Longitudinal assessment of the impact of orthodontic treatment on adolescents' quality of life: a comparison between boys and girls using a condition specific questionnaire.

Larissa Corradi-Dias, Saul M Paiva, Alexandre F Drummond, José Alcides A de Arruda, Leonardo FS de Menezes, Lucas G Abreu
{"title":"Longitudinal assessment of the impact of orthodontic treatment on adolescents' quality of life: a comparison between boys and girls using a condition specific questionnaire.","authors":"Larissa Corradi-Dias,&nbsp;Saul M Paiva,&nbsp;Alexandre F Drummond,&nbsp;José Alcides A de Arruda,&nbsp;Leonardo FS de Menezes,&nbsp;Lucas G Abreu","doi":"10.54589/aol.35/2/125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the impact of the first year of wearing of a fixed orthodontic appliance on the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) between boys and girls, by means of a condition-specific instrument. The study included 69 adolescents aged 10 to 18 years, who were undergoing orthodontic treatment with a fixed appliance. Of the 69 adolescents, 38 were girls (55.1%) and 31 were boys (44.9%). They answered the Brazilian version of the Impact of Fixed Appliance Measure (B-IFAM) questionnaire three months (T1) and one year (T2) after the fixed appliance was installed. This questionnaire contains 43 questions, distributed across nine domains. The higher the scores, the more negative the perception of the adolescent concerning the impact of the fixed appliance on his/her OHRQoL. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were also analyzed, and statistical analysis was performed. For the domains, the effect size (the magnitude of the difference between girls and boys) and the minimal clinically important difference were also calculated. The adjusted regression showed that there was a significantly greater increase in the overall B-IFAM score in girls than in boys, indicating a more negative perception of the OHRQoL over the study time [Coefficient=11.77 (3.47- 20.60), p=0.006]. From T1 to T2, there was a significantly greater increase in the scores (more negative perception of OHRQoL over time) in girls than in boys for the domains aesthetics (p=0.034) and physical impact (p=0.011). These differences were clinically significant. The effect size (the magnitude of the difference) was moderate. The impact of wearing a fixed appliance on the OHRQoL was more negative in girls than in boys during the first year of orthodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7033,"journal":{"name":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/e5/1852-4834-35-2-125.PMC10283360.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/2/125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the impact of the first year of wearing of a fixed orthodontic appliance on the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) between boys and girls, by means of a condition-specific instrument. The study included 69 adolescents aged 10 to 18 years, who were undergoing orthodontic treatment with a fixed appliance. Of the 69 adolescents, 38 were girls (55.1%) and 31 were boys (44.9%). They answered the Brazilian version of the Impact of Fixed Appliance Measure (B-IFAM) questionnaire three months (T1) and one year (T2) after the fixed appliance was installed. This questionnaire contains 43 questions, distributed across nine domains. The higher the scores, the more negative the perception of the adolescent concerning the impact of the fixed appliance on his/her OHRQoL. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were also analyzed, and statistical analysis was performed. For the domains, the effect size (the magnitude of the difference between girls and boys) and the minimal clinically important difference were also calculated. The adjusted regression showed that there was a significantly greater increase in the overall B-IFAM score in girls than in boys, indicating a more negative perception of the OHRQoL over the study time [Coefficient=11.77 (3.47- 20.60), p=0.006]. From T1 to T2, there was a significantly greater increase in the scores (more negative perception of OHRQoL over time) in girls than in boys for the domains aesthetics (p=0.034) and physical impact (p=0.011). These differences were clinically significant. The effect size (the magnitude of the difference) was moderate. The impact of wearing a fixed appliance on the OHRQoL was more negative in girls than in boys during the first year of orthodontic treatment.

Abstract Image

正畸治疗对青少年生活质量影响的纵向评估:使用特定条件问卷对男孩和女孩进行比较。
本研究的目的是比较佩戴固定正畸矫治器第一年对男孩和女孩口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响,通过特定条件的仪器。该研究包括69名10至18岁的青少年,他们正在使用固定矫治器进行正畸治疗。69名青少年中,女孩38人(55.1%),男孩31人(44.9%)。他们在固定设备安装后三个月(T1)和一年(T2)回答了巴西版的固定设备影响测量(B-IFAM)问卷。这份问卷包含43个问题,分布在9个领域。得分越高,青少年对固定器具对其OHRQoL影响的认知越负面。对社会人口学和临床变量进行分析,并进行统计学分析。对于这些域,还计算了效应大小(女孩和男孩之间差异的大小)和最小临床重要差异。调整后的回归显示,女生的B-IFAM总分明显高于男生,表明随着研究时间的推移,女生对OHRQoL的认知更为消极[系数=11.77 (3.47- 20.60),p=0.006]。从T1到T2,女孩在美学(p=0.034)和身体影响(p=0.011)方面的得分(随着时间的推移,对OHRQoL的负面感知更多)显著高于男孩。这些差异具有临床意义。效应大小(差异的大小)是中等的。在正畸治疗的第一年,佩戴固定矫治器对女孩的OHRQoL的影响比男孩更负。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信