Tooth color in dental students from Buenos Aires University, Dental School, Argentina.

María M Trigo-Humaran, Alan B Agüero-Romero, Marcela Lespade, Juan M García-Cuerva, María E Iglesias
{"title":"Tooth color in dental students from Buenos Aires University, Dental School, Argentina.","authors":"María M Trigo-Humaran,&nbsp;Alan B Agüero-Romero,&nbsp;Marcela Lespade,&nbsp;Juan M García-Cuerva,&nbsp;María E Iglesias","doi":"10.54589/aol.35/2/98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate tooth color in dental students at the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. The participants were 184 students (157 women and 27 men) aged 21 to 33 years, mean age 24.45 (SD 2.79) years, who were in the fourth year of their dental degree. They agreed to participate through an informed consent. Exclusion criteria were: having undergone a bleaching treatment within the previous six months, presence of total or partial peripheral restoration, pigmentations, fracture, carious and non-carious lesions or absence of the right upper central incisor (1.1). A dental prophylaxis procedure was performed on the buccal surface of each 1.1 tooth with a prophylaxis brush (TDV) mounted on a low-speed rotary instrument Kavo 2068 CHC (Germany) micromotor and a Kavo LUX K201(Germany) contra-angle. Shade was measured in the middle third of each 1.1 tooth, by the same observer, using a VITA Easyshade V spectrophotometer (Zahnfabrikn Bad Säckingen, Germany), which was calibrated before each determination according to manufacturer's instructions, in the same dental unit (Sino S2316), with natural illumination, in the same time slot, without using the dental unit lamp. The results were recorded in an ad-hoc form and rates and confidence interval were obtained. Shade prevalence percentages (95% CI) were: A1: 46.2 (38.83 - 53.68); followed by A2 and B2, both with 17.39 (12.21 - 23.66); A3: 6.52 (3.41-11.11); B1: 4.35 (1.9-8.39); D2: 2.72 (0.89 - 6.23); B3: 2.17 (0.60-5.47) and C2: 1.09 (0.13-3.87); D3, C3, A3.5 and A4: 0.54 (0.01-2.99). Shades D1 and C1 were not determined in any subject. Within the conditions of this study, A1 was the most prevalent shade in central incisors, followed by A2 and B2.</p>","PeriodicalId":7033,"journal":{"name":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/0f/1852-4834-35-2-98.PMC10283376.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/2/98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate tooth color in dental students at the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. The participants were 184 students (157 women and 27 men) aged 21 to 33 years, mean age 24.45 (SD 2.79) years, who were in the fourth year of their dental degree. They agreed to participate through an informed consent. Exclusion criteria were: having undergone a bleaching treatment within the previous six months, presence of total or partial peripheral restoration, pigmentations, fracture, carious and non-carious lesions or absence of the right upper central incisor (1.1). A dental prophylaxis procedure was performed on the buccal surface of each 1.1 tooth with a prophylaxis brush (TDV) mounted on a low-speed rotary instrument Kavo 2068 CHC (Germany) micromotor and a Kavo LUX K201(Germany) contra-angle. Shade was measured in the middle third of each 1.1 tooth, by the same observer, using a VITA Easyshade V spectrophotometer (Zahnfabrikn Bad Säckingen, Germany), which was calibrated before each determination according to manufacturer's instructions, in the same dental unit (Sino S2316), with natural illumination, in the same time slot, without using the dental unit lamp. The results were recorded in an ad-hoc form and rates and confidence interval were obtained. Shade prevalence percentages (95% CI) were: A1: 46.2 (38.83 - 53.68); followed by A2 and B2, both with 17.39 (12.21 - 23.66); A3: 6.52 (3.41-11.11); B1: 4.35 (1.9-8.39); D2: 2.72 (0.89 - 6.23); B3: 2.17 (0.60-5.47) and C2: 1.09 (0.13-3.87); D3, C3, A3.5 and A4: 0.54 (0.01-2.99). Shades D1 and C1 were not determined in any subject. Within the conditions of this study, A1 was the most prevalent shade in central incisors, followed by A2 and B2.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯大学牙科学院牙科学生的牙齿颜色。
本研究的目的是评估阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯大学牙科专业学生的牙齿颜色。184名学生(女157名,男27名)年龄21 ~ 33岁,平均年龄24.45岁(SD 2.79),均为牙科专业四年级学生。他们通过知情同意书同意参加。排除标准是:在过去六个月内接受过漂白治疗,存在全部或部分外周修复,色素沉积,骨折,龋齿和非龋齿病变或右侧上颌中切牙缺失(1.1)。预防刷(TDV)安装在低速旋转器械Kavo 2068 CHC(德国)微电机和Kavo LUX K201(德国)对角上,对每颗1.1牙的颊面进行牙齿预防手术。使用VITA Easyshade V分光光度计(Zahnfabrikn Bad Säckingen,德国)在每颗1.1牙的中间三分之一处测量色度,在每次测定前根据制造商的说明进行校准,在同一牙科单元(Sino S2316)中,在自然照明下,在同一时间段,不使用牙科单元灯。结果以特设形式记录,并获得率和置信区间。遮荫患病率(95% CI)为:A1: 46.2 (38.83 ~ 53.68);其次是A2和B2,均为17.39 (12.21 ~ 23.66);A3: 6.52 (3.41-11.11);B1: 4.35 (1.9-8.39);D2: 2.72 (0.89 - 6.23);B3: 2.17 (0.60-5.47), C2: 1.09 (0.13-3.87);D3, C3, A3.5和A4: 0.54(0.01-2.99)。D1和C1未在任何受试者中确定。在本研究条件下,A1是中切牙最常见的阴影,其次是A2和B2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信