{"title":"Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation in Reducing Inflammation: An Umbrella Review","authors":"Marc P. McRae DC","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to review meta-analyses on the effectiveness of coenzyme Q10<span> supplementation in reducing inflammation through changes in the inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α).</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An umbrella review of all published meta-analyses was performed. A PubMed search from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 2021, was conducted using the following search strategy: “(coenzyme q10 OR CoQ10 OR ubiquinone OR ubiquinol) AND (meta-analysis OR systematic review)”. Only English language publications that provided quantitative statistical analysis on coenzyme Q10 supplementation and markers of inflammation were retrieved.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven meta-analyses were retrieved for inclusion in this umbrella review, and for all 3 inflammatory biomarker marker groups, the median intake of supplemental coenzyme Q10 was 200 mg/d for a median duration of 12 weeks. For C-reactive protein, only 3 of the 7 meta-analyses presented with statistically significant reductions, while statistically significant reductions in IL-6 and TNF-α for were observed in 4 of the 5 meta-analyses and 3 of the 4 meta-analyses, respectively. However, statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in the majority of these meta-analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The majority of included meta-analyses showed that coenzyme Q10 supplementation significantly decreased the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α. However, heterogeneity was observed in the majority of these meta-analyses, and therefore the results should be interpreted with caution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722001079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to review meta-analyses on the effectiveness of coenzyme Q10 supplementation in reducing inflammation through changes in the inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α).
Methods
An umbrella review of all published meta-analyses was performed. A PubMed search from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 2021, was conducted using the following search strategy: “(coenzyme q10 OR CoQ10 OR ubiquinone OR ubiquinol) AND (meta-analysis OR systematic review)”. Only English language publications that provided quantitative statistical analysis on coenzyme Q10 supplementation and markers of inflammation were retrieved.
Results
Seven meta-analyses were retrieved for inclusion in this umbrella review, and for all 3 inflammatory biomarker marker groups, the median intake of supplemental coenzyme Q10 was 200 mg/d for a median duration of 12 weeks. For C-reactive protein, only 3 of the 7 meta-analyses presented with statistically significant reductions, while statistically significant reductions in IL-6 and TNF-α for were observed in 4 of the 5 meta-analyses and 3 of the 4 meta-analyses, respectively. However, statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in the majority of these meta-analyses.
Conclusion
The majority of included meta-analyses showed that coenzyme Q10 supplementation significantly decreased the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α. However, heterogeneity was observed in the majority of these meta-analyses, and therefore the results should be interpreted with caution.