Mindfulness-based emotional regulation for patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A randomized pilot study of efficacy, applicability, and safety.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Santiago Montero Ruiz, Beatriz Rodriguez Vega, Carmen Bayón Pérez, Rafael Peinado Peinado
{"title":"Mindfulness-based emotional regulation for patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A randomized pilot study of efficacy, applicability, and safety.","authors":"Santiago Montero Ruiz,&nbsp;Beatriz Rodriguez Vega,&nbsp;Carmen Bayón Pérez,&nbsp;Rafael Peinado Peinado","doi":"10.5603/CJ.a2021.0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions to reduce anxiety or improve quality of life (QoL) in patients with cardiac pathologies is well established. However, there is scarce information on the efficacy, applicability, and safety of these interventions in adult patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). In this study, we examined their efficacy on QoL, psychological and biomedical variables, as well as the applicability and safety of a mindfulness-based intervention in patients with an ICD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-six patients with an ICD were randomized into two intervention groups and a control group. The interventions involved training in mindfulness-based emotional regulation, either face-to- -face or using the \"REM Volver a casa\" mobile phone application (app).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample presented medium-high QoL baseline scores (mean: 68), low anxiety (6.84) and depression (3.89), average mindfulness disposition (128), and cardiological parameters similar to other ICD populations. After the intervention, no significant differences were found in the variables studied between the intervention and control groups. Retention was average (59%), and there were no adverse effects due to the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After training in mindfulness-based emotional regulation (face-to-face or via app), no significant differences were found in the QoL or psychological or biomedical variables in patients with an ICD. The intervention proved to be safe, with 59% retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9492,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"30 3","pages":"401-410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/4c/cardj-30-3-401.PMC10287067.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions to reduce anxiety or improve quality of life (QoL) in patients with cardiac pathologies is well established. However, there is scarce information on the efficacy, applicability, and safety of these interventions in adult patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). In this study, we examined their efficacy on QoL, psychological and biomedical variables, as well as the applicability and safety of a mindfulness-based intervention in patients with an ICD.

Methods: Ninety-six patients with an ICD were randomized into two intervention groups and a control group. The interventions involved training in mindfulness-based emotional regulation, either face-to- -face or using the "REM Volver a casa" mobile phone application (app).

Results: The sample presented medium-high QoL baseline scores (mean: 68), low anxiety (6.84) and depression (3.89), average mindfulness disposition (128), and cardiological parameters similar to other ICD populations. After the intervention, no significant differences were found in the variables studied between the intervention and control groups. Retention was average (59%), and there were no adverse effects due to the intervention.

Conclusions: After training in mindfulness-based emotional regulation (face-to-face or via app), no significant differences were found in the QoL or psychological or biomedical variables in patients with an ICD. The intervention proved to be safe, with 59% retention.

Abstract Image

植入式心律转复除颤器患者的正念情绪调节:疗效、适用性和安全性的随机先导研究。
背景:以正念为基础的干预对心脏疾病患者减少焦虑或改善生活质量(QoL)的有效性已经得到了很好的证实。然而,关于这些干预措施在成人植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)患者中的有效性、适用性和安全性的信息很少。在本研究中,我们检查了它们对生活质量、心理和生物医学变量的有效性,以及正念干预在ICD患者中的适用性和安全性。方法:96例ICD患者随机分为干预组和对照组。这些干预包括以正念为基础的情绪调节训练,可以是面对面的,也可以是使用手机应用程序(app)。结果:样本呈现中高的生活质量基线得分(平均:68),低焦虑(6.84)和抑郁(3.89),平均正念倾向(128),心脏参数与其他ICD人群相似。干预后,干预组与对照组的研究变量均无显著差异。留置率平均(59%),没有由于干预而产生的不良反应。结论:在接受基于正念的情绪调节训练(面对面或通过app)后,ICD患者的生活质量、心理或生物医学变量均无显著差异。干预被证明是安全的,保留率为59%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology journal
Cardiology journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Journal is a scientific, peer-reviewed journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in cardiology. The journal has been published since 1994 and over the years it has become an internationally recognized journal of cardiological and medical community. Cardiology Journal is the journal for practicing cardiologists, researchers, and young trainees benefiting from broad spectrum of useful educational content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信