Ncm vs. 4.00 ± 1.41 Ncm at 45 days), higher %BV/TV (47.92 ± 1.54% vs. 33.33 ± 4.77% at 15 days and 70.06 ± 0.91% vs. 39.89±5.90%at 45 days), higher %BIC (39.68 ± 5.02% vs. 9.12 ± 5.56% at 15 days and 83.23 ± 4.42% vs. 18.81 ± 7.21% at 45 days), and higher %BBT (34.33 ± 5.42% vs. 13.24 ± 8.72% at 15 days and 82.33 ± 3.13% vs. 22.26 ± 8.27% at 45 days) than the implants placed in DBB grafted areas. The degree of osseointegration was lower in implants placed in the area grafted with DBB than in NB in rat tibias.</p>","PeriodicalId":7033,"journal":{"name":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ec/f5/1852-4834-35-1-03.PMC10283429.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/1/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of implants placed in rat tibia sites grafted with Deproteinized Bovine Bone (DBB) and Native Bone (NB). Twenty-eight rats were divided into two groups according to the type of substrate in which the implants were to be placed: NB - implants placed in native bone; DBB - implants placed in areas grafted with DBB. In the DBB group, the bone defect was made and filled with the bone substitute 60 days before placing the implant. The animals were euthanized 15 or 45 days after implant placement. Osseointegration was assessed by the removal torque, volume of mineralized tissues around the implants (BV/TV), bone-implant contact (%BIC), and bone between threads (%BBT). The implants placed in NB presented higher removal torque (8.00 ± 1.26 Ncm vs. 2.33 ± 0.41 Ncm at 15 days and 22.00 ± 2.44 Ncm vs. 4.00 ± 1.41 Ncm at 45 days), higher %BV/TV (47.92 ± 1.54% vs. 33.33 ± 4.77% at 15 days and 70.06 ± 0.91% vs. 39.89±5.90%at 45 days), higher %BIC (39.68 ± 5.02% vs. 9.12 ± 5.56% at 15 days and 83.23 ± 4.42% vs. 18.81 ± 7.21% at 45 days), and higher %BBT (34.33 ± 5.42% vs. 13.24 ± 8.72% at 15 days and 82.33 ± 3.13% vs. 22.26 ± 8.27% at 45 days) than the implants placed in DBB grafted areas. The degree of osseointegration was lower in implants placed in the area grafted with DBB than in NB in rat tibias.
本研究的目的是评估脱蛋白牛骨(DBB)和天然骨(NB)植入大鼠胫骨部位的骨整合性。28只大鼠根据植入基质的类型分为两组:NB -植入原生骨;DBB -植入物放置在已植入DBB的区域。DBB组在放置种植体前60天制作骨缺损并用骨替代物填充。这些动物在植入后15天或45天被安乐死。通过移除扭矩、种植体周围矿化组织体积(BV/TV)、骨与种植体接触(%BIC)和螺纹间骨(%BBT)来评估骨整合。放置在NB的种植体具有更高的去除扭矩(15天8.00±1.26 Ncm vs 2.33±0.41 Ncm, 45天22.00±2.44 Ncm vs 4.00±1.41 Ncm),更高的BV/TV %(15天47.92±1.54% vs 33.33±4.77%,45天70.06±0.91% vs 39.89±5.90%),更高的BIC %(15天39.68±5.02% vs 9.12±5.56%,45天83.23±4.42% vs 18.81±7.21%)。BBT的百分比(15 d 34.33±5.42% vs. 13.24±8.72%,45 d 82.33±3.13% vs. 22.26±8.27%)高于DBB移植物区。在大鼠胫骨中,植入DBB区域的骨整合程度低于NB区域。