Do non-clinical subjective factors influence the treatment decisionmaking of Brazilian dentists?

Renato Fc Vianna, Maíra Prado, Marina C Prado, Leonardo Athias, Gisele Ds Pereira
{"title":"Do non-clinical subjective factors influence the treatment decisionmaking of Brazilian dentists?","authors":"Renato Fc Vianna,&nbsp;Maíra Prado,&nbsp;Marina C Prado,&nbsp;Leonardo Athias,&nbsp;Gisele Ds Pereira","doi":"10.54589/aol.35/1/58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The literature contains little information on several non-clinical factors such as the association between graduate residency programs and the application of minimally invasive dentistry, or on dentists' clinical decision-making processes for replacing restorations for esthetic reasons. This study evaluated whether non-clinical subjective factors influence the treatment decisions made by Brazilian dentists regarding technical and esthetic matters. Dentists were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey by answering an electronic questionnaire containing clinical cases, regarding what treatment they would select for: T1 - a molar tooth with significant crown destruction and spontaneous pain, and T2 - premolar teeth with extensive amalgam restorations and no carious lesion or associated complaint. The survey also included questions about subjective variants (sociodemographic and professional). Chi Square test and Fischer's Exact test were used toanalyzetheanswers to T1, and one-factor analysis of variance and post-hoc Tamhane were applied to T2. The significance level was set at 5% for all analyses. A total 302 professionals participated in the study. For T1, it was found that clinical decision-making was influenced by the Brazilian region of clinical practice (p=0.005). For T2, a significant association was found between increased loss of patient tooth tissues and whether the professional had completed a residency program in Operative Dentistry (p=0.035), worked in a private practice (p=0.033), or if most of his/her patients belonged to a high estimated socioeconomic level (household income above $4350) (p=0.002). In conclusion, the clinical decision-making of Brazilian dentists varies according to professional profile, mainly with relation to the replacement of restorations due to esthetic concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":7033,"journal":{"name":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/c0/1852-4834-35-1-58.PMC10283372.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/1/58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature contains little information on several non-clinical factors such as the association between graduate residency programs and the application of minimally invasive dentistry, or on dentists' clinical decision-making processes for replacing restorations for esthetic reasons. This study evaluated whether non-clinical subjective factors influence the treatment decisions made by Brazilian dentists regarding technical and esthetic matters. Dentists were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey by answering an electronic questionnaire containing clinical cases, regarding what treatment they would select for: T1 - a molar tooth with significant crown destruction and spontaneous pain, and T2 - premolar teeth with extensive amalgam restorations and no carious lesion or associated complaint. The survey also included questions about subjective variants (sociodemographic and professional). Chi Square test and Fischer's Exact test were used toanalyzetheanswers to T1, and one-factor analysis of variance and post-hoc Tamhane were applied to T2. The significance level was set at 5% for all analyses. A total 302 professionals participated in the study. For T1, it was found that clinical decision-making was influenced by the Brazilian region of clinical practice (p=0.005). For T2, a significant association was found between increased loss of patient tooth tissues and whether the professional had completed a residency program in Operative Dentistry (p=0.035), worked in a private practice (p=0.033), or if most of his/her patients belonged to a high estimated socioeconomic level (household income above $4350) (p=0.002). In conclusion, the clinical decision-making of Brazilian dentists varies according to professional profile, mainly with relation to the replacement of restorations due to esthetic concerns.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非临床主观因素是否影响巴西牙医的治疗决策?
文献很少包含一些非临床因素的信息,如研究生住院医师计划与微创牙科应用之间的关系,或牙医因美观原因更换修复体的临床决策过程。本研究评估了非临床主观因素是否会影响巴西牙医在技术和美学方面的治疗决策。通过填写一份包含临床病例的电子问卷,牙医被邀请参与一项横断面调查,了解他们会选择哪种治疗:T1 -臼齿有明显的冠破坏和自发疼痛,T2 -前磨牙有广泛的汞合金修复,没有龋齿损伤或相关的投诉。该调查还包括关于主观变量(社会人口统计学和专业)的问题。T1采用χ 2检验和Fischer’s Exact检验,T2采用单因素方差分析和事后Tamhane检验。所有分析的显著性水平设为5%。共有302名专业人士参与了这项研究。对于T1,我们发现临床决策受到巴西地区临床实践的影响(p=0.005)。对于T2,患者牙齿组织损失的增加与专业人员是否完成了牙科外科住院医师计划(p=0.035),是否在私人诊所工作(p=0.033),或者他/她的大多数患者是否属于高估计的社会经济水平(家庭收入高于4350美元)(p=0.002)之间存在显著关联。综上所述,巴西牙医的临床决策因专业背景而异,主要与修复体更换有关,主要是出于美观考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信